What’s your opinion? Does google really “not work” anymore? Are there any better search engines? Why did the quality of search results go down? I honestly stumbled onto this question through this music video, what is ironic in it’s own way i feel…

  • worfamerryman@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think google made the web worse with SEO. Sites have to be designed in ways that users and creators do not really care about so that they may show up in search results.

    If I have a site about star trek and it has all the relevant information that the user is looking for, then do not derank my site because the text is not a specific length or whatever other unrelated stuff is there.

    I think there are some things that are worth while, like I think https sites are preferred over http sites. I think that this is a good thing to promote.

      • parlaptie@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        As much as I’ve come to loathe Google, I think even that is a bit unfair to them. Search engine optimization is a result of the existence of search engines, because being at the top of the results is always worth good money.

        Back before Google was the top dog, there were numerous search engines, and I’m pretty sure people shared tips on how to get further up on the results even then, they just didn’t use the term SEO yet.

        Google became the dominant search engine because it gave better results than anyone else, because it wasn’t so easy to manipulate your ranking on the results. But there were always sites that wanted to be on top even when they shouldn’t be. Google stayed ahead of their game for some decades, but now it looks like they can’t or won’t keep it up anymore.

        • BlueNine@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wonder what it would like if they rolled out the OG circa 1998 page-rank algorithm on todays web. What would that algorithm find if we ran it now? Would it be garbage or would it undercut all the SEO and find good stuff?

          I have a hunch that the current search is bad, not because they cannot do better, but because it is profitable for it to be this bad. The most powerful SEO tool is probably your checkbook.

          • tburkhol@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s definitely an arms race - if it’s cheaper to pay an SEO to get your pages shown, then you pay the SEO; if it’s cheaper to pay Google advertising, then you pay to play. I’m sure Google is constantly tweaking their algorithm to filter SEO techniques to get better, authentic results, but it seems like a losing battle at this point.

  • abhibeckert@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What’s your opinion? Does google really “not work” anymore?

    Depends what you’re searching for. For some searches I’ve given up on using it. For example I just purchased a new TV and one of the features wasn’t working. It took me several hours of Googling to figure out how to fix it — almost every result offered by Google didn’t contain an answer to my question.

    Are there any better search engines?

    ChatGPT works well for some searches. Especially if you pay for GPT-4.

    It’s pretty impressive how ChatGPT is better than Google despite never being designed as a replacement for Google. I think when someone applies the same technology to a proper search product, the result will be really awesome. Time will tell who manages to pull that off - it might even be Google.

    Why did the quality of search results go down?

    The main issue, I think, is all the websites these days that exist exclusively to show banner ads. Many of them are packed with information that Google’s algorithm determines might be relevant to the user, but the algorithm is wrong.

    The websites want you to click on an Ad, and you’re a lot more likely to click an Ad if you give up, don’t find what you’re looking for, and decide to buy a new weight loss gadget instead.

    I’m sure part of the problem is Google itself is an ad company. A lot of the things they could do to fix this issue would harm their own revenue.

  • HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I need an engine where if I put something in quotes it appears on the site, visible to the human eye. sure sure it can ignore case, but otherwise the damn word or phrase should be there.

    • donio@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is such a simple ask and yet it seems almost impossible with modern search engines. They all seem to insist on second-guessing you. It’s a lack of respect for the user: “We know you are dumb but don’t worry, we will figure out what you really mean. Oh and don’t forget to watch your ads.”

      My other pet-peeve is that they will almost never admit that maybe they just don’t have any good hits for the query. They insist on pushing some irrelevant crap in your face instead. I guess it comes down to needing to show the user something so that they can mix in those ads.

    • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep, if I put a word in quotes with a minus in front of it, it used to mean that search results with that word would not show, but now it does not matter because “AI haz learn”

      • nouben@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Actually i still use this feature but without the quotes (eg -keyword1 -keyword2 …), few weeks ago it still worked

    • asap@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I need an engine where if I put something in quotes it appears on the site, visible to the human eye

      I can confirm this works on Kagi:

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve just recently started using Kagi. It’s great, it’s fast, I love that I can raise, lower, or block certain sites in the results.

        However, $5 a month for up to 300 queries is pretty steep for the average user. Well, not for the average user (apparently the average google user only searches 100 times a month) but I used up the 100 demo searches over about 48 hours, mostly just researching for responses to lemmy comments.

        I subscribed anyway. And I understand search engines are not cheap to run. But time will tell how much this will end up costing in the long run, and if it’s worth it over a free one with an ad blocker.

        • coldredlight@beehaw.orgM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I became a paying subscriber for kagi today. The way I justify the cost is it’s saved me time digging up technical information at work and that increase in efficiency is worth money to me. Also, I hate ads and SEO crap, and $5 isn’t really that much these days. I’m trying to reduce my reliance on Google so it’s nice having an actual superior search experience, even if I have to spend a little money for it.

  • SimonSing@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Google is almost impossible to use when I search for solutions to maths problems. The first few pages are dominated by those sites gaming Google’s algorithm and their articles usually don’t help.

    • thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup. DDG is my go to. Every once in a while I have to use Google, but it’s rare.

      Also, buy the Wolfram Alpha app if you want math problems solved easily.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Does anybody else find when using DDG for research that it’s waaay too aggressive about “correcting” your query to something more mundane?

  • willeypete23@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    From googles perspective, you, the user cost them money. Their revenue comes from ads. The brands don’t was to be associated with anything controversial so the results are tailored to be as PG and clean as possible.

  • bear_delune@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Google is absolutely useless now, nothing but SOE farmed rubbish.

    It’s become completely unusable.

    I’ve moved over to Kagi 100%

    It’s well worth the money for the amount of control I have over my experience. Being able to black list, downplay or uplift specific sources is awesome

    • dolle@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve also used Kagi for two months and can really recommend it! I switched from Google to DuckDuckGo a few years back, but Kagi is just so much faster and also generally has better results.

    • aksdb@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like the idea of Kagi a lot, but the pricing structure is not yet the right one for me. I fully support the idea of paying for search - I paid for Neeva and now that this has shut down I pay for Brave Search Premium. But I despise having limits, that’s a mental burden I don’t want. And with Kagi that would mean I have to pay $25 a month, and that’s not worth it for me.

      • RoboRay@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re not limited to a set amount of searches if you pick a cheaper Kagi plan… the plan is just for how many are pre-paid. You’d have to do six times the pre-paid number of searches on the $5 plan to get billed $25, so there’s no point in paying $25 monthly unless you’re actually doing thousands of searches every month.

        But either way, there is no limit.

        • Pigeon@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Idk, that might even be worse imo. I don’t want to go back to the days of surprise bills like you’d get because you went over your alotted minutes/texts/GBs, or to have to think about whether or not a particular search is worth $.

          • RoboRay@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The typical surprise bill would still be a lot less than your monthly payment for the infinite searches option. You probably aren’t going to unknowingly perform several thousand more searches than you normally do without noticing it.

            Anyway, your other option is to scroll through infinite ads trying to find the few actual search results.

            Pick your poison.

          • Dave@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can set a price point you get a notification, and another price point where there’s a hard cap. So I’ve started on the $5 a month plan which is 300 searches plus 1.5c per additional search. Then I set a $5 limit on the extra searches, so I’ll never be billed more than $10.

    • parlaptie@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Being able to black list, downplay or uplift specific sources is awesome

      I’ve never heard of Kagi, but yeah, those features sound like a godsend. I’d love it if you could have that on a search engine that isn’t pay to use.

      • mrmanager@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You will love it. I switched about 6 months ago and it’s wonderful. When I was using duckduckgo I had to use the !g keyword to search Google sometimes. With Kagi, it’s basically switch and you forget Google exists.

        Set it as default and you will see what I mean.

        • notfromhere@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve tried Kagi several times and the results for me are not good. I’ve pretty much gone back to Google unfortunately.

          • Dave@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Can I ask what kind of searches you’re doing? I don’t find google all that great, so I’m curious what you’re searching for where google gives you good results.

          • 🦊 OneRedFox 🦊@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            But it’s paid

            Unfortunately it’s looking like that’s going to be the future of things that aren’t shit on the internet, whether it’s paying for search, or donating every so often to your Fediverse admin to help keep the lights on.

          • mrmanager@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yup try it and set as default in the browser. You will start to see a lot of sites that never showed up in google also. They have these “listacles” in search results where they group relevant sites into a small list, which makes it super simple to go to them for results.

            If you want a sample search, try “best tv shows 2023” or something like that.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Has anyone created a firefox plugin that allows you to filter out search results based on snippet and URL rules? That would solve the problem on most search engines as the unwanted results are usually repetitive and obvious.

    • Nomad Scry@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not exactly what you’re asking for but uBlacklist is a plugin that lets you blacklist websites from showing in your search results. I’ve only been playing with it for a few days but it seems to work great for Google, DuckDuckGo, and Bing. Qwant is a little wonky.

  • bermuda@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Google is definitely iffy for me, which is why I’ve been bouncing between alternates. A lot of people like to complain about how google is filled with ads and spam results like Pinterest, but even then it just doesn’t really seem to give accurate results anymore, and even when results are accurate it’s very surface level. From what I found, it loves to push listicle articles and such when googling a new topic, as opposed to say, Wikipedia or an encyclopedia article. Like if I search about Barbie, I’ll probably get a bunch of ScreenRant-esque articles before I get the IMDB page. There have been dozens of instances of me searching for controls for video games and getting clickbait-y articles, some of which barely even make an attempt to answer the question, before getting an IGN or GameFaqs article that’s to-the-point and answers my fucking question.

    There are definitely better search engines out there, but they all have their own flaws. DuckDuckGo is pretty bare bones and can also give poor results if your search is too vague. You have to adapt to that one. Others like Brave have AI to help out with summaries and stuff, but Brave’s management is “problematic” and so some people might not want to support them.

    TL;DR: on google, not only is there ads and spam, but it’s just hard to find answers anymore. Everything is clickbait. And with other options, they are good but they also have their own major flaws that some might find unappealing.

    • any1th3r3 [he/him]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly, I’ve noticed this over the past few months, actual relevant results are being pushed much further down the stack.

      If you want to explore alternatives, I’ve been using SearXNG, a so-called “metasearch engine”, where you can get a combination of various search engine results, based on your preferences. It’s pretty good, when it works (it tends to get rate-limited fairly often… or at least some of its results / search engines do, which can get annoying).

      • Kata1yst@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can also selfhost SearxNG with modest hardware and side step the rate limits. I love it. Happy to answer any questions

        • sylverstream@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          How does it compare to Kagi?

          I can’t self host it, what’s the problem with using an existing instance?

          • Kata1yst@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I haven’t used Kagi much, but my understanding is that Kagi has their own indexing and you can customize your search by ranking your results.

            SearxNG runs searches against many other search engines and then uses an algorithm to rank the results sanely. So less customizable but also the net you’re casting is much wider.

            You could easily self host on a free-tier instance in Oracle cloud or AWS for a year, or even just run it on a laptop. But if you really can’t see a way to do that you can of course use one of the listed instances, you’ll just be more likely to bump up against rate limits since you’re sharing limits with many other people.

      • Kikkertje@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        These days I often just skip the first 2 pages and go straight to page 3 for my search results to be able to find anything slightly resembling what I searched for.

      • Hangry @lm.helilot.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Self-hoster of a searxNG here. With docker, your can spin your own in 1 minute top. I’ll never go back to any other search engine, this is the best (imho).

    • Hangry @lm.helilot.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Brave’s marketing has always made me uneasy, but it was more like a vague thought. This why I’m intrigued by your opinion. Do you have examples of their “problematic” management?

      • bermuda@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s of course biased, maybe for some people it wouldn’t be problematic, but the CEO of brave has historically donated to organizations and California state bills that opposed same-sex marriage. This was around 15 years ago (2008 and 2009) so maybe he’s changed. But for some people, that might be a dealbreaker. He resigned from Mozilla in 2014 because it came to light that he had made these donations. He apologized in 2014, but for some people that might not be enough.

        (note: I’m not trying to be biased with this. For some people reading this, his apology might be perfectly fine for you. But, for others this might be enough to be labeled “problematic.”)

      • millie@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I honestly have never used Brave largely because its logo makes me feel like the developer is way too into WoW. Weird reason to judge a software probably, but sometimes it’s best to trust your gut.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have notice that in the past you altered your terms a bit amd got different results, now the search gives me junk so I alter the phrase and same junk shows up. So it is not as effective at doing a deep search these days that actually matches the search terms.

      • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Have you tried searching incognito? I find the junk is generally tied to profiles Google has on me; they decide based on the data they’ve built up what I should really be looking for.

        Searching incognito tends to return results closer to what I got 5 years ago.

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I run tracker control, and only essentail scripts can run, all ad stuff is totally blocked.

  • Storksforlegs@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It hasn’t worked for a while. Even a year ago it was considerably better.

    I can’t believe it, but Bing is now the better search engine. What is happening to the world?!

  • Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    My Google results change like the weather. Sometimes I can’t take it anymore and use Bing but quickly switch back as it’s worse. There’s no replacement yet, but you need more google Fu than ever before.

  • Schedar@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Google is one of the worst offenders, with constant effort to force you to login, sponsored links etc but it isn’t unique to them.

    AI (or human) generated rubbish, optimised for SEO is making it harder and harder to find what you actually want. This isn’t entirely new, there has always been a battle but it does seem like now with the AI push they are winning and we (the users/consumers) are losing.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know, I didn’t expect dead internet to hit search engines first. In hindsight it makes sense, what with the amount of computing they can budget for each result, but it seemed like such a successful, established thing. Man, normalcy bias is a bitch these days.

  • Thalestr@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    SEO and AI-generated clickbait have basically ruined most search engines. I’ve yet to find one that can really tackle this properly. I believe Kagi offers higher quality results but I can’t really verify that myself as I don’t have an account with them.

      • coldredlight@beehaw.orgM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m still on my trial period but I think I’m going to pay when it runs out, I’ve been really happy with it so far. I think it’s saved me a good chunk of time at work I would have wasted digging through Google SEO crap so it feels like it’s worth spending a few bucks on.

      • asap@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have the $10/mo account but I’ll disagree with @mrmanager@lemmy.today that it’s worth the money.

        Don’t get me wrong I wouldn’t go back to Google/DDG, but while I can afford Kagi’s monthly cost I don’t believe that everyone can, nor do I think it’s an appropriate cost for a search engine.

        I feel like I am an average search user, and I easily burn through 1000 searches a month. I’ll possibly be upgrading to the $25/mo unlimited account.

        If you’re used to doing conversion searches like “100 USD in EUR”, or “2.5g in oz”, or even “20 * 12%” - you get charged for each of those. That doesn’t seem so reasonable to me.

        • aksdb@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I also considered Kagi a bit and I think it might work if I start to change my search behavior. I got too used to abusing search engines as a quicker way to open websites (I could use bookmarks for that) or for bangs (I could use the browser itself for that).

          If I managed to untrain myself from this and start using tools for their core-purpose, the limits of Kagi might indeed be more than enough. But currently I am too lazy for such a deep change in my daily workflows.

      • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I got work to pay for it. It is pretty good, and I like the lenses function (focus on just forums or other ways to sort). I can’t say that it’s necessarily better in general than startpage.com, which is anonomized google (gets you out of the filter bubble though). I feel like Kagi is very slightly better, maybe 10 percent at most.

        I also don’t love the hard ID they have on you for payment. They claim not to track you but they certainly can, and I’d argue better than Google can if you use startpage.com or whatever anonomized version.

          • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Interesting - I never thought of that, mostly because the overhead is kind of insane (and I don’t actually think bitcoin is anonymous, but in this case good enough). I was thinking for your average person, they’re going to pull out a credit card or debit card which is a hard ID. Certainly more than if they browse to startpage.com for instance.

            • asap@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              and I don’t actually think bitcoin is anonymous

              You can pay with XMR:

              I definitely agree with you though, it is a negative for Kagi. It would be nice if they let you pay direct via crypto or other methods.

  • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The core limitation is that the problem is dramatically more complex than it was when Google started. The number of sites were smaller, there was much less dynamic content, and there wasn’t a sizable portion of the internet committed to an adversarial relationship with search engines forcing everyone else to go to the same extremes just to play catchup.

    What this means is that you’re looking for answers in a much larger search space, and the indicators you used to use are much less reliable. You have more resources to try to balance that out, but there’s so much straight trash to weed through that it’s pretty difficult to do.