The former Wyoming congresswoman Liz Cheney “hopes to be able to rebuild” the Republican party after Donald Trump leaves the political stage. Mitt Romney, the retiring Utah senator and former presidential nominee, reportedly hopes so too.

Among other prominent Republicans who refuse to bow the knee, the former Maryland governor Larry Hogan is running for a US Senate seat in a party led by Trump but insists he can be part of a post-Trump GOP.

Michael Steele, the former Republican National Committee chair turned MSNBC host, advocated more dramatic action: “We have to blow this crazy-ass party up and have it regain its senses, or something else will be born out of it. There are only two options here. Hogan will be a key player in whatever happens. Liz Cheney, [former congressmen] Adam Kinzinger and Joe Walsh – all of us who have been pushed aside and fortunately were not infected with Maga, we will have something to say about what happens on 6 November.”

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    There’s a middle ground. The near future of the party is Ron DeSantis and JD Vance, the smoothed down versions of Trump. I don’t think that works and someone new will come out fully populist with authoritarian edges, maybe a Hispanic man to help attract the working class beyond just white people, that seems to be the growth opportunity Republicans need and maybe that solidifies Arizona/Nevada/Texas for them while they put all the effort into the Blue Wall and North Carolina.

  • Veneroso@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Nope. Assuming that Trump loses (which I had thought was a foregone conclusion, but genocide and stupidity is a hell of a drug)…

    People like being on the winning team. And having lost the popular vote three times in a row, Trumpism will start to fade. Republicans will switch to the Democrat party, cementing the current rightwards shift. Imagine the Democrats being pro-border in 2020? 2022?

    The only silver lining is that in 8 to 10 years we might actually see a progressive party emerge.

    If Trump wins, we get faster genocide plus Fascism at home, so at least there’s that to look forward to. Hope you’re practicing how to be a straight cis white male Christian because it’s going to be a rough time for everyone else.

    But hey, Jill Stein won’t get that check from Putin unless you vote for her and Cornel West has alimony payments to make.

  • limelight79@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hogan is a great example. I actually wasn’t upset when he won his second term as governor, even though I disagree with some of his policies - but in general he did some good stuff for Maryland during his terms. Like getting masks and covid test kits in secrecy so Trump’s idiots wouldn’t confiscate them, as happened elsewhere in the country.

    I’ll never forgive him for axing the bike lane on the new Nice Bridge; we’re stuck with that decision for at least 50 years now. But, by far, my biggest problem with Hogan is the “R” after his name.

    Those third-party organizations are running ads that say things like, “I voted for Hogan, but not this time - we can’t let the Republicans gain power in Congress.” (Other organizations are noting “scandals” for the other candidate about taking tax breaks to which she wasn’t entitled, but they seem overblown. It seems pretty silly coming from supporters of the party of George Santos, Matt Gaetz, and how many others…)

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Would be wonderful if Steele only succeeds in creating a center-right party, with the GOP still existing as far-right, giving the Democrats (who now have permission to move left) a leg-up in the future.

    • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      The Democratic Party will never move left. If our country exists in a recognizable way in four years, we need to put every Republican on trial, let the Dems be the party on the right, and start a new leftist party. Anyone with an R after their name is supporting a traitor to democracy, and is guilty of treason by association.

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    No. The Republican Party is now a cult devoted to a person. The party will not be able to move on until that person is out of the picture.

    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Are you implying that the assassination attempt(s) might be attempts to save the GOP?

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Are you implying that the assassination attempt(s) might be attempts to save the GOP?

        The second would-be assassin seemed to think so.

    • RangerJosie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Even if he loses this election he’ll be a kingmaker behind the scenes for the rest of his life. On top of being the default candidate every 4 years until he dies.

      We’re gonna be deprogramming these people for the rest of our lives.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Just let them be “republicans”, make a new “conservatives” party and with the fucked up system the democrats will win every time …

        Hmm…

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            Imagine two main political parties that each try to do their best for their constituents and their country, are ethical and upstanding citizens, and willing to work with their peers to build the future. Imagine choosing between multiple legitimate candidates by policy, rather than fear of fascism

          • Valmond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            Hopefully enough people understand that the system is broken and needs some fixing instead.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          This is exactly what I hope happens… I’m just not sure Republicans have it in them not to line up behind a flawed candidate.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Are they going to rebuild or they just trying to migrate and take over the Democratic Party? We have this tendency to assume that this country is going to be two parties just as they are right now for the rest of our time but parties have changed in America many times. Hell, these two parties virtually swap places once. Nothing says it can’t happen again.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Are they going to rebuild or they just trying to migrate and take over the Democratic Party?

      This is exactly what I think is happening. The result of R destroying itself is somehow turning out to be no political home for progressives and left of them in US politics.

    • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      A lot has shifted over time, but the default state of American politics has always been two dominant parties.

      That said, I could absolutely see a scenario where an American centrist party forms, still solidly to the right of most Western democracy, but centrist by current local standards, which not only pulls in the non-MAGA Republicans but also moderate Democrats, blue collar Dems from purple states, and once it gains traction and wins a few races, massive support from corporations and lobbies.

      They’d win landslide victories over both older parties, especially as progressives and leftists gained greater control of the Democratic party through the flight of the moderates to the new centrist party, which would in turn drive even more establishment Dems to the new party.

      They could run on nothing more than “common sense compromise, unity, and moving beyond the partisan squabbling that has plagued the country for decades”, and be successful for at least 3 cycles before they even had to really take up any issues in earnest.

      The deep South would stay red, the West cost, new York, and Illinois would stay blue, but I could see all of the mid Atlantic, Midwest, plains states, new England, and Southwest going for a viable centrist party.

      For a long few years, national level politics would be absolute fucking chaos.

      • MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not sure about New England. New Hampshire and Maine such a party would probably work in, but I am doubtful of any of the rest. MA and VT are two of the most left-leaning states in the country.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Considering the number of republicans who have officially come out in support of Harris, even if it’s just to avoid trump, it’s certainly possible.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    The brand is kind of poisoned, they should abandon it, let the wackos have it, and come up with something new.

          • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            And, even if they were, you could just promise bogus tax cuts and cheap legal weed and slide in being socially conservative, they wouldn’t notice.

            But yes, you are right, Libertarian capitalists want the social freedom to make profits, which comes from restricting freedoms for those who are less wealthy. They will always fundamentally want less freedom for those they will oppress in order to force them to so kindly donate the vast majority of their labour in return for a small payment.

  • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why would they want to? They have all but taken over the democratic party. The US now has OG republicans and the new world fascist party.

    The current Dem standce on immigration is wild… not the wall is a weird idea… no they now say trump is just ineffective in building it.

    • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      The current Dem standce on immigration is wild… not the wall is a weird idea… no they now say trump is just ineffective in building it.

      Republicans: “We absolutely will not allow a single bit of progress on this issue unless you give us a wall”

      Democrats; “Fine you can have your wall if it means we can at least fix part of the problem now”

      Seems like the wild position here are the assholes demanding a wall in order to allow action. They control the House. We have to change that.

      • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Until Democrats stop using the threat of a Republican administration to extort our votes, they get to be held responsible for all the Republican legislation they help pass.

  • distantsounds@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    This also applies to much of the left. It’s because the US is an oligarchy and doesn’t have representation that is proportional

    • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      You’re getting downvotes, but you’re right.

      At least you were, but now the Republicans are going to fall apart when they lose and “The Left” will be free to organize against the right-wing, pro-fracking, genocide-supporting Democrat party.

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Trump happened because large segments of US voters feel disenfranchised and resentful, as they feel they have been left behind and that their lives have been made worse by the policies of the political establishment and experts. If said political establishment and the experts want to end the Trump movement and prevent something similar from happening again, they’re going to have to address the concerns of dissatisfied voters. I don’t really think either party knows how to go about doing that.

    I think part of the reason for that is there’s still significant discussion about what has caused so many Americans to become so unhappy with leadership, and you can’t really come up with a solution until you correctly identify the problem. I still don’t think the experts have a very good grasp on why Americans are upset. Until they figure it out, they can’t come up with a solution, and until they come up with a solution, movements like Trumpism are still very possible.

    • model_tar_gz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Oh they fucking know. Say it with me:

      Wealth Inequity
      

      I don’t think anyone really hates Jo Millionaire. Jo, the master electrician that lives down the street and employs 5-10 electricians from apprentice to employee-master is a millionaire and contributes positively to their local community. Creating jobs through helping people with their electrical projects, spending in the local economy, etc. And that’s a realistic goal for their apprentices to aspire and work towards.

      Unfortunately that’s who republican voters think they’re voting to support.

      But they’ve been duped; they’re actually voting to support the Billionaire Aristocrats of the world who pull up the ladder behind them through monetary influence of politics and not paying a damn dime on their ‘income’ (because they’re “borrowing against” their unfathomable hoard).

      “They” know why the voters and disenfranchised and that’s their fucking plan—because it keeps them employed and wining and dining fancy with their Aristocrat puppet masters.

      • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t think anyone really hates Jo Millionaire. Jo, the master electrician that lives down the street and employs 5-10 electricians from apprentice to employee-master is a millionaire and contributes positively to their local community.

        I think that’s true, but some Jo millionaires get rich enough to become part of the billionaire aristocrats. That’s the goal, isn’t it? Don’t most business owners want to grow their business and their wealth, seemingly indefinitely? Maybe that’s why the millionaires are such strong supporters of the billionaires: because they ultimately aspire to be among them. Obviously, most won’t be able to achieve that, but they aspire to it nonetheless.

    • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Trump happened because large segments of US voters feel disenfranchised and resentful, as they feel they have been left behind and that their lives have been made worse by the policies of the political establishment and experts.

      Plus “and their solution is to oppress outgroups so that, in comparison, they have more status.”

    • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Trump is happening because far right republicans realized after Watergate that if they wanted to get away with crimes in the future, that they needed to have news that presents “alternate” facts that are favorable to their narrative or that would at the least muddy the waters. Roger Ailes his plan worked basically.

      Without censoring his appearances, Trump comes across as petulant/weak/selfish/stupid/hateful/… Without censoring his history, republican voters would have known that he was a serial scam artist, serial adulterer, … Basically without that alternate fact media supporting rightwing skullduggery, there would never have been a president Trump.

      Imo it’s nonsense to claim that Trump getting elected, is happening because voters are angry because of mysterious reasons that no one can figure out, when those voters are so misinformed that they consistently vote against their own interests and believe stupid conspiracy theories that are being pushed to rile them up against the “other”. As long as that many people live in an alternate reality based on lies and hate, there is no helping them. So the challenge becomes: how do you bring them out of it and how do you prevent it from happening again in the future.

      • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        it’s nonsense to claim that Trump getting elected, is happening because voters are angry because of mysterious reasons that no one can figure out…

        That’s not exactly what I am saying. It’s more that there isn’t yet a consensus of what the root problem is. There are a lot of theories, sure, like yours. That’s one theory, but, confident though you may be that that is the exact problem, not everyone agrees, or at least they think there’s more to it than that.

        I think there might be some truth to your theory, but I don’t agree with the idea that these people are essentially doing fine, but they’ve been brainwashed into thinking they’re not doing fine. That it’s all just a result of some kind of mass hypnosis. That kind of erases the very real problems that many of these people do face.

        • DancingBear@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          One thing we can all agree on is that the problem that upsets voters has nothing to do with lack of healthcare, inability to purchase a first home, lack of a decent social safety net nor anything to do with inflation, money in politics or dark money corporate pak donations

    • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      The new left party that forms in the wake of the Republican implosion will rise out of the growing union movement that is already organizing to address that fundamental problem.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        At what point will voting for that new left party become optimal?

        • always has been

        • when they reach 33%

        • when Republicans reach 25%

        • when Republicans are literally gone

        • other

        • ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          When they run candidates for lower offices in “safe” districts, and can win seats there. At that point, they can force the Dems into coalition building.

          Or when the Republican party has about as much influence as the Libertarian and Constitution parties. Either/or.

        • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          If you plan to wait until you can vote for them in a national election then you’re missing the point.

          The democracy you’re looking for is built from the bottom up, starting with your coworkers.

          The first vote you should be concerned with is a card check election to unionize your workplace.

    • distantsounds@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      This also applies to much of the left. It’s because the US is an oligarchy and doesn’t have representation that is proportional

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        People are downvoting you but it’s correct. The left has no representation in this country. It’s just far-right and right when you go to the polls.

    • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s really not hard to identify why, but billionaires will spend their life savings convincing people that late stage capitalism and oligarchy work.

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    We have to blow this crazy-ass party up and have it regain its senses

    You all going back to Eisenhower years then? The rot has been in the party for a long time, Trump is just the final result, not a cause.

      • ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nixon started the rot with the Southern Strategy. Reagan made it so much worse. Both of them were complete and utter pieces of shit.

        Yeah, if you want a healthy, nontoxic Republican party, you gotta go back to Eisenhower.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Reagan was a product of the shift Republicans had made earlier to help guarantee votes and power. The difference in the GOP then and now was mainly in how much they could say out loud.

    • Wiz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I might vote for an Eisenhower Republican. 90% tax on the rich to pay for infrastructure and federal work programs? Sign me up.

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Within a year or two of Trump dying they will have the party back under control and everyone will be taking marching orders from only the megadonors again.

    The only reason the maga nutjobs got tontake center stage was Trump saying the horrible shit out loud with the delivery that some people wanted to hear. The fact that nobody has upstaged him is a good sign that there isn’t a similar person waiting in the wings to fill his role.

    • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not so fast. David Duke was saying the quiet part out loud and he was only a fringe candidate. There’s something else going on here, I don’t know what it is exactly, that makes Trump more marketable.

      The only things I can think of is that he has had decades in the public eye, and he’s been presented as smart and successful. And also oddly, he reflects a bygone era in America where blue collar union guys had pensions and that this was all blown away by corporate greed and globalization.

      And yet somehow, this billionaire who’s known for grift and not paying his workers, somehow became their champion. The whole process has opened my eyes to just how much marketing works on a certain demographic.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        There’s something else going on here, I don’t know what it is exactly, that makes Trump more marketable.

        He is a professional bullshitter who can say anything with a straight face. It works on a large part of the population, because humans are social creatures who want to hear what they want to hear. They want to be told all their problems will be magically solved and are the fault of someone else.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    How about not having a party that did everything possible to get us to this place. I want what the dems are now to be as far to the right as this country is willing to go.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      While right vs left is overall a useless idea, overall I wan to move more right than trump who I find too centrist. To each their own.