• werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      But remember, vote for Biden and not for Trump. If you play nice and behave, a group of unknown people that you didn’t vote for might actually vote for Biden so he can stay president for another 4 years. If you voted for Trump, I guess that group of electoral college people might care enough to still vote for Biden? But who cares anyway. Neither Biden nor Trump actually do anything. They just tell the rest of us to do as they say…I’m being sarcastic, vote Biden! Please! Electoral college dudes… because we know you’re all dudes … Please could you just vote for Biden this time?

  • rikripper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    From what I understand, Trump alone could not make the US leave NATO. And despite how despicable some Republicans are, I think he’s made enough enemies within his own party to never see that actually happen.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    For those that want to break everything, this is a feature, not a bug. The magats would rather send the world into the toilet rather than not be able to “own the libs” (and women, and POC, and LGBTQ and immigrants, and anyone with one iota more education than them, etc.).

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The United States has maintained longstanding support to NATO. Most recently, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024, enacted on December 22, 2023, prohibits the President from unilaterally withdrawing from NATO without approval of a two-third Senate super-majority or an act of Congress.[71] This bill was a response to Donald Trump’s repeated expressions of interest in withdrawing from the organization.[72][73]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Withdrawal_from_NATO#United_States

    That link also claims the Greens want out of NATO, so I guess they see eye-to-eye with Trump on that one? Honestly, it makes me less likely to support the Greens now that I know that.

    • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The US Greens are largely subsidized by Republican funders, and Green presidential candidates have been dinner guests of Putin. The US Greens aren’t an independent environmentalist party but are a GOP stalking horse.

        • cygon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I don’t know about other European countries, but Germany’s greens have kept a relatively tidy ship compared to other parties.

          Which is why Russia is puppeteering Germany’s far-right to view them as a kind of combined enemy, you often hear them use the term “Linksgrunversifft” / “left-green-soiled” towards people who hold the wrong opinions.

          Didn’t they push a similar joined term in America 2016? I remember encountering the words “liberal elite” a lot, probably an attempt to redirect the resentment against the uppity conservative establishment towards liberals instead. I guess it worked.

        • Thorry84@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          What are you talking about? Every “green” party I know in Europe is very much against the war in Ukraine and holds Russia responsible. They are about as anti Russia as it gets. Green parties are also very much pro Europe, they want a stronger Europe with more members and cooperation in the EU. Green parties are either center-left or totally left leaning. Green parties usually get a big chunk of votes, not only marginal like in the US.

          Russia is heavily funding and supporting the right and far right parties, who are almost all against a unified Europe. Russia is doing their best to break up the EU with campaigns of misinformation, bots, advertising and direct/indirect funding of right wing political parties.

          And Russia is succeeding as well with the far right on the rise all over Europe. They already got Brexit through against all odds and are now working on breaking up the rest. In Germany the rise of the right is still fresh, so there is a lot of resistance. But other countries are much less resistant.

          • rayyy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Russia is heavily funding and supporting the right and far right parties

            Welcome to the new warfare that caught the west totally off-guard. The “poorly educated” were the first casualties and have been recycled into the Russian forces.

            • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              I’m genuinely curious if there is no way to stop all/most of these influence & astroturf ops, will we just see a walled off internet with hefty firewalls or content moderation at national ‘borders’? It’d be a huge upheaval to the internet, but otherwise we’re stuck trying for a 100% defense against state cyber attacks

              • cygon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                My personal take here is that playing defense is a losing game and that we really need to kick off another 1968 movement. A counter culture that is infecting and firmly against Russia and conservatives.

          • Draghetta@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Thanks for the info. I admit my experience was based on the Italian greens who are irrelevant and generally left leaning, which in Italy means Russophile like anything left of the dems, and on what I know of the German greens, which is that they lobbied for getting rid of clean energy and ramping up the use of coal / gas / petrol, all Russian imports.

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I believe it’s forever, unless found unconstitutional or congress changes and presses a replacement.

          The 2024 part of the Bill name is just so you know which fiscal bill it is.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                Well… there’s two possible ways you could have found out for yourself-

                1. You could have just clicked the link and saw which Green Party I was talking about.
                2. You could have read your own headline and figured it out.
                • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I read the link and there are references to greens in several countries. And I suppose I could have assumed you were talking about the US, but I’ve never heard of a Green Party in the US.

                  Now I’m sorry I asked. Holy crap.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I wonder if the rest of NATO would allow this. Like, okay, the US “pulls out” and stops all their commitments to NATO. It would still be in NATO’s best interest, should Trump eventually leave office, that the US retain its membership. Create a paperwork “penalty box” that allows Trump to feel like he’s won but allow future, more sane Presidents, an easy on-ramp back into full membership.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I wonder if the rest of NATO would allow this.

      I imagine he’d “pull us out of NATO” like he “pulled us out of NAFTA”. Which is to say he’d slap a new “America First” label on the old organization, take a few weeks off to vacation at a bunch of European golf courses, do a big signing ceremony in front of OAN handi-cams, and yell “I Made America Great Again” into the faces of anyone who thinks this is baby-tier bullshit.

      Create a paperwork “penalty box” that allows Trump to feel like he’s won but allow future, more sane Presidents, an easy on-ramp back into full membership.

      I think the real end-game is about goosing US military exports. Trump threatens a pull out, on the condition that all the member states boost their domestic military budgets. Then those member states buy more shit from American MIC contractors. The MIC rewards Trump with political capital. And Trump takes kickbacks in the form of club memberships and no-show jobs for his extended family.

      My man loves to bluff about taking his ball and going home. And he’ll happily sign a big executive order with an oversized sharpee, proclaiming “We Aren’t In NATO Anymore!” whether or not we actually left, because it plays well with his base. But the real influence that the US has in NATO is more about Trump extending/denying France or the UK or Finland or whomever with navy and air support to hold business assets in former colonies.

      Trump knows that and he knows it offers him immense leverage, given how much these other countries rely on US power projection. So he’ll very likely get a new wave of EU militarization at the enrichment of American MIC, because its the only way the other NATO states decouple their reliance on the US for “free” military support.

      • maynarkh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        That said, that can backfire. Several major member states of the EU are already talking about proper remilitarization that wasn’t needed since the wall fell. There are nascent beginnings of a joint European army and a joint European MIC. Why would EU states spend more money on US stuff that it already thinks it doesn’t need, if it can just use the same money and pour it into the FCAS project for example, creating jobs and keeping money at home?

        Orbán used to be a huge Trump fan, and he actually went and started spending more money on the military when the was Trump’s thing. Only it wasn’t American F-35s he got, it was a bunch of German Leopard 2A8 tanks and French Eurocopter EC725 helicopters and Norwegian NASAMS launchers. There is also a stated intent to skip 5th gen and get into the FCAS if and when that materializes.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Oh definitely. US military technology is exhaustively oversold and carry enormous overhead costs that dilute their real practical military capacity. Our new war in Yemen (much like our old war in Afghanistan) illustrate the problem neatly, as we launch $10M missiles at $100 targets and still can’t get the Gulf of Adan safe enough for traffic to resume.

          Why would EU states spend more money on US stuff that it already thinks it doesn’t need

          Because they’re buying a relationship with the US Military more than they are buying the hardware itself. The promise of US Aircraft Carriers and US Satellites and experienced US military leadership coming in as the primary driver of military engagement means kicking back a billion or two to keep the Americans friendly is mostly worth it.

          But if the EU grows more internally coherent as a military power… yeah, that could very easily go away. We could be staring at another Great Rival in an increasingly fractured global rat race if the Europeans establish themselves as self-reliant.

  • Plap plap 𓁑𓂸 @lemmyf.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    No he won’t.

    He made this exact same campaign promise back in 2016 and he didn’t pull the US out of NATO when he became president.

    The only thing he did was to call out the majority of member countries that weren’t paying their agreed about share, causing (primarily) the US to make up the difference.

    • yggstyle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I consider this campaign fundamentally different than his first.

      First and foremost - he is a grifter and conman at the end of a con with enemies on all sides. This is a desperate man. If elected his goal is to first wipe his slate clean via a pardon - and then will be to retain power thereafter.

      To achieve these goals he will do anything. What makes this terrifying is he genuinely believes himself to be the smartest person in the room. He is a shortsighted idiot that is playing chess with blinders on while the rest of the world is playing 4d chess.

      Other nations fears of another term with that man are not unfounded.

  • SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    It would backfire like Brexit. Imagine the USA openly shunted by all former allies about their war crimes and other international crimes. The US forgets they currently can get away with a lot, and they do, because they are also an important ally. If you remove their NATO support, what reason is left to whistle ignorance?

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Backfiring to Boris looks a lot different than backfiring to Trump. Boris Johnson, even though he’s a piece of shit, still cares about England. Trump only cares about himself and would let Putin waltz right into the War Room if he wanted to.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Brexit was a disaster because the UK economy was third-place-and-shrinking in the economic block. They had no leverage.

      NATOXIT would be a much bigger deal, because the US is the premier global military power and the single largest exporter of weapons and associated tech.

      Also, the NATO thing is pure bluster in order to assert leverage over the bloc, while Brexit was a dog-catching-the-car scenario. The Tories invented so many fictions about how awful EU membership was that they couldn’t accept what generous concessions were offered. Meanwhile, Trump will happily take a big personal kickback for a small concession on arms sales.

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The US forgets they currently can get away with a lot, and they do, because they are also an important ally

      I think it’s only Trump who forgets this not the US. I am not even sure he understands it really

      • Ross_audio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s not only Trump.

        It’s also Trump voters and voters who stay at home and let him back into office.

        I’ll be pleasantly surprised if a majority of American voters turn out against him.

        Last time it was about 1 in 3 voted for him, 1 in 3 voted against him, and 1 in 3 didn’t show up.

    • gun@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The US getting held accountable for it’s war crimes? Sounds too good to be true.

    • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m not in favor of leaving NATO immediately, but to say that Europe would have much leverage is disingenuous. The US enjoys many strategic advantages over Europe besides NATO membership they have:

      Large wealthy consumer base with healthy demographics, worlds most advanced military, fastest growing net exporter of energy, worlds largest blue ocean navy that has kept sea lanes open for trade, etc. etc.

      Europe is incapable of projecting power beyond EU boarders without US logistical support. They lack the necessary logistical support to do it at scale. They also can’t perform SEAD operations and don’t have the satellite and intelligence gathering assets that the US has.

      In short they can take action against the US at their own peril.

        • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Canada can’t defend their own airspace without US assistance. They have 78 VERY old and tired CF-18s that date back to 1982 to patrol an airspace larger than the US.

          They can nope out of whatever they want and get taken over by Russia and China. (Shit even India doesn’t respect their sovereignty and runs Special Ops on their soil.) However I very much doubt the US will let that happen.

      • wanderingmagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s not about Europe. It’s about the massive fuckton of TS//SCI shit shared directly with FIVE EYES and NATO, which shows the exact locations of US strategic nuclear weapons, strategic weapons protocols, intelligence gathering techniques and sources, etc that can almost immediately be sent directly to Russia and China as soon as the US walks out the door. It’s about the first line of defense missile detection radars, the cryptologic keys, Global Campaign Plans, Contingency Plans, PBNZ coordinates, non-overflight coordinates, FLAGWORDS, etc.

        And that’s not all - you also lost all international trade, everywhere, forever. Bye-bye middle eastern oil and Chinese manufactured goods, because all your oh-so-friendly shipping lanes and freedom of the seas is now contested waters full of could-be-privateers. If the EU, by pure necessity, pivots Eastward into a pan-Eurasian bloc, that’s game for the US.

        • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Breaking away would be painful but there is nothing you’ve stated on the Op Sec side that can’t be changed or moved. Early warning radars are forward positioned for the safety of our allies. Shuttering them would hurt them more than us.

          Cheap Chinese goods are a thing of the past. The CCP under Xi is openly hostile to the West. Due to the one child policy their demographics are even more terminal than Europes or Russia’s. The US is in the middle of the largest industrial build out in modern history because of this.

          We don’t need Middle Eastern oil, the US is the fastest growing net exporter of oil and gas. If anything they compete with our energy products. Europe and Asia would be hit harder by the US pulling back from guaranteeing freedom of the seas for the global order. If US ships were not on station off the coast of Yemen you would see a larger disruption of trade. Europe has contributed very little to this operation which they are arguably more dependent on.

          The US also has the best demographics of the Western world, we are the largest driver of international trade. Europe needs our healthy growing market and workforce more than we need theirs which are in terminal decline.

          • maynarkh@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Look man, if nothing else, we’re subsidizing your insane deficit spending and keeping you from hyperinflation by keeping USD as currency reserves. The EU and the US are comparable sized economies, and I could also say the EU is held back a lot by the still present divisions across its members. An external rallying event would most likely catapult integration and economic and military strength.

            All that said, there is no reasonable way forward for the US or the EU without keeping the current world order, which means keeping a strong alliance. If the US and the EU decide on a trade war, that would most likely mean insane inflation and economic breakdown, and a Chinese new world order.

            So let’s stop comparing dick sizes, get all our fucking fascists back in their holes, and let’s try making a friendly alliance work?

      • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Don’t know what consumer base you’re referring to, but other than the wealthy keeping the economy afloat by maintaining their expenditures on creature comforts, most people in America are broke as fuck.

      • owiseedoubleyou@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Of course the whole “encourage Putin to attack other European nations” thing is stupid in typical Trump fashon, but less american imperialism is always welcome.

        • sirjash@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          How exactly will leaving NATO make America less imperialistic? Was it the safety of the mighty European security umbrella that enabled the US to be like that?

        • nutsack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          that’s fair. i am generally anti-imperialism as well, but i don’t understand what happens when nato goes away in this case

  • xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Trump will do whatever is in his power to do, legal or not. As long as Putin tells him he is in the tough guy maffia club, ensuring him that he is invincible.