Eww.
What could possibly go wrong?
If the New York times wants to continue to be irrelevant entity in the world than they won’t take him up on that offer.
Are you saying that if NYC wants to continue to be relavent then they should agree?
No they’re saying that the NYT (the fucking NEW YORK TIMES) is irrelevant and will continue to be if they don’t switch to AI.
Which is even worse
I guess thats enough perplexity ai for me
Do it. I fucking dare you. It’ll be fun to watch a media powerhouse and a douche meth lab burn each other down.
Wow, replacing striking staff is super illegal in France and I’m sure using AI instead of workers would still be a slam dunk in front of a court. I’m shocked that this isn’t outright banned there.
The US president fired striking workers and 50% of the population want to go back to then.
The U.S. political Overton window being where it is today, I’m pretty sure it’s much more than 50%
That is a FANTASTIC idea because AI is KNOWN to be SUPER STABLE and REALLY GOOD at what it’s Designed to do! NYT will save a TON of Money fixing their DailyAI instead of Paying Workers!
Cool. That’s bound to work out really well. I mean, what could possibly go wrong?
fucking scab. and I liked perplexity too. won’t be using it again.
So he’s an industrial scale scab.
And there it is, the actual reason the owning class are jizzing themselves over AI:
Finally they never have to worry about their underlings ever again, now they truly are everything and as self-reliant and self-made as they always told everyone from private school.
cool, never using them again
This made me laugh so hard, thank you for sharing OP
After many years of people misusing the word Luddite, it’s time to bring back its actual meaning.
Oh, okay. Well obviously fuck this guy. I can’t imagine being enough of an asshole to see staff go on strike and your first thought is ‘let me pitch my shitty AI!’
It’s the entire point of AI, to replace the workforce.
If your entire workforce is ai and you don’t have any humans then how do humans who don’t have a job pay for your product?
The entire concept of replacing the workforce with AI falls apart when you spend more than 2 seconds thinking about it. Only way it would work is if we actually got rid of the entire concept of money.
Corps have been complaining for years already that people aren’t buying enough. Millenials are killing this industry and that industry because we don’t consume enough - “enough” being whatever level they’ve decided we should consume. They feel entitled to our dollars, whether or not their product or service is any good.
If they were smart, companies would lower prices to be more competitive and incentivize people to buy more. Instead they’ve doubled down and posted armed guards at the store exits to intimidate the customers they have left. They’ve slipped data collection into every interaction. It’s pretty obvious they’re not playing the long game anymore.
They’re not thinking that far ahead. They’re thinking “how can I make the lines go up this quarter?”
That’s the entire point of capitalism. To generate as much profit from as little expense as possible. Unfortunately capitalism is predicated on a human workforce earning income to pay for goods and services, so at some point the economic engine will shutdown and capitalism will have killed capitalism. Either way, once the level of robotics + dumb AI is more cost effective than the available workforce in any role, that role will be eliminated. Once general AI is achieved and (especially once) the robots can build and repair themselves, the proles will either get star trek or whoever commands the killbots (including an AI) will rule humanity and inherit civilization.
NOTE: could happen at any time, but my bet’s on it not happening for many decades; possibly not for hundreds or thousands of years.
No it isn’t. It’s the entire point of some (well, many) modern AI companies, granted. But “the entire point of AI”? absolutely not.
