• Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    This bill’s sole purpose is to make it look like the CIA doesn’t already have full control over their moderation (just like reddit’s content mods)

    They don’t want to ban tiktok lol, the fascist himself just made a totally cool and not cringe page like a week ago.

  • admiralteal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Really resembles a bill of attainder, to me.

    We’d ALL be much better off, and a similar outcome could be achieved, by putting to law strict data security and privacy rules. Plus it wouldn’t inevitably be challenged on very reasonable 1A grounds. But that isn’t as politically possible because so many – especially conservatives – don’t believe in the liberty of privacy.

    • harderian729@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The entire point is to open up the market for an American company.

      Anyone who thinks otherwise isn’t paying attention to the world around them.

      The data privacy issues will still exist. The ‘engagement’ issue will still exist. But it’s okay when Americans screw over Americans.

      • Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s a big part of it too, but i think an even bigger part is the use of TikTok in counter culture. It is definitively the largest gathering of counter culture on the web. They fear losing control of the narrative. The intelligence agencies already control Meta and google. They have members on TikTok’s board. Social media is an avenue for consent manufacturing for our government, and any deviation from their manufactured line is unacceptable.

        • harderian729@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          To what? There isn’t an issue. People willingly give up their information, and that’s okay with me.

          They should get to make that decision.

          • Bye@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            YES

            honestly I’m ready to ban the internet. This whole thing was a huge mistake. We are not evolutionarily equipped to handle this much connection.

            • Mac@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              I’m a big fan of the small connections but the large connections just dont seem to go very well.

              however, it does enable mass organization which is pretty important.

              • Bye@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                We had the million man march and stuff way before the internet. I’m not sure why I think this, but I think it may prevent organization more than it enables it.

  • Mastengwe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    If anyone thinks TikTok has made life better in any was since before it existed, they’re too young to remember life before TikTok.

  • ViXY_DBC@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I would remind people:

    Tiktok is the only major social media platform that doesn’t demand a phone number to register or verify identity.

    It is also the only social media platform that isn’t controlled by Meta or Google (reddit is now effectively in bed with Google).

    Establishing and enforcing industry wide data security is a good thing, killing the only somewhat independent social media platform is a dictatorship style move.

    • remotelove@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you were trying to make an argument to support TikTok, it’s a bad one.

      While it may not be directly controlled by the CCP, the Chinese government still has the power to coerce ByteDance’s executives to cooperate on a whim. Tech moguls have already been disappeared, so it’s fairly obvious money can’t buy anyone complete protection.

      Depending on what your news sources are, ByteDance has likely been sharing US data with China. This is magnitudes worse than a company selling data for profit to advertisers. Because of the prevalence of the app, it absolutely has the potential to be weaponized. It doesn’t take much to understand how a shitty little app could be leveraged to cause chaos. It’s about who really holds control over the company.

      In my own personal opinion, short form videos are fucking cancer. All media companies that promote them need to fuck off.

      • CeeBee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        While it may not be directly controlled by the CCP

        It basically is. The concept of a “company” in China is different than in democratic countries. They’re effectively CCP corporate offices.

        • remotelove@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          The smaller “independent” banks are the same way. The only people that have the influence to start large companies are people that are deeply rooted in the CCP or have close ties to their central bank, which is CCP controlled.

    • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Fun fact: TikTok was caught behaving like malware on android and abusing bugs to get information it shouldn’t have.

      There is no need to compare it to anything. Anything that does that should be struck down hard.

      • Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Fun fact, Facebook was caught doing the same thing with its apps. Hell, Facebook was caught FORCING YOUR MICROPHONE ON AND RECORDING YOUR CONVERSATIONS

    • dysprosium@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Tiktok is the only major social media platform that doesn’t demand a phone number to register or verify identity.

      Ohh such a relief! It’s not that it tracks a billion other things from the user

      killing the only somewhat independent social media platform is a dictatorship style move.

      Feels weird calling a super big company “independent” in a good way

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It is also the only social media platform that isn’t controlled by Meta or Google (reddit is now effectively in bed with Google).

      Even if it weren’t puppeted by the CCP, ByteDance still makes a little over half what Meta does. By essentially any definition, it’s a massive company that’s in the same league as Alphabet and Meta.

      Also… “The only” one? You’re literally on the Fediverse now. Smaller, yes, but you didn’t say “the only major one.”

    • Mastengwe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It also is a huge security risk in that it will steal your info and send it to china.

      But don’t let this get in the way of praising them for…. Not asking for a phone number?

      • ViXY_DBC@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        What social media platform isn’t a security risk? Goggle knows everyone down to a T, and Meta’s platform has been used overseas for pretty awful things. The US government has not find any instances of information being systematically stolen by TT and send to Chinese government.

        Being concerned is good, being concerned only about tiktok and without actual evidence is leaning into unsavory racial bias.

        Again, shore up data security laws, enforce data security laws, don’t play on racial fear and trample 1st amendment.

        • Mastengwe@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          “They all do it” isn’t an excuse to allow any ONE of them to continue doing it.

          If we can take one down- we can eventually take them ALL down.

          • ViXY_DBC@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Except you can’t take them all down. And nobody is talking about taking them all down in the US government.

            I am absolutely not in favor of shutting down all social media platform.

            Look at how our maim stream media censoring news coming out of Gaza, it’s hard to imagine the current level of outrage against the genocide being generated without tiktok and Instagram.

            They now serve an important function and that is vital.

  • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    One part of me feels this is overreach, but social media is doing as much harm as it is good. We need to rethink the internet.

      • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The only good thing it does is spread news that would otherwise be suppressed by local media and governments. The human-on-human interactions are mostly abusive. Sure, there are good people and good conversations… but they are drown in a sea of trolls and anger management issues.

    • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      even if we did, I don’t think people would be interested in using a replacement without a recommendation algorithm that’s powered by tracking every millisecond you spend in an app in order to tailor the content to your interests.

      also, storing video is p r i c e y.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Nothing of value is lost if TikTok goes away.

      What would really happen is it’ll be sold to an American company.

      • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Tbh as an asian, the easiest way for me to access american content is Tiktok. So i will get sad if it gets banned.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          All that would happen is an American company would buy it. That is the part that makes me uncomfortable. If it’s a threat, it shouldn’t kept.

    • K3zi4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Instagram Reels is the exact same model as tiktok, but that’s allowed to stay, because of murrica and freedom or something.

      The only real concern with tiktok is the worry about data collection. But if they cared about that, then they’d pass laws on it. It’s only because it’s not a US company profiting from the data collection of their property. Sorry, I mean free citizens.

      • JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Thanks a heap, i just switched from Liftoff to Sync last week (when liftoff stopped working) and thought i was just going to have to live with those ads. Much appreciated!

        • Zoot@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Thank you thank you thank you. I know this is like beginners info for blocking ads, but using the internal web browser for Boost and what not made reading articles a fucking nightmare.

          Now I can actually see that these articles have a story, and aren’t just all about hot milfs in my area.

  • i_have_no_enemies@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    After AOC calling out hamas supporters now biden is banning islamist social media website

    thank you, i can’t tell you how infuriating it is for an apostate of islam ,who only has internet as a way to show opposition to this cult, see internet not only turn a blind eye to islamists but also encourage their proselytism

    thank you so much honestly 😭, i wish i could give you all hugs.

    biden24

  • filister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I would be all okay with this move if the US is imposing equal data protection and privacy rules to all American companies as well.

    • The_Pete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      But it would also be replaces by something else equily as shitty. The federal government doesn’t move fast enough to block stuff like this by name.

      I has to be something broad, and enforceable. Tic tok has already been doing its thing for like 5 years.

  • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I am not surprised that this is happening. What I am surprised is how many people have no idea how fucked up this law is or its implications, and are therefore defending it because “lawl le crinj china app xdxdxdxdddd”

    Bro. This law literally bans the usage of VPNs to access foreign sites and services. Even China won’t fuck with that, and they invented the concept of having a separate internet that abides by their censorship. VPNs are legal and common there. Also, like, this thing we are using? The Fediverse? Where half the servers are not in the US of A? Say goodbye to IT as well.

    Y’all are cheering for the building of “The Great Firewall, but painted Red White and Blue” but don’t even realise it because you think an app where some kids do dumb dances is literally the devil.

    Anyway, enjoy your self-made dystopia, I’ll be here in the third world laughing at your faces.

    • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      There are no first world countries without fully paid public healthcare.

      So ironically, they’re also laughing from the 3rd world ;)

      • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I would like to note that my shitehole of a third world home country has public healthcare.

        It’s not excellent, far from it, it’s in fact very flawed: It’s underfunded, depending on the area you’ll be “queuing up” for your consultation for so long that you’ll either recover on your own or drop dead, and sometimes doctors have to push ghetto treatments because the real thing is too expensive, so if you have the option, you’d rather not.

        … But it exists, it genuinely saves lives, and also – In existing it also drives down the price of private healthcare, meaning that middle-class folks (like me!) can afford it without being sent over the poverty line.

        Crazy how that works. We’ve been Murica’s bitch for two centuries now, but life here still seems miles kilometers better than over there.