This isn’t about immediately filtered content, like the disgusting DuffMan George Floyd meme, or Holocaust denial. That’s pretty well kept in check by mod tools. I’m also not talking about cogent or even pointed political discussion.

I’m not even talking about necessarily in this community directly, however in a lot of other spaces I’ve noticed a lot of accounts using divisive language and terms like “The ineffectual left” “single issue voters” “ignorant right wing morons”. Lots of straw man arguments, lots of willful ignorance.

I’m not a centrist, I’m very very very far left however I know well enough not to patently dismiss the talking points of others, outside of course calls to genocide. I know what dog whistles sound like, and I’m hearing a lot of them lately.

Most egregiously I’m seeing very long form post replies that read very much like what is generated from LLMs.

So I guess my question is, how’re we all fairing with what might be the largest Turing test ever?

  • LemmyBe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s election season, so get used to this. Other countries have learned how to divide us using social media, not to mention the years of experience Fox New and Co. have in doing just that. On top of it, we now have AI generated posts to contend with. It’s not getting better anytime soon…personally, I just ignore any post that sounds like it’s inflammatory (which sadly are almost all political posts, and everything Musk).

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve had a lot of strawman arguments used against me lol. It’s just the internet, I find

      • YeetPics@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        They’re fighting to remain federated; they feel the disdain from every sane /c and can (surprisingly) see the writing on the wall this time that soon they’ll have to make sockpuppet accounts if they want to continue to troll.

  • yyyesss?@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    yes, very much. i’ve been telling my partner it may be time to give up on Lemmy.

    the ones that kill me are the long-form posts that seem to be making one point then pivot in the middle and get confusing. they’re just muddying the waters but people who don’t read past the first sentence or two upvote so they gain traction.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m seeing very long form post replies that read very much like what is generated from LLMs.

    Oh goodness, as one who has a bad habit of putting responses into essay form, I hope this doesn’t refer to me. I’m not an LLM. Honest!

    Okay, I’m pretty sure I’m human. It’s a damn convincing hallucination.

  • weariedfae@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yes it has been a stark difference that picked up this month. I was in what used to feel like a chill community and the sheer vitriol of the threads the past week has been really annoying.

  • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I see more posts about “have you seen this or that in lemmy recently” or “lemmy is worse than reddit” posts more often than these supposed trolls. Sure they exist but all of the time they are down voted or deleted.

    There is also someone saying in the comments that criticizing biden is a foreign conspiracy. Some of these Americans just look like a reflection of the right but call themselves left. I’m not American so I face no real threat(as far as I’m aware) regardless of who gets elected there. So I just think you can criticize “both sides” people without making your leader look immortal

  • snownyte@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I always suspect a lot of them are coming from Reddit to take their daily dump on something to discourage others from using. All in hopes that we come back to Reddit so that they can gaslight, cry to mods and have us banned again just for their own amusement.

    Yeah they say that the internet in general can produce these kinds of people from all corners, but you do notice by behavior. If it isn’t Reddit, it’s got to be Twitter. One of the two, they’re the most rabid of the bunch that would resort to these kind of things because they don’t lead any productive lives.

    • Bizarroland@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Don’t forget, there is a large and worldwide vested interest in maintaining online divisiveness.

      The internet has become our global hearth. The grand majority of humanity participate in the internet to communicate with each other for conversation, connectedness, and social expression.

      This is very bad for authoritarian regimes, whether they are currently in power or attempting to enter into power or attempting to expand their power.

      Should someone do something that is considered “bad”, information about that will spread around the world as fast as a lie ever could.

      To prevent that from hampering their schemes, the smart thing to do would be to poison the source. If you hate everyone on the internet because you have been effectively compromised by psychological poison, then you will not trust the people on the internet that you communicate with when they tell you something bad has happened.

      Therefore, the mote of power you could add to collective action is rendered ineffective.

      And, the interesting thing is they don’t have to fool everybody. They only have to fool enough of us that our own internal division prevents effective action.

      I never really believed in a devil growing up, but if I did believe in a devil now, I would definitely say that this is one of his activities.

  • Pojankolli@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think some communities might benefit from a very strict no-politics rule. Because this right wing trolling is ruining lemmy for me.

    • YeetPics@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Like when all the rightoids show up to a discussion and spam image macros of pigs shitting on their own balls?

      Get real, this is a left-centered platform, 98% of the trolls aren’t right wing, not by a country mile.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The Russians are all over hexbear. Read the rare thread about Ukraine over there and it’s literally the same shit the Russian trolls say.

        These aren’t leftists, they are right wingers (barely) pretending to be leftists.

    • Ozone6363@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Hilarity.

      “Right wing” for this community is if someone is a capitalist.

      Ya’ll have a super left wing echo chamber that’s freaking out about any dissent.

      This sort of shit is exactly why everyone is a political extremist now. You insert yourselves into communities that only agree with you.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      “no politics” is what the right says when you suggest that maybe gay people are people. What you mean is a “no conservatives” rule.

  • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve noticed a huge influx of anti-Biden posts and comments, to the extent that I honestly think we’re finally getting the reddit treatment. I remember there, when the Russian Internet connection went down, and for like a day all those kinds of posts nearly evaporated. And it seems like those accounts don’t just do the overtly political things, they also engage in other areas, usually with a conservative slant.

    • fishos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Nope, not a bot and anti-Biden registered Dem. You guys always want to Strawman anti-Biden comments as either “angry conservatives” or “Russian-psyops”. You don’t actually address the concerns either, just brush them off as trolls. Discourse on Lemmy is a echo-chambered joke already. It doesn’t need trolls to ruin it, you’ve done plenty well yourselves.

    • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      We used to think that if we had user-generated content, we would all be immune to governments, corporations and other powerful actors spreading propaganda because we would get our information from each other, not them.

      Turns out: governments, corporations, other powerful actors are perfectly capable of paying “users” to “generate content” and not even disclose this.

      The Internet used to be an exciting development, now it’s just like, yeah it exists, so what.

      • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        paying “users”

        And using LLMs, then eventually getting useful idiots involved as well.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I remember, after being on the internet for a while, when the www standard was being adopted and all the web pages started popping up. It was so cool to see the kinds of content people were using it for. Then we got search engines like altavista, and it honestly seemed magical. It was like this egalitarian utopia, where all this knowledge was available to everyone; it was hard not to feel like it was the start of an amazing new phase for society.

        So it was just soul crushing to me when we first started seeing intentional manipulation and misinformation. Search results that were skewed by paid advertisements or google bombing, propaganda being pushed into discussion forums, and all the fake news… it all represented the end of that amazing new phase. Heartbreaking.

        • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I am too young for that, but I do remember discovering the concept of wikis and finding it amazing that websites could now be written by their audience.

          A fairly dead concept by now, nowadays the entire rest of the Internet is more interesting than wikis.

        • JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Oh man when i was young and go to play and explore with my Neopets, downloading things on limewire & chatting on msn messenger after dialling in to the ‘internet’ was magical.

          I should check on my neopets, it’s been… A while.

    • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Maybe there are people that are outside of America and don’t have direct impact of who wins the election and they don’t have to blindly praise biden. Trump is a piece of shi but acting like criticizing Biden is some kind of a foreign conspiracy is funny.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Maybe it’s because saw this exact fucking shit swing the election in 2016 and a lot of people have no patience for it left.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Criticising him? No.

        Criticising him and going “I’m not gonna vote for genocide Joe”?

        Yes.

        If you were Putin, you’d do everything in your power to see Trump elected. And if you pretend Russian troll factories don’t exist then we know you’re in one.

    • rustyfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I remember there, when the Russian Internet connection went down, and for like a day all those kinds of posts nearly evaporated.

      Oh shit, I remember this one. For a short time Reddit became a loooooooooot friendlier. Not friendly but friendlier. You could have a nice conversation with someone opposing your views and it came to an actual trade of insights. I valued that a lot. No fucking derailment with stupid ass nonsense and childish jibes. (At least for the most part. Reddit is after all Reddit)

      • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, for sure. And before that time I used to wonder how much truth there was in the idea of the Russian troll farms - it seemed a bit like a conspiracy theory, even though it was pretty well documented in the Mueller report. But that day was such a dramatic demonstration. The whole site suddenly shifted so much to the left, and the toxicity dropped so much lower.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m just trying to remind them they aren’t welcome in decent places. I wouldn’t go to .ml or worse, Hexbear or grad, if you paid me.

    • If you’re not going to vote for someone you otherwise would because of a single issue, you’re a single issue voter.

      I thought it was you decided who to vote on based on a single issue. If you can can about multiple issues, and any one of them is a deal breaker, then wouldn’t you be a multi-issue voter?

      • I thought that’s what I wrote, but if it didn’t come across right, I apologize.

        Single issue voting means how you vote is determined by a single issue. That includes not voting at all because of a single issue. What I meant to say above is that if you would vote for X, but choose to not vote at all because of one issue, you’re a single issue voter. A single issue is deciding your vote.

        As Rush once sang:

        If you choose not to decide You still have made a choice

        • But if you would have also not voted because of issue Y or Z are also dealbreakers, then you’d be a multi-issue voter. If candidate A believes Y and Z, but not X, candidate B believed in X and Y, but not Z, and candidate C that believes in X and Z, but not Y, so you just didn’t vote, it would be clear its 3 different issues that you care about, but for each candidate, it would be a single issue why you aren’t voting for them. Would that just mean you are a single-issue voter for 3 different issues?

          But if candidate A believes in Y and Z, candidate B believes in Z, and candidate C doesn’t believe in any of them in a particular election, in that case X alone would mean not voting for any of them.

    • forensic_potato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      While I do absolutely agree that single issue politics is a real thing like you showed, literally the only reply to your comment was only “if you are a single issue voter, you’re an idiot too”.

      So I also think OP has a point here and we’re talking more about the people who use the term as an ad hominem attack, which I certainly have seen plenty of. And now Lemmy has provided us with yet another example of people taking something legitimate and turning it into a weakness/attackable offence. Like some trolls and racist people on the right now talk about DEI in negative terms

      • Fair points. I’m guilty of just saying “single issue voters,” without elaborating on every comment. That could easily be seen as an indirect ad-hominem attack. Maybe I should make a copy-pasta response for whenever I see someone arguing for single-issue decision making.

        That said, there are justifiable single-issue decisions. If Trump was spouting rhetoric about shutting down all support of Israel, yeah. I can stand behind folks “switching sides” over this. Free Choice, ditto. 2A I have a harder time with, but that’s because there are usually so many other issues that you’d think are more important. Not my decision, but I have less sympathy for people who think being able to own a gun is more important than the ability to unionize.

        Anyhoo, like I said: fair points.