You really love posting this comment in every post about steam, don’t you?
You really love posting this comment in every post about steam, don’t you?
Sounds like a disingenuous argument.
If you’re a content creator and you can leave, you should. If you can’t, well obviously you shouldn’t yet.
Definitely better than this outdated version. Nobody uses Python2 unless they want to at this point
No we haven’t.
We don’t prove negatives in science, or in medicine. We just know that in the studies we have performed, we have not noticed any meaningful effects and we can conclude there is likely no observable benefit to taking the drug for that purpose.
It won’t replace entire ground crews, because the machines will break down. You’ll need someone to service them, and a small team to act in case there are no backups.
Just think of all the horse trainers that will be displaced by the invention of cars! Those cars won’t be paying taxes, that’s for sure.
Ok, but AI isn’t going away. So if these companies stop serving open access, the ONLY people that will use them will be the people who can afford the server/processing time.
This article isn’t about usefulness of the models to normal people. It’s about profitability of the models to the corporations that serve them.
Paying close attention is ironically very important if you’re interested in foraging
No need to try again. They already are implementing additional costs. 2 steps forward, 1 step back.
You may underestimate the amount of money the Saudi government has
The Japanese scientist who discovered it
It’s what lonely humans crave!
Tried to store documents in paint and it ruined the documents, 0/10
I’ll let you know how my file cabinet art show goes
Got one of those in Tallahassee. Can confirm about the many jokes.
… what?
This sounds like the pitch of a tech bro who just heard someone use the term API but doesn’t actually know what it is
I assume you looked up if it was correct to be able to say that does know the answer. In that case, why did you bother with ChatGPT?
Never take anything generative AI produces as factual unless you check it. It is not designed to produce factual information and is very often wrong and confidently incorrect.
For the love of… stop using generative AI to give you answers to questions! If it doesn’t have an answer it just makes it up completely.
It took long because you’re on the free tier and you were rate limited. The idea that a human is writing your answer is so laughably absurd I genuinely don’t know if you’re serious.
This song immediately popped into my head after seeing them
The LLM isn’t the issue here. It’s generating coherent speech well enough.
The problem is that there is no mechanism for identifying odd or out of place items in the stimuli fed to the model. This mechanism (separate from the LLM) would be placed between the CNN (image recognizer) and the LLM (text generator). What typically happens is the CNN recognizes subjects and items in an image and passes the list along to the LLM which generates a description. Since the LLM doesn’t actually have access to the original image, you can’t ask it to look for unusual things the CNN did not provide it.
The result is not surprising. People just don’t know how these models work and so assume they can do anything.
They’ll get the picture in the fine letter so make sure you give them your best one-finger salute