Nearly three in five Americans wrongly believe the US is in an economic recession, and the majority blame the Biden administration, according to a Harris poll conducted exclusively for the Guardian. The survey found persistent pessimism about the economy as election day draws closer.

The poll highlighted many misconceptions people have about the economy, including:

  • 55% believe the economy is shrinking, and 56% think the US is experiencing a recession, though the broadest measure of the economy, gross domestic product (GDP), has been growing.

  • 49% believe the S&P 500 stock market index is down for the year, though the index went up about 24% in 2023 and is up more than 12% this year.

  • 49% believe that unemployment is at a 50-year high, though the unemployment rate has been under 4%, a near 50-year low.

  • secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This really misses the big problem. For many people, the costs that are most inelastic (like food and housing) are the ones with the most inflation. For people in financial situations that aren’t great, there aren’t easy ways to lower costs.

    Inflation statistics like the CPI also grossly inaccurately measure what an accurate basket of good is by including many things that are frivolous and so it totally misses how people are feeling. Did the price of a large television go down slightly decreasing the overall inflation a bit? Yes, but I still need to buy incredibly expensive food. I don’t need to buy a TV. That makes me worried. I can’t cut down on food.

    This leads to having to consider things like: should I try to move to an even less expensive place, which results in moving costs? Should I look for a better paying job and is it likely I will find that and what happens if my employer finds out and fires me because I am searching for a new job?

    There are also large feelings of uncertainty about the economy and about inflation. For those who own property and purchased it a lower cost than the market rate, things are fine. For everyone else, it’s terrible.

    Biden is doing a horrible job of being realistic about how people feel about these things. He is looking at ivory tower economic statistics and either he doesn’t get it or isn’t acknowledge it. The message from him is that he’s doing a good job and things are improving. That isn’t reassuring. It feels like a “let them eat cake” mentality. I’d much rather have him say “yes, certain things in the economy are problematic” and then either say how they will be improved or just bluntly say the best option is to not do anything because doing things (like market interference) is potentially worse.

    I support the rights of trans people, and I like some of Biden’s ideas, however for most lower middle class people who are completely stressed out, Biden seems like a terrible option. Even for lower middle class people who dislike Trump, they at least view him as a realist. I am left not knowing if Biden is ignorant of how people who don’t own homes are feeling or if Biden is being so defensive with his record that he seems out of touch, but either way, he will definitely lose at his current trajectory.

    He keeps not addressing this problem and it’s a big problem for many voters, probably over half of all swing voters are effected by this. I wish I could advise Biden on what to say and do to improve his poll numbers, because many of the problems that bother large segments of the voters are things that could be easily resolved through the executive office without new laws while adhering to classical economic theory, but he’s not going to make the needed changes, I have no way of suggesting things except sending a letter that will not be read but instead will just be summarized as a view (like “letter received, opinion is inflation is bad”).

    He is going to keep relying on ivory tower economic statistics because fundamentally he’s a career politician, he believes his bureaucrats or lacks the ability to understand the real experiences behind the data, and Trump is going to swoop right in and pluck every disaffected swing voter or disaffected Democrat he doesn’t reach. The fact that Biden is also doing cool or nice or interesting things in terms of other policy choices doesn’t somehow make up for this major weakness in ignoring this.

    The fact that The Guardian is referring to the public’s “misconceptions” highlights how journalists and also politicians just regurgitate erudite statistics without reflecting on their real world implication, as though regular voters were just wrong or stupid. This is also a problem of Democrats at large who don’t know how to take academic research and information and look to the real-world meaning of it and then communicate effectively with regular people or implement practical policies based on this data.

    So yeah, Biden will definitely lose. Trans people should figure out how to organize now for possible fascism, which sucks. They should figure out how to technologically, emotionally, and organizationally prepare for a worse case scenario. I can’t fathom Biden would win.

    • Papergeist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      In the past, I have been a proponent of learning to cook. Meal prep can save you money, and it tastes better than mickey dee’s. I still believe this, but the bill at the grocery store is making it more and more difficult.

      So now, I’ve been researching gardening and I hope i can save money by growing my own vegetables. I think there are ways to get it going without spending a ton of money. Especially by using reclaimed materials that are free or close to it.

      The issue that concerns me is the amount of time it takes to get the compost pile going. There will be upfront costs if your soil is shit and needs to be amended. Which defeats the entire purpose of growing your own food.

      It sorta feels like we’re fucked whichever direction we look.

    • cryostars@lemmyf.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Good little write-up. I was just thinking along these lines today. It’s a real shame Biden didn’t try just a little harder to connect with the working class.

      • SupahRevs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        His state of the union definitely was pro-working class. A couple quotes from that speech: “A future where the days of trickle-down economics are over and the wealthy and biggest corporations no longer get all the breaks.” “America’s comeback is building a future of American possibilities, building an economy from the middle out and the bottom up, not the top down, investing in all of America, in all Americans to make sure everyone has a fair shot and we leave no one behind!”

      • secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s frustrating because these economic problems are not that hard to change through sensible policy. I’ve thought about making TikTok videos about several things that could be done, but I am concerned about TikTok’s privacy policies and they are about to get banned as a platform anyway. I’m mostly stupid at everything except economics. The only other way to reach people is YouTube and YouTube shorts don’t have any reach and and YouTube also has terrible privacy policies. Both political parties keep making disastrous economic policy decisions instead of making the smart decisions and just taking 3 minutes to explain it to voters. I can’t believe that our politicians are actually this bad at economic policy. With Republicans, I think they are just genuinely evil bad people that are either corrupt or delusional about their impact. For Democrats, it seems like they actually don’t understand economics or can’t make sense of data. I’ve even thought about running for office, but I don’t have a normal job history and was arrested once and charged with assault with a great bodily injury enhancement and am probably too tainted by that to ever appeal to Democrat voters. I’ve also have sucked way too many dicks to appeal to Republicans, just a vast, vast amount of dicks. I don’t think I could be a politician and an openly prolific slut. Ranting on YouTube or TikTok might be a bad look, even if my views are all rigorous and accurate. The policy decisions of our elected officials are so stupid they often make me filled with apoplectic rage, so there would possibly be angry vitriolic ranting if I did try to make any videos going over current bad policy decisions and solutions to correct the problems. It’s probably better to stay quiet and try to live a private life at this point and continue to let our respectable leaders make horrible decisions while occasionally a mild boring economist makes bland commentary without any real policy suggestions or impact. We’re all going to likely be horribly impacted by climate change soon anyway, and there’s a certain seize the day nihilism that goes with that reality and the fact that large amounts of the population don’t understand the brutal cruelty of how exponents look on an x-y coordinate plan when you zoom out.

        I don’t think I could somehow get Biden to do the 3 or 4 things he would need to do in order to win the election, and I hesitate to discuss them on here because Trump’s team could just make those points part of a plan and then it would make Biden’s situation worse. But Biden is on track to lose.

        Trans people should be doing things like installing Briar. It’s that bad. Briar so they can communicate by bluetooth. They should be installing Graphene now, not later. These should be learning the obfuscation techniques practices in China by people trying to break past the great firewall. They are the new scary boogeyman and need to organize now and not once Trump is elected. Many trans people are incredibly smart and great at computers but they need to start planning now to be in a situation in which normal organization may be harder. If they are not in a trans friendly state now, they need to leave now, not later, or plan to leave before the election. This is not going to go well for trans people and it’s horrible to understand what will likely happen.

    • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is a good write up thanks.

      What bothers me is that in his state of the union address he spent time talking about junk fees with Ticketmaster et. al. (which is a problem) yet never really touched on the bigger problem of housing costs. Nor is there any real push by his administration or the Democrats to address this issue any time soon. Like you I don’t know if this is intentional or ignorance due to his advisors.

      It’s a frustrating place to be because I know that Trump gives even less of a shit about the “poors” and would make things even worse. So a large part of this country’s population will sit in the status quo for a minimum of 4 more years hoping that the next round of elections will bring in something new and progressive.

      • lengau@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        FWIW, the Biden administration is doing a decent amount of behind the scenes work on housing costs, both directly (funding low income housing) and indirectly (incentivising cities to change laws that decrease supply and prop up the local landlords). Some of the reasons (IMO) he doesn’t talk much about this are:

        1. Small-scale landlords are a decent chunk of the Democrats’ donor base. So although this isn’t going to significantly negatively affect small-scale landlords (not that I’d care if it did - it just isn’t), too much messaging on that front could have a negative effect on donations.
        2. Some of the least reliable voters that the Democrats are depending on this year are sufficiently leftist to dislike any attempt that isn’t fully public housing. And none of what the Biden administration is doing will result in massive swathes of public housing. Some places might get some at the margins, but mostly what’s happening is that local governments are working with non-profits to provide more affordable housing, using the influx of federal cash to make it happen. Messaging here needs to be very careful not to give these folks an excuse not to vote.
        3. Many of the voters who are (somehow…) on the fence between Biden and Trump are also very NIMBY. So if someone from the Biden administration were to come to their town and say “Joe did this!” that could actually dissuade some undecided voters.

        Is it stupid? Absolutely!

        Is Biden doing enough on housing? Definitely not!

        But a big chunk of what he is doing is flying under the radar, partially because they’re not advertising it and partially because it takes longer than just one presidential term for these kinds of projects to make it to fruition. The first development in my city that took advantage of Biden administration policies finally broke ground in September. The first actual affordable unit to come out of it will be available in 2025.

      • secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Trump lies constantly but he’s also very blunt and realistic about problems (as long as he can disclaim responsibility for their cause). Do you think Trump will avoid talking about this as it gets closer to election time? No, he’s going to be blunt and realistic and pragmatic sounding and Biden will come off as out of touch to the incredibly large base of quiet regular lower middle class and middle class people affected by this. Probably 40% of the vote will be won based on how people are feeling about this and Biden is responding to that by saying “Actually, you’re feelings about the economy are invalid because according to my policy wonks, the economic data is good.” It’s insulting and enraging to the people who are struggling. Many lower middle class and middle class people don’t care that much about abortion or trans issues or whether Trump is a pathological liar being paid by a foreign country to destabilize America. They just want to be able to pay their bills and not be so damned stressed out. Biden absolutely does not get it. This is also the fault of the officials surrounding Biden who should be doing a better job of addressing these problems. Biden is very old and generously ran against Trump out of kindness because he knew he’d be more likely to win. The people around him should be addressing this, the DC insiders and people he took with him into office, and no one addresses the problem or crafts policy. This is an easy win for Trump and he knows it, Trump is not stupid contrary to what many want to imply, he’s enormously intelligent and just mean at times and cruel towards many minorities, but Trump needs to do barely anything to win at this point. You don’t get into Wharton as an idiot, even if you come from money, so liberals who want to claim he’s stupid are doing themselves a disservice by underestimating Trump. Trump is greedy and corrupt and cruel and incredibly intelligent, and if you don’t get the fourth part you miss the threat. Trump also at times has good intentions and people sense that, which is also a threat because he doesn’t seem completely disingenuous. Biden’s campaign is like the Titanic in a field of icebergs and all Trump has to do is just wait. For Biden to win, he’d have to make a lot of changes which he should have done over a year ago, and based on the team around him that hasn’t dealt with the problems correctly, he’s probably not going to make the right choices on this. If he makes superficial meaningless gestures on this issues in a last minute hail mary pass, it’s not going to matter. Voters aren’t stupid. I wish I could write Biden or his team and tell them what they should do, but I’m some nobody. No one would care.

    • bouldering_barista@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I completely respect your points and opinions here. Trying to be a realist myself… I don’t see Trump doing shite to help the average American though economically. He’ll help big oil, wall street execs, and he’ll keep fueling the divide over social issues.

      Let’s be real, trump doesn’t care about us and it’s worth reminding voters of that.

    • Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m a Gen Z’er from the deep south, unions were never mentioned in our education once, neither was the labor movement, they learned what a union was from me, and the first time I ever learned of the concept of a union was from Wikipedia.

      It’s definitely working, way too fucking well.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Maybe the commercal and financial Egonomy is on the rise. But the private economy of the average citizen is nof.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You need to ask yourself why? If unemployment is low and the economy is growing, then why are 3 in 5 struggling? If you have a room with 100 people and 100 pizzas, statistically the room has plenty of food. If 60 of the people complain that they are hungry, you wouldn’t scoff and tell them, “stop complaining, look at all the statistical pizza in the room! Things are actually quite good for everyone.” Sure, maybe some are falling for propaganda, but propaganda doesn’t get you 3 out of 5 people.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It might be that, because of the new gig economy, the number of shitty jobs has increased. Unemployment might be low, but “underemployment” might be high (if there is a way to even track that at all). I bet there are a lot of people who feel trapped in their jobs right now, and that doesn’t help consumer confidence.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It is legitimately such a weird economy, because by all the standard broad metrics it is doing fine, but on an individual basis it varies widely. Cost of living has shot up with inflation, but wages generally didn’t go up to match, particularly for people who kept the same employer throughout the Pandemic until now.

    The only metric that is important is how far their paycheck goes, and it simply doesn’t go as far anymore.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It is legitimately such a weird economy, because by all the standard broad metrics it is doing fine, but on an individual basis it varies widely.

      I took some pretty high level statistical analysis courses back in the day, with a professor who is about as close to “rockstar” as someone can be in the field of statistical analysis.

      One thing he always said was that it was easy to paint a picture exactly the way someone wants while being 100% honest and reporting real numbers.

      What was hard, was picking thru all the numbers, identifying trends, and quantifying the effects and how likely a bunch of changes would play out to predict future outcomes.

      Our economy runs on “numbers must go up”.

      If a CEO of a publicly traded company says anything other than “Shits amazing!” The numbers go down.

      Because stock prices are really just investors opinion, real life doesn’t have much effect on the economy.

      So everyone cheats a little (or a lot) to make their numbers seem like everything is great. Do a meta analysis on those numbers, and it looks like everyone is doing great.

      But it’s all just because no one wants to be the one to say it’s not.

      Because in our economy, if people think things are bad, then that makes things bad. People sell stocks and hide money under mattresses (what the rich do with offshore accounts) and that Cascades I to not enough money to buy anything. And then not enough sales to employ people.

      It’s a feedback loop that the only way to prevent is constantly telling people everything is fine.

      The longer we let 0.01% of the population hoard insane wealth, the more we risk the death spiral

      It’s getting to the point where they have so much, they’re the entire economy. If they decide to just bury all their gold, we’re fucked.

      So we have to keep making these rich assholes think everything is great and numbers will always go up.

      Or just tax their fucking wealth…

  • Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    While I’m not going to blame Biden for the economic situation right now since his policies look more like they’ve cushioned us against a much worse economic situation by pumping money into state-side manufacturing, I absolutely fucking HATE how out of touch economists are these days. They look at the stock market, or at spending that’s driven by debt and rich people, and say “everything looks fine. Oh, most of you can’t afford to eat, or get a job? Sounds like a personal problem.”

    If the conclusions that economists come to are so consistently out of touch with the experience of the average person, maybe they should fix their fucking outlook criteria!!

    I think it was another post on here that had a bunch of [good] economists write a paper stating that if the inflation formula had accounted for borrowing costs like they USED TO, the inflation numbers would match much more closely with public sentiment, after having topped out at 18 fucking percent at the height in 21/22.

    Fuck economists

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      if the inflation formula had accounted for borrowing costs like they USED TO, the inflation numbers would match much more closely with public sentiment

      It is a total mystery why they removed it!

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Last year, they actually put out a report stating that inflation was back to normal “when you discount the costs of groceries, power, housing and fuel” 🤦

        You know, just minor luxury items that everyone can choose to forgo if they want to!

        • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          This is a great little misleading factoid – the missing piece being that inflation is also back to normal if you do include the cost of groceries, power, housing, and fuel.

          The fact that they’re excluded from the usual metric isn’t some weird economic misleading-metric plot (although, those certainly exist). It’s just that the CPI usually excludes those items because their prices can swing around in ways that are different from the ways that the baseline price of everything else swings around. But, if you include them in the analysis of what’s happened since 2020, the answer doesn’t change at all.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            So you’re saying that groceries, power, and housing are NOT more expensive now than in 2020? Is that seriously what you’re trying to make people believe??

            the CPI usually excludes those items because their prices can swing around in ways that are different from the ways that the baseline price of everything else swings around.

            The most basic things that everyone needs, the things that especially the working poor spend the vast majority of all income isn’t itself the baseline for the CONSUMER price index?

            That’s as fucking useless to gauge how regular people are doing as measuring the overall economy by GDP and stock prices, then! 🤦

            • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              So you’re saying that groceries, power, and housing are NOT more expensive now than in 2020? Is that seriously what you’re trying to make people believe??

              I am saying that their prices have gone up pretty much by the same amount as the general CPI, including a huge spike upwards in 2022, which means that looking at the CPI without them is exactly the same (in this particular case) as looking at the CPI with them.

              Stop. Read again.

              I am saying that their prices have gone up pretty much by the same amount as the general CPI, including a huge spike upwards in 2022, which means that looking at the CPI without them is exactly the same (in this particular case) as looking at the CPI with them.

              Makes sense, right? Or no? I’m happy to talk in a little more detail if you want.

              Here are the numbers. It’s complex, obviously, and some commodities will spike way, way up, or drop below 0% inflation and stay negative for a while. But it actually happens that if you average it all out, CPI with everything is right now more or less the same as CPI with the normal stuff excluded. Good things to highlight to see it are “All Items” or “Less Food and Energy” or “Shelter”. Between those three, it’ll give you a pretty good picture, and they all behave pretty much the same - a big hump after Covid from supply-chain shock and corporate greed, i.e. the situation Biden came in with, and then reducing steadily back down as Biden’s policies got ahold of it.

              Makes sense? Or no? Like I say, I’m happy to talk about the details.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s metrics.

      American culture has an absolutely horrible relationship with metrics.

      For “the economy” the metrics are profits of corporations. Because back in the day that would generally translate to employee pay, number of employees, and how much money was changing hands.

      But metrics should never be the final thing you look at, it’s just an indicator.

      Like, if your engine light isn’t on but black smoke is pouring out from the engine…

      It’s probably best to look under the hood at what’s actually happening.

      But because our economy is based of wealthy investors, and they just care about the metrics, people game the metrics and come up with this rosey view of how things are.

      Regular Americans don’t care about the metrics that are being gamed. We’re looking at the crazy person who’s driving a car around that’s obviously on fire. When they wave at us like everything is normal, it’s not reassuring, it makes us think that person has no clue what’s going on, and it’s probably not a good idea to let them keep driving

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s not just America. The whole world is addicted to a school of economics that “models” reality without ever actually studying it.

        Most economists basically operate in a world of frictionless spherical cows moving in an infinite vacuum, and then from this try to infer useful data about the expected price of milk.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Most economists basically operate in a world of frictionless spherical cows moving in an infinite vacuum, and then from this try to infer useful data about the expected price of milk

          😘👌

      • eltrain123@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Recession is coming. What we are seeing is how capitalism works. Businesses are squeezing as much profitability as they can out of existing products. The stories you see about record profits drive those actions. As long as they are making money, they push the strategy. The stories we are just starting to see about price cuts (like Target lowering grocery prices and the likes) are early indicators that corporate profits are peaking and adjustments need to be made to continue sales before revenue falls off a cliff.

        People suffer when they get priced out of purchasing power. Businesses will suffer when they squeeze the market too hard, which is where we are. Unfortunately, people are going to suffer on that side, too, as businesses cut jobs to try to stem the bleeding.

        We are in for a few fucked up years regardless of who gets elected in the next presidency. It takes a long time for real changes in the economy to show up. A lot of what we are dealing with is from the money flooded into the economy during Covid (under both Trump and Biden) and the swings in pricing due to loss of supply chain and the stickiness of pricing associated with its return.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          like Target lowering grocery prices and the like

          That’s not them.lowering prices…

          That’s them launching a “value brand” they slap their name on.

          It’s priced low to capture market share. Why make $1 a unit you’re selling when you can make $2 a unit because you’re also the one who makes it?

  • OpenStars@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I find it so sad to see The Guardian of all news organizations join in on this bUt ThE eCoNoMy ThO bullshit. Fortunately it looks simply like a poorly written article, but that’s little comfort for the damaging effects it will have regardless, e.g. in my trust of The Guardian articles henceforth.

    Also, it’s not just that, when it combines clickbait headlines with the first half of the article working to obfuscate the Truth with correct but irrelevant facts - beatings will continue until moral improves - even if the second half tries to sound more balanced. Is Fox News going to be the goal now, even if only for the first half of every article, going forward?

    Average people, who don’t own stock (or if they do, don’t rely on it as their primary source of income) could care less about bUt ThE eCoNoMy ThO or even the theoretical underpinnings of inflation, and care far more about their current job security and cost of actual food. Whether the proper term of “recession” applies or if it instead is some other word that should be used to describe it, either way the economy is “not good”, so hyper-focusing on uneducated people not knowing the technical definition of “recession” doesn’t seem to be helping the situation any? Even if it sells advertising space for this article:-(.

    The AutoTL;DR summary, with no title and much of the rage-baiting removed, is much better than the actual article.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The issue is voters talk about how regular people are doing, while politicians talk about “the economy” which is rich people and business…

    For them, shits going great. Because their record profits are coming from regular Americans being priced gouged.

    Also, I stopped reading when the article clearly couldn’t understand inflation compliants.

    The poll underscored people’s complicated emotions around inflation. The vast majority of respondents, 72%, indicated they think inflation is increasing. In reality, the rate of inflation has fallen sharply from its post-Covid peak of 9.1% and has been fluctuating between 3% and 4% a year.

    In April, the inflation rate went down from 3.5% to 3.4% – far from inflation’s 40-year peak of 9.1% in June 2022 – triggering a stock market rally that pushed the Dow Jones index to a record high.

    The inflation rate is slowly going down. But it’s a rate, prices are still up and continuing to go up. That 9.1% from 2022 is still baked into the 3% increase we’re experiencing.

    Like. Say it was 100, 9% increase makes it 109. 3% of 109 is more than 3% of 9%.

    It’s compounded

    So the inflation rate should go down but it’s not like that means lower prices, it just means 1% increase now is more than a 1% increase in the past.

    And that’s not even getting into the harsh truth about inflation and capitalism:

    A lack of inflation means people save money. That takes money out of circulation. A lot of our problems are because the wealthy do that with huge sums.

    If enough money gets taken out of circulation then it leads to a recession as there’s less money floating around and changing hands.

    We need inflation to prop up this bullshit economic system the wealthy are obsessed with.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not only is it compounding, but 3-4% inflation hasn’t happened in over a decade. To get anything comparable to the last three years you have to go back to the 80s.

      • Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I mentioned it in a different comment, but there was a paper written by some economists that compared the current inflation formula with the one they used to use (in use in the 80’s, iirc) which takes borrowing costs such as mortgage into account, and that 9.1 peak pandemic inflation number doubled to 18 something %, with our current 3.4% becoming something north of 9%. So yeah, not great.

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Polling isn’t going to change people’s minds about it FEELING like a recession. It certainly feels like anyone who owns or controls any sort of economic production is on a cash-grab bender, jacking up prices on absolutely everything, and finding new ways to exploit the populace while the getting is good. People can’t afford the basic staples of life. It FEELS pretty dire.

  • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Isn’t this the same old “ThE eCoNoMy Is DoInG gReAt, WhY aRe YoU cOmPlAiNiNg?” BS as always?

    The average person doesn’t care how well the rich people’s game is going if they’re struggling to afford their groceries because of said rich people’s game.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    People can’t afford rent and food. The most Biden has done to address the corporate greed and price gouging is telling them to knock it off lol. The attempts at trying to gaslight people into believing the economy is good won’t work.

  • Sabata11792@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Corpo say economy is great because green line. I went from $200 for a month of food to $400 while losing 30 pounds. Retirement is fiction. I even got a new job paying double of what my old job was just to stay stagnant.

    There not playing the same game as us.

  • HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    We are obviously not currently in a recession but the economy is not great for regular folks, however it has not been since like the 90’s.

  • Today@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have a friend with whom i disagree on most issues. They were recently complaining about how bad the economy is, how expensive food is, and that their family can’t afford to eat beef. They have a large house, they’ve been paying an extra $1000-2000 per month on their mortgage for the last two years, and they invited 2 adult children to move home so the kids could save money for houses. They watch Fox News (or worse) and believe they’re struggling. I pointed out some cheap chicken and other items in a grocery ad and the response was, “but those are just the things that are on sale; everything else is expensive.” I was stunned - almost everything i buy is on sale. Yes…you’re right…the wagyu costs more than it used to.

    My kids also complain, “Our grocery bill is twice what it was two years ago!” Maybe because you’re now spending $75/wk in protein shakes and supplements?

    I’m not saying that people aren’t struggling or that they shouldn’t be able to buy things they want, but the people who complain the loudest (in my experience) are not the ones who are in the most difficult situations.

    • iamdisillusioned@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      My conservative parents have also been complaining about the economy and their financial situation. In April they spent 4k to get a box at a baseball game and asked me for money to pay for it, citing that its a special spend to celebrate my dad’s 60th birthday. Then last week I found out that they are going on a 16k eastern European river cruise this summer. Talk about temporarily embarrassed millionaires.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      My kids also complain ….

      Yeah, I really feel this. My kids are teens and one is actively lifting/bulking, so food goes so much faster now, and foods with lean protein (so much chicken) are much more expensive than a reasonable amount of veggies and carbs to help fill up

      A decade or two ago I would really tease a couple friend of ours for preparing meals like “steak on a plate” instead of something more nutritionally balanced and with healthier fat choices. Now my one kid wants “chicken on a plate”, twice as much chicken and nothing else