• TheFriar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I love how in the “FAQs” of that agreement, there is no “why.” Which is surely the most F of the A’d Q’s.

  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I have 5G home internet. Downloads are twice as fast (and uploads 8x faster) than cable here—the next fastest available service—for half as much. No arbitrary bandwidth cap, either.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    The fact that this is even legal shows how incredibly weak the regulations are. They are essentially non-existent, with the consumer ripe for maximum exploitation. Just forcing people to buy is legal at this point huh?

    Incidentally, Spectrum is my only choice thanks to an exclusivity agreement, but we aren’t forced to pay. We can actually opt out at our location. 5G home internet is way more reliable and faster in my area.

    Regulate! All businesses are self-interested!

  • nevemsenki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s so weird to read these articles. I live in a shithole country, but even here fibre internet with 2.5gbps speeds is easily available… 5G ain’t bad but against it never feels replacing that kind of connection for me.

    • accideath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well, I live in Germany and I know quite a few people who have internet so bad IPoAC would be a valid option. You can get fibre but A it’s fucking expensive and B you need to live somewhere where there actually is fibre. Most people either have DSL or cable. DSL is “slow” (depending where you live up to 250mbps. Most places only get up to 100mbps) and expensive (although not as expensive as fibre). And cable is fast (up to Gigabit) and a bit cheaper but the biggest pile of garbage I‘ve ever seen.

      • nevemsenki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, travelling to Germany a few times, even data always sucks, both wifi and mobile. We joked that Germany has the beet economy in EU because the net is so bad people don’t waste so much time on Facebook…

        • accideath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Mobile data highly depends on the carrier. We have three distinct mobile networks: D1 (Telekom), D2 (Vodafone) and E (Telefónica aka O2) and Telekom is the best by far and O2 is a joke although comparably cheap.

          We used to have four but about ten years ago (whoa, time flies) Telefónica bought the fourth carrier, e-Plus and the E1 and E2 networks merged. Probably was a smart business move because they’ve become less of a joke since.

          • nexusband@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            As a customer of both Telekom and O2, i highly disagree…the Telekom net most of the times is shittier than the O2 one - even though the O2 one sometimes looses connection all together, in those cases the Telekom connection doesn’t have Internet at all either.

    • daniyeg@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      here we are getting some limited “5G” (bandwidth is fucked it’s basically early 4G speeds but with a 5G written at the top) here and there, but most cable connections are still on ADSL2. if you want fibre you have to pay for replacing the cables and congratulations now your bandwidth maybe increased from 8 Mbps to 16 Mbps but now your data cap costs are twice more expensive and you basically limited your choice to 1 or 2 ISPs.

      the irony is now that almost everyone are on the mobile network the speeds are basically the same as landline connections but data caps are much more expensive. internet here is just fucked.

          • AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            When you said ADSL and 16Mbps I thought to myself no other country in the world could possibly share this experience

            That makes two of us lol

            Also where the fuck do you have 5G? I would consider myself lucky at 4.5G (but it works alright)

            • daniyeg@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              mostly around my university but i have also seen the 5G symbol pop up at random places. it’s never consistent though outside uni. the speeds are almost the same as 4.5G so it really doesn’t matter.

    • UnityDevice@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It actually seems common for less developed countries to have better internet than the more developed ones. Germans always complain about their internet, for example. I believe reason is simply that your country laid down lines relatively recently, so they’re compatible with high speed internet, while Germany laid down their lines 30 years ago, so they’re fairly shitty in comparison. It tends to be a lot harder to convince governments or bosses to replace something that seems to work fine, and it can be costlier too.

      • madcaesar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yea its similar to why the electrical lines and plugs suck in the US, they were just here at GEN 1,while others had to wait so they got better versions.

      • nexusband@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It has absolutely nothing to do with the lines, but the headends. Coax is very capable of transmitting lots of Data fast. Due to the tree topology of cable however, the headends have to be extremely fast. If everyone on the tree of 100 has 1000 Mbit, that headend needs to have 100 Gbit of capacity. Most of those headends however cap out at 10 Gbit and sometimes service up to 300-500 ports. German cable providers cheaped out and didn’t upgrade their infrastructure for quite a while. The coax line technology didn’t change in the last 30 years.

        • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          German cable providers cheaped out and didn’t upgrade their infrastructure for quite a while.

          This is always the real reason.

          Rich people being cheap.

    • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I live in the US in a pretty large city and I would never even think to replace my fiber with 5G. I’ve never seen 5G get above 25 Mbps, when I was getting those speeds with COAX 10 years ago.

      I pay for 1Gbps fiber now and will never go lower.

      • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I wish I had fiber. I get 100 Mb from T-Mobile 5g and 80 from spectrum. I’ve had two significant gaps in coverage from T-Mobile, but I also had internet during a power outage with a generator and an extension cord, which was huge.

        For 50$, I’ll take that over a more consistent 80mb for 100-120$.

        Definitely a rural thing, less 5g congestion and all. a physical line makes way more sense in a city, ideally fiber, but 5g internet has a pretty big niche.

      • redshift@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I get 500 Mbps on 5G home Internet on a bad night. I would still take fiber over 5G any day, but it can be much better than you’ve seen.

  • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m paying 10 euros a month for the plan on my 4G router because even though I have fibre available aswell I just don’t feel like paying 30€ a month for it. 70 bucks however? That’s ridiculous.

  • cosmic_slate@dmv.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    This isn’t strictly limited to cable companies, telecom wants their pound of flesh too.

    Verizon seems to be doing this as well. My former apartment complex used to let you choose between Comcast or FiOS and now it’s locked to FiOS only. Before you could get your own account and deal with Verizon directly. Now it’s some weird reseller-esque platform specifically targeting MDUs.

    Now before the foamy-dweeb parade of “omg who wants Comcast” rolls around, do note: Verizon is limited to 1000/1000 (well more like 950/950), and I could rarely get more than 600mbit both ways. Comcast recently introduced 2000/200 in my area but is intending to go faster, and they’re farther along in their plans than Verizon’s multi-gig strategy.

  • terminhell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Dare I say, but this could be use case for something like starlink. Of course, also mounting the dish with non-penatrating mount or in ground mount.

      • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I opted to send back my starlink unit because Bells wireless connection at 40/10 was more stable and had less than 1/2 the jitter

        • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yes, I have Starlink. It’s significantly better than the DSL I had, but I will switch to fiber the instant it becomes available here.

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s incredible as long as everything is 100% optimal. Because my co worker’s yard has trees just barely too tall around it his connection drops all the time. Heavy storms also cause issues

          When it works it’s great. But it doesn’t always work. 5g is MUCH more reliable than Starlink.

    • corbin@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Starlink wouldn’t change anything in terms of cost, if a specific ISP is force-bundled into a lease then it doesn’t matter which alternatives exist. There isn’t a technical solution to this problem, only a legal one.

      • terminhell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I guess, ya if the service is bundled in the lease and non negotiable/declineable sure. But not every apartment complex is like this. Sure, they may limit you to one or two options. But I still think it would be a viable alternative.

  • OwenEverbinde@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Alternatively, it’s possible cell companies like T-Mobile will lobby against these anticompetitive agreements, since it does reduce their number of potential customers. I don’t like cell company lobbying any more than ISP lobbying, but in this case, let them fight.

    Something tells me T-Mobile’s got a little too much class solidarity to have any interest in reducing the profits of Charter Communications.

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It is a loophole in the current Federal Communications Commission’s regulations, where these kinds of deals are supposed to be forbidden. The Commission doesn’t seem to like it either and may close the loophole in the future, but the regulatory process takes time.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The usual shithole country where capitalism and the free market has been allowed to run completely rampant. In Germany it’s even illegal to not allow users to use their own modem and router. You are entitled to use any company that serves your street. It might take a while longer if your building isn’t connected yet, but a landlord can’t just prevent you from choosing a company. Same with electricity providers.

    • cosmic_slate@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      On what basis?

      The FAQ page also mentions “a landlord may refuse to allow other service providers to offer service to tenants.”

      • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        So other commenters have opinions that I think are rational, but the part that I think is key that they’re missing: Tenant Unions.

        I have some (in my opinion) tyrannical yet lazy land lords/property managers at my current apt, and have attempted to form a tenant union. Apparently no one agrees with my level of disgust at our treatment, so I’ve kind of wiffed at the effort.

        Which is to say that it takes real work, but it can be done and there are resources for you, but that’s the first step: don’t go alone.

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          You’d be more effective taking all of that cash and flushing it down the toilet. It would have the same result, and it would force the landlord to pay for a plumber.

      • db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The landlord can do bulk billing, and they can refuse to allow other companies to service the property. As a tenant the first one doesn’t mean you have to buy in to that, and the second doesn’t apply to wireless providers. Both things are a basis to sue.

        Also this was a simple search away. Please do the simple searching yourself from now on.

        • flawedFraction@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Also this was a simple search away. Please do the simple searching yourself from now on.

          Please don’t post one word comments and then get annoyed when someone asks you to elaborate.

        • cosmic_slate@dmv.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I am disappointed in the carelessness of your reply lol.

          Right now this is like refusing an amenity fee because you don’t use the pool. You can disconnect the service, but the $60/mo or whatever charge is still being billed to you.

          The FCC is fine with it as long as the landlord bundles the service with your lease and the service provider isn’t blocking other providers.

          Is it right or fair in my opinion? Absolutely not.

          Sure, you could probably find a lawyer but that’ll only work up till the point a judge goes “well, the state doesn’t block these fees and this is outside of the purview of the FCC”.

          …and can’t forget the gamble of paying $300/hr+ for a lawyer.

          • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            This is an addendum to the original lease. They don’t have to sign it and the landlord still has to honor the terms of the original lease.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It can, in regards to network saturation in rural places that only have one tower whose use spikes during holidays, not to mention being immune to signal jammers and interference.

  • PeterPoopshit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    How the fuck can they not compete with 5G? Is using the advantages of their wired infrastructure to just provide customers with the same service as always but without the bandwidth caps, effectively overcoming the 1 major disadvantage of mobile internet, really that hard?

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Cable definitely does have a capacity and speed advantage over 5G in most cases. But 5G is plenty fast and reliable for most people these days, and it’s cheaper because there is no last mile maintenance. T-Mobile doesn’t need to repair a bunch of decades old coax line every time the wind blows.

      • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’ve seen that last mile, you’re lucky if the cable is buried more than one shovel length down. It’s the tech equivalent of the porn trope of using spit for lube.

      • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Perhaps they should have invested in infrastructure with the government handouts they were given to do so?

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          They spent it all blocking access to the fiber lines that are already there and padding the wallets of their execs.

    • mellowheat@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I think if you allow a bit of simplification, it’s essentially the same thing as Ethernet vs Wireless as your home network solution. The other is slightly better in performance and reliability but way less flexible. That’s why 5G is winning.

    • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      How the fuck can they not compete with 5G?

      According to the article, for the last few decades the cable and telecommunications companies have avoided upgrading infrastructure to increase profit margins, while wireless companies have been building and upgrading towers like mad. Wireless companies have also successfully lobbied to gobble up a bunch of frequency allocation to increase their bandwidth.

  • fne8w2ah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Just like the cable TV companies that will stop at nothing to trap their customers in their overpriced af prison?

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    People need to start speaking out more against this type of behavior, and I don’t just mean in blogs and forums. I mean write the FCC, write the Attorney Generals in your state. Dare i say, write your congressmen (yeah, mine are the apathetic, pro-business politicians who don’t really care about the little people too).

    Make some noise folks.

    Seriously, companies like this get away with these shenanigans because we the people have been beaten into submission for so long that we believe we are powerless (I’m guilty of feeling this way). We need to start changing that. And nothing is easier than writing letters these days.

    File a Complaint With the Attorney General

    File a Complaint - FCC