So, a night of the long knifes?

My red herring? You open by making a statement that could easily mean eliminating all Jews and when asked what you mean you refuse to specify (or concoct some kumbaya alternate reality fiction). Instead you blurt that the question is flippant. And now you say red herring as if that somehow absolves you of taking a position that has no basis in reality or a position that just wishes all Jews to dissapear.

The situation in Israël is neither clear cut nor easy. And since one side (Israël) holds all the power I would expect that side to come up with a just and equitable solution that works for Palestinians too… and that is not what they are currently doing… We see war mongering genocidal idealogs run their campaign of destruction simply because Bibi needs war to stay out of jail. The reason why these right wing extremist settlers are in the Israeli government in turn has its basis in constant shelling of Israel proper. Which continue because Israël refuses to provide their neighbors with an equitable solution and not keep settling the west bank.

Way to move the goalposts… It’s a series of own goals compounded by “help” from their friends that landed the Palestinians in this horror. In Turn the current horror now has 3 revisionist antisemites in a trenchcoat using the poor Palestinians as a beard to practice their antisemitism out in the open.

Uhm… what? Kept fleeing to Muslim lands? Antisemitism a European thing… wow… someone did a number on you man… I’d suggest you ask for a refund from school.

The original plans where also a lot smaller and entitled Palestinians to a lot of land and their own state. Neighboring countries and Palestinians would not have it. The region was english ruled because the ottomans sided with Germany in ww1… they where by definition the baddies. Then WW2 happened. You seem to be cherry picking a lot of stuff that happened over the course of the last 120 years or so for that area.

Yeah, we tried that. With the neighboring countries intervening and waging war, and the following wars we ended up here. But this time it will be different.

Sure… you still are dancing around specifying what your dissolution of the state of Israel would look like.

I’d personally like to see Netanyahu in a small concrete cell in Scheveningen… just so we’re clear.

No, you made a statement that required a follow up question… requiring you to elaborate. But I have the feeling that you are answering like this cause you simply refuse to say the quiet part out loud, or are to cowardly to come out and say it. But that’s OK. I think most people reading your response get what you mean.

Well, that looks like it ignores reality a bit. That the current state of Israel is doing fucked up stuff atm gets no arguement from me, but it did not happen in a vacuum.

Spouting revisionist nonsense about how equal the Jews where treated all over the world also does not help the situation either. Nor does ignoring the current situation and how if the state where to be dissolved and a new state created in its place that would give all people of the region equal rights and protections… they would magically all get along.

So again… what then? What would you suggest?

That’s not an answer to the question though, you are advocating for the dissolution, so let’s put it on the table…

And in your suggested dissolution of the state of Israel, what happens then? And what happens to the Jews that now live there?

They have that right tough. It’s just what we are all witnessing goes “a little” further than that.

Well, it worked out for all of us. Coastguard did not spend any money on him, he did not have to give a corrupt politician any money, and we got some headlines from it. I’m for this storyline. 10/10 more please.

But dismantling NOAA means the data that proves this will be paywalled and beholden yo private ownership so skewed… So the plan to combat your line of reasoning is already in motion. They just need enough Americans to fall for their candidate.

I don’t get what you mean… can you elaborate?

I have a hard time imagining how that would work. Because teeth would mean there is a mechanism that could ultimately force countries to supply warm bodies to do enforcement.

So… will they keep him in pre trial confinement until after the election? Repubs owning the libs 1 vote at a time… uh… wait…

I hope zelenski gets to write a tell all auto-biography at some point looking back on this period.

Well yes, the risk that is present is that if countries where to openly intervene and wage war against Israël, the US would intervene on the side of Israel.

Talking in the UN allows them to weigh their options, which allows them to make more informed decisions. Regardless of the subject matter at hand.

The UN is a forum for dialogue. Expecting the UN to do something other than either say stuff or help byandate supported by countries just shows you don’t understand what their purpose is.

Walking out in this case sends the message. If these countries want to do something about it they can, other countries might intervene on Israëls behalf. The UN provides a forum to discuss this kind of stuff. So countries don’t end up in wars they did not want.