• BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Ahhh, so it’s not actually about protecting the lives of the unborn then? These embryos are not biologically different than the natural ones from a pregnancy, yet they get different treatment.

  • Szymon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Pretty sure the ruling outlasts his tenure, next guy won’t give the same slack.

  • ZeroCool@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I would still encourage the people of Alabama to be highly skeptical of any assurances made by these Republicans in the state. Their word is worthless.

    • athos77@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      At a minimum, it’s dependent on who’s in office: if they have the info, someone else can come into office and charge you until the statute of limitations expire. And if they decide it’s murder, the statute never expires.

  • Neato@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Selectively enforcing laws is unjust and discriminatory. It’s why it took so long to get gay marriage on the books. Pigs and prosecutors would only target poorer people and those who couldn’t defend themselves and cherry pick cases unlikely to win on appeal.

    This is being used so Alabama shitheels like Steve Marshall can persecute through prosecution all the people he doesn’t like while letting his buddies off. All laws should apply to all people equally.

  • Billiam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Wait, so fertilized eggs in a uterus are living beings with souls and should be protected all costs (up to executing women who seek abortions) yet eggs fertilized in a petri dish are just discardable medical waste? We’re up to “God has to blow the breath of life right up a woman’s vagina or else it doesn’t count”?

    As the saying goes, if it weren’t for double standards Republicans wouldn’t have any standards at all

  • Nougat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Your Supreme Court says they’re children, and you’re pre-emptively saying you’re not going to prosecute crimes against children? For shame.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    }set foxworthy -on

    If yer Attorney General is saying “I swear I won’t enforce the law - it’s just too crazy!” . . . Yuh just might be a redneck

  • TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The US constantly makes everything illegal, then picks and chooses what it wants to prosecute for whom and when. It means you’re never safe. You can always be arrested or have your life ruined depending on the mood of the police, agents, and DA at various moments in time.

    And these moods and choices vary greatly depending on your socioeconomic status and skin colour to name a couple things.

    It’s a disgusting practice. Write better laws if you don’t mean it.

    • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yup, it’s the Russian-era autocratic way. Nominally be a society of laws, but the laws are so rigid and unfair that everyone breaks them, which gives cover for political will to entirely decide who goes to jail.