>I’ve told you that I’m not answering you,
feel free to find the interogative i posed.
you should know i am earnest. i’m learning how to snark. i try to say what i mean and mean what i say.
sometimes i do try to make jokes, but I am not sarcastic.
>I’ve told you that I’m not answering you,
feel free to find the interogative i posed.
>You’d be well served to learn how this works because the real world
don’t be condescending
i never asked you to provide any evidence
>“if you don’t provide the evidence I’m entitled to, it means you’re wrong!”
this is a strawman and deeply dishonest. i provided a reasonable method for establishing the veracity of your claim and i was unable to substantiate it.
don’t spread falsehoods and i won’t correct you.
>You see, my not producing evidence because of simply being asked for it- does not make what I say untrue.
i know that. in fact, i went and provided all the evidence i could about it, which is that it hasn’t happened in at least three days, but it’s my guess that it’s made up entirely.
>Anti-vote/biden… it’s the same
this is misinformation
thank you. it must be a reference to something, but i don’t watch tv any more.
>There are tons of anti-Biden trolls
being anti-biden doesn’t make someone a troll, and it doesn’t mean they’re saying not to vote.
>What I say is true.
if it were true, you could provide evidence.
i linked the search, but you seem to want to ignore it. anyone reading this can see that.
this is incomprehensible to me. can you try it with two or three sentences?
I did a search and couldn’t find any evidence of it except people claiming it exists, or refuting that claim.
all I’m doing is correcting the record
it makes bypassing drm a felony
your accusation of bad faith is, itself, bad faith
>But what would prevent you legally from jailbreaking your own car?
the digital millenium copyright act of 1999
this is an allusion to evidence, not evidence itself.
bye