• FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    This makes no sense. Why would a company want their product to be sold out? The goal is to balance supply and demand. So they SHOULDN’T sell out. It’s not a limited edition product or anything. This post is sensationalized as fuck.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think they’re implying a comparison to the PS4. It was notoriously difficult to get a PS4 for months after it’s release because it was constantly sold out

    • JargonWagon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      He’s saying that it’s a good thing it hasn’t sold out yet, allowing it to have plenty of supply for Christmas season. It’s a good thing due to the PS5 previously being sold out everywhere last Christmas.

      While I think it’s still too high a price point for me personally, it’s at least a logical increase in price because supply and demand has caused it to be increased.

    • almar_quigley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ps5 pro, just got released. But it’s entirely too expensive for what its offering over base ps5, doesn’t have a disc reader, and while I love my base model there really aren’t that many games taking advantage of it so having to pay more for remastered last gen games doesn’t feel like a good value for most folks I’d imagine.

    • zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Especially when the differences to the base console are barely noticeable. It’s bad when the reveal has to zoom in to sell the difference

  • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    This happened with the ps3, the chief at playstation at the time said we wouldnt be able to find them at retail. My friends and I made some fun snapping pics of them sitting on shelves.

    We were way into the game news scene at the time.

    • scops@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The PS3 also had damn few games to play at launch. If it wasn’t for Sony’s decision to ship it with a BD-ROM drive it probably would have been a total flop. Home theater nerds saved the PS3.

      • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        And I’m thankful for that because, when the promotion was right, I bought one. Warhawk, MAG, Demons souls and KZ2. What a great generation of games.

  • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I would have paid $700 for the Pro if it came with everything the 30th anniversary edition had, and maybe a little more if it also included the Portal.

    Unfortunately, Sony can’t stop tripping over their own incompetence and limited the units to 12,300 for a reason that can be simplified to be: “money.” So it sold out in less than a minute to scalper’s bots and can now be found on eBay for five times the price.

    • Crampon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t get the hype for the anniversary edition.

      I haven’t heard it would launch, and one day I saw people offering 2000$ for one on a trade site. My only thought was “wow, glad im not a fucking idiot like these guys”.

      I sure might be stupid, but not that stupid.

      • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s mainly the colors, but it came with some extras as well. And a paperclip.

        Like I said, about $300 overpriced even with the additional items and only hyped due to limited edition. How many times has Nintendo released a console in NES colors without making it limited? Just a ridiculous move by Sony.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Nobody wants to pay $310 ($80 for a disc drive, $30 for a stand) more for a machine that looks better if you pause the game and squint hard.

    Here’s a good example:

    Can’t see it? The PS5 Pro has added reflections on Venom’s back and right shoulder. The texture on the door of the Jeep is marginally improved.

  • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s not the price point. Most of the people who’d be in the market for one wouldn’t buy it because it doesn’t take discs. When I bought my PS5, I specifically bought the disc version. So I’m not going to ‘upgrade’ to a machine that doesn’t have one and only really offers ‘improved performance’ as its main selling point. It just doesn’t make sense.

    If you’re new to the platform and are used to buying only digital, it might be more palatable. But as someone who’s been with Sony since the very first PlayStation: I’m gonna pass.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t know about recession, but I know I’ve hit a personal inflection point with prices where I’m just sick of the bullshit and only buy if absolutely necessary, or on sale.

      Everyone is so fucking greedy, everyone wants just 5 more dollars bro to the point where the consumerism has been driven out of me.

      I actually have money to buy shit, I just don’t want to anymore because nothing seems to correspond to its value anymore.

      A new car? 35 k for a fucking base kia, gtfo out with this shit.

      New phone? 1.2k for the same screen bullshit as the last 5 years.

      Same with this PS5, they are pricing this shit like it’s lifesaving medicine, when in reality it’s just shit no-one really needs

      • tux7350@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        35k for a base Kia? Hell naw, I bought a fully loaded 2024 hyundai elentra hybrid for 34k out the door. Base Kia K4 is 22k plus tax title and reg. That’s like almost a third less than what I paid lol

    • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      We also don’t give a shit.

      If you own a PS5 already, it doesn’t offer you much and if you own a PC, it offers you less.

      • NecroParagon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I have a PS5 with the disc drive, which I paid extra for. I don’t see any reason to get this when it doesn’t even come with that. The performance of the base PS5 has been very good. If it’s just a hardware boost, I don’t really need it. I don’t get the purpose of upgrading. The battlefield games I play run like butter, and the new titles, like Dead Space that I’ve played also run great.

        This just runs better? Not necessary to me.

        And I do own a gaming PC. I just prefer having a dedicated game console for a couple good reasons.

      • Anas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        you did not just make a whole comment responding to one single downvote

      • AWittyUsername@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m not arguing for or against being a recession. But the sales for this console don’t prove or deny a recession, they just show that either no one actually wants this thing or Sony has managed to misjudge demand.

      • TheBraveSirRobbin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Not the down voter, but as a day 1 PS5 buyer who could afford the pro I will just say they didn’t offer any value to me. I’ve played 1 game on the PS5 that I couldn’t have on my base PS4 (Demon’s Souls) and I could play the original of that on my PS3. They promised all of this great stuff on the PS5 and under delivered. Why would I put down the $700 why would I spend that when I hardly even use my PS5 and even when I do I could’ve just used my PS4?

  • Matombo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    well i guess sony found the mark what they can charge and what not. don’t expect the next one to be cheaper

  • PunchingWood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The price alone isn’t the problem.

    If the launch came paired with great new games it would be a whole different story, like as if it would be a new generation console like a PS6 with new exclusive games I doubt that the price would even be an issue. People would still complain, but they’ll get over it.

    From what I’ve seen it’s practically only PS5 ‘Pro Enhanced’ games, which are mostly games that have been around many years already. Plus it doesn’t have a disc drive so it’s more expensive if you want disc support too.

    I still got an original PS5 (with disc drive), I mostly only played PS exclusive games and a few games that I prefer on console, it’s perfectly capable of doing 4k and/or high resolution graphics and framerates depending on the game. I don’t see a reason to upgrade to the Pro at all. And I think new players are more likely to just go for the PS5 Slim instead.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The last thing we need is Pro consoles getting exclusives. That would be PS6 in all but name.

      The PS4 Pro made some sense. The PS4 was underpowered on launch, and 4K became pretty commonplace shortly after they launched. It still had an underpower CPU, but at least you got an upscaled HDR 1440p image for most of the time which is good enough. Even PC gamers accepted upscaling to 4K once they gave it a fancy name and told them it was exclusive.

      But here, you’ve already got a choice of pretty RT mode and 60 fps mode, and if you really wanted both of those at the same time, then you could lash out a big pile of money for a PC.

      It’s 700 notes for half a generation of slightly prettier gaming. It’s aimed at the “turn everything to ultra and have a fit when it drops below 60fps” PC gaming demographic, who have no need for this.

      • PunchingWood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m afraid that if they keep making ‘superior’ versions of the same generation of consoles that we’ll end up with ‘semi-exclusives’ anyway. Simply because those will run a lot better on the more expensive hardware, and what I’m most afraid of is that a lot of developers will get lazy in optimisation, because why the hell would they bother if they can just make it run good enough on the ‘high-end’ platform so to speak.

        And bet you that Sony will encourage developers on this too, because they’re gonna want to have reasons to sell the Pro, especially if there are no exclusive titles to promote it with.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          They were already lazy because the hardware was powerful enough to hide a lot of sins.

          FF7 Rebirth for example. It looks much better on the Pro, but frankly, it should have looked much better on the base console. And it came out well before the Pro was announced.

          But at the same time, the majority of PC gamers are happily still playing at 1080p. Resolution was always overrated and an expensive thing to chase.

          The only semi-exclusive from last gen was Cyberpunk, and I can’t really see things being much different. If a game engine was capable of running at 60 if you reduce the graphics, they’ll still offer that. If it wasn’t, then the Pro won’t be able to run it faster either. It’s pretty much the exact same CPU under both.

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          That may be the way consoles go.

          We aren’t seeing the kinds of innovation happening in hardware that justifies dropping backward compatibility and the AAA gaming market hasn’t released games in the quantity they did before.

          So Sony and Microsoft can update the hardware in a way to maintain backwards comparability and game companies have the option of developing to the current generation only, both generations with different graphics, or the older generation.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t think most PC gamers are running 4k. With all the price shenanigans in the GPU market over the last 5 years, actually achieving 4k has been an expensive journey for anyone doing it. Especially when games play just fine at half or a quarter of that.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          They’re not. Steam survey has 4K monitors at under 4%. Well over half are at 1080p and below. There’s exactly 1 GPU in the top 10 above the nVidia x060 series.

          The way things get reviewed, you’d think 4K was a minimum. I suspect the majority of high end cards out there aren’t even used for gaming.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            After I posted I was reminded that it’s still common in FPS games to brick the graphics so there’s less hiding spots. But also my graphics card is like 7 years old and runs everything I’ve come across except Star Citizen. (Which is its own whole level of fuckery)

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Yep. This gen has been pretty barren when it comes to AAA games that aren’t remasters/remakes and it’s not just exclusives. The handful of AAA games I want to play run perfectly fine on my low spec PC. Sure not at 4k60, but upgrading my pc or buying a PS5 pro just for those few games just isn’t worth it.

  • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Its funny how people are clowning on a 700$ console but buy phones for twice as much happily every year.

    • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I know some people upgrading Pixels every year because with trade in and sales they only need to pay like $200. I don’t think Sony will take an existing PS5 though…

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Who even buys a new phone every year?

      People usually clown on Apple users specifically for doing this, but every Apple user I know uses their phone for multiple years. In fact, Apple was giving users multiple years of software support while Samsung and others were only doing 2 major Android updates for flagships. Google was the one to FINALLY change the status quo in the Android world, so that’s good at least, others seem to be following suit. Previously, Android users I knew would just keep going without software updates. Luckily they mostly still receive security updates for a few years after the OS updates stop.

      None of the manufacturers gives you a compelling reason to upgrade every year anymore. 10-15 years ago the changes were big because the first smartphones were shit compared to what you had just a few years later. Between the original iPhone and roughly the 5 or 5s, every upgrade was pretty major. Same on the Android side.

      Now I think you’d have to go from an 11 Pro to 16 Pro to notice anything. And good news in that department, if you still have an 11 or 11 pro, that still got the iOS 18 update. Actually, so did the older XR and XS.

      The only reason to buy a new phone every year nowadays is because Apple, knowing EXACTLY what they’re doing, changes the camera arrangement every year so clout chasers would know you have last year’s model. It’s stupid as fuck, but luckily none of the people I know fall for it.

    • lustyargonian@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      When iphones went from 400 to 999, I do remember people having an outrage, soon after samsung also raised their prices. It is that moment for console gamers right now.

      • IamAnonymous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It definitely is. The PS6 is going to be around $1000. When the phone prices went up I started to change phones every 4 years instead of 2. And now I will get the Slim instead of the Pro, even though I always get the latest and greatest.

    • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Almost nobody buys a new phone every year. And if a phone is your only computing device, buying a high end one isn’t a bad idea.

      The $700 console is overpriced relative to its power and has pretty much no games.

    • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think the demographic is slightly different. The people buying consoles might know more about what they’re buying and do some research about it. Whereas the newest iphone getting released all the normies will flood to it and get the newest shiny apple product after they hear about its release.

    • Clbull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      What puts me off is the lack of games this generation. I’m not spending £700 on a console where the only worthwhile exclusive that isn’t already on PC is Astro Bot.

      If that’s the best thing that Sony and Microsoft can give us after three years of releasing their current consoles, then we’re well and truly on the verge of another market crash.

    • randombullet@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Every year? The only person I know within my immediate vicinity has phones ranging from 2019 2022.

      Also something you use probably 3-5 hours a day vs something you might use only a few hours a week isn’t immediately comparable.

      A modern day necessity vs a relatively niche item.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The PS5 in general has just felt like a nebulous console. I don’t know if it’s just me not being as connected to console gaming anymore or what, but there’s no PS5 games that are “must play” or anything that I’ve seen/read/heard hype about that has made me really interested. Partly there was the Covid years where it was apparently facing shortages and during that I just switched my mind off to the idea that I’d ever buy one. It’s been out for years now though, but nothing about it makes me care to move on from our PS4 that’s still chugging along.

  • Vespair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Why buy a console when for roughly the same price you could buy a PC that does everything the console does and more? Yeah $700 is an insane price for what is effectively a toy.

    • GrindingGears@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Also $700 isn’t going to buy you much of a PC if you don’t have one already. Maybe mid spec 1080p.

      Not that I’m arguing for PC. I’m pro-console in most circumstances. Only for power modders, power gamers or power purchasers would I maybe argue that PC is the better route. Everyone else, console 100% (except this joke of a console).

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It’s about the same as the inflation-adjusted PS3 price, but here’s the thing: the PS3 had a difficult first couple of years. If not for the Red Ring of Death, Microsoft could have come out ahead that generation. One thing Sony is good at is capitalizing on its competitors’ mistakes, and combined with price reductions on later models, they pulled out a victory. Being >$750 inflation-adjusted dollars at launch wasn’t why it won.

    • corbin@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Because PCs are worse for living room/controller gameplay, you have to deal with Windows or Linux, and many other factors?

      • Noxy@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I very much enjoy playing PC games with a controller on a big TV away from my desk. With an optical HDMI cable I’ve never had issues pushing 4k, 120hz, and HDR. Bluetooth mice and keyboards are incredibly common. And 8BitDo’s “Ultimate” controller has been really great over 2.4ghz.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    A quick look on eBay suggests the only people buying them seen are scalpers.

    Hope they all get fucked on this one.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is why I like seeing new tech with a high launch price. Even if I want one, I’m patient, and it would be worth seeing a bunch of scalpers get fucked from just assuming that initial demand will set the price even higher.

      I hope they thought they had to wait in an uncomfortable line to grab the ones they got and that the store only offers exchanges and no refunds.

    • Lianodel@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is a bit off topic, but it made me nostalgic. My first argument on reddit over a decade ago was with someone, either a scalper or a contrarian, trying to argue that scalpers provided a useful service that made things more fair, rather than assholes creating scarcity so they could profit selling a solution to a problem they themselves create.

      So yeah, I hope they all get fucked on this one, too.

      • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oh they all say this shit, must be included in the standard issue dickhead guide book