So they got all that money from Uncle Sam’s CHIPS Act only to lay off 10,000 employees and make themselves “lean”. Govt funded unemployment.

    • smb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      maybe the root-cause is less the publicly-traded part but rather the total lack of any consequences?

      but yes i totally agree, any company publicly traded will get a payed-for-CEO after a while and latest at that point is where no problems are resolved any more, but instead are IMHO always created on purpose.

      • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Problem with publicly traded is that there is no personal risk past the price you bought the stocks for. You paid $ 1,000 for some stocks of “evil chemical corp”? Now your financial interest, and thats the only measureable one, would want them to pollute for a damage of $ 10,000 respective to the stock value if that increases your stock price to $ 2,000, as long as the risk of them having to pay for cleaning it up is smaller than 50%. Problem is the same holds true for a damage of $ 100,000 relative to your stock. Or any arbitrarily large amount. Your share in the damage caused could be in the billions, but worst thing the company goes bankrupt and you loose your stocks buying price.

        The only alternative would be holding shareholders responsible with their own money, if a company is forced to pay up for damages they caused, going past its bankruptcy.

        • smb@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          like i said:

          maybe the root-cause is […] the total lack of any consequences

          but you used much more words ;-)

          “publicly traded” does not imply that consequences would be impossible.

          i see the opposite is true.

          one could make that “public trade” also “very” public as in ownerships could only be changed together with a public note of who that new owner of that share is in person and only like not allow ownership changes more than twice a week per person, making investment more profitable than parasitic high performance trade. also the current lack of consequences could be improved by making the shareholders personally responsible for everything that the company does, including going to jail when the ceo left the country to not go there.

          that could include making those responsible who owned that company at the time of its crime, making trust in the company way more important than that they can cause damage to society in macroscope just to profit in microscopical bits.

          this way the shareholders would have a at least one trigger to actually want to look into who that bullshittalker is they want to let into such a position of “their property”

          society should take care who they let do things with “their property” too.

    • Allonzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      All the idiot Americans cheering about scapegoating single mothers as welfare queens, since the 80s, never an utterance by anyone with power of all the DO NOTHING private investors that drop their chips from their last trip to the exploitation casino and demand all the profit for no labor whatsoever.

      “Fuck you, I’m an owner, pay me.”

      Prior to the Jack Welch Ronald Reagan betrayal, the model was correcly “customers first, employees second, investors third.”

      Everything falls apart when you give every spare penny to the people who A) dont DO anything to make the money they demand and B) demand the companies they own sabotage their missions and futures to goose net profit for the current quarter so they can profit and walk away, only to demand it of other companies.

        • KickMeElmo@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The problem is fixable in microcode -if- it hasn’t already caused damage to the CPU. Most CPUs are fucked.

          • floofloof@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It sounds like a workaround, not a fix. And it’s not clear that it stops the processor degradation, rather than just slowing it.

            • zurohki@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              There’s no such thing as stopping processor degradation, it’s just that it usually takes so long that nobody cares anymore.

            • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              And the “fix” (big foam helmet) is not even out yet. They don’t have the chips to replace them all right now and are still selling more. You can help yourself by setting the clock speed (no boost) yourself.

              Oh and after the foam helmet gets put on they will still sell these using the old higher specs.

    • 800XL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Right to the pockets of the least useful in the company - the executives.

      • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        And here’s where I say - what does an executive actually do? And someone will inevitably say something asinine about “risk” and “game changing decisions” and “meeting with investors.”

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’d rather they try and put a random janitor in the CEO seat for a year and see what happens.

          Couldn’t be any worse than the current shit stain.

        • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          what does an executive actually do?

          According to conservatives, they trickle all over the rest of us. Isn’t that nice of them?

          • 800XL@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m still waiting - mouth wide open, head and hands towards heaven (where it comes from), for the trickle of capitalism to run down my face and enter my mouth.

        • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          And here’s where I say - what does an executive actually do?

          I just see them as a figure head for the people really in charge. We are now focused on dumb ass CEO decisions or announcements instead of the board voting to ship jobs overseas or something else terrible.

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The risk bit is self-evidently bullshit. Executives are the last to suffer when things go wrong. They can tank the whole company through greed and incompetence, and still collect their salaries of millions plus even bigger bonuses, before walking into a similar position somewhere else. It’s the employees that shoulder the risk.

        • 800XL@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          If you watch these companies they all want to be tech giants when they have no reason to do so. They hire tech execs from the giants thinking they’ll make some great business hybrid withithe help of the tech execs,but you know what? Sometimes a brick is just a brick.

          Two things happen, the tech execs lead them on a wild goose chase since they have no idea how to function in a different industry and people get fired, or the CEO is scared and ignores the suggestions to follow the same thing every other company does and people get fired

        • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s always the boot lickers saying they. CEO used to be THE guy in charge. It used to be someone who knew the company and worked their way up. McDonnell Douglas/Boeing used to have engineers in charge. Same with GE. Then Jack Welch came along and destroyed that entire ideology.

          He was the one that opened the door to late stage capitalism, at least in the USA. It’s hilarious how these companies piece meal themselves off acting like they did something for short term gain. Meanwhile, the Japanese, Chinese, and European companies are happy to buy all this knowledge as they are still playing the long game rather than the MBA clown show.

      • lobut@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ll have you know they deserve that money for doing a job no one else wants! Talking to other executives! /s

        • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s…wait. That’s actually a decent point. Imagine being around the scummiest, fakest people in the world 24/7. I couldn’t deal with it.

          • BearGun@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            For a couple hundred million a year i think i could deal with it. For like, one year, and then retire.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I feel like they have the farm bet on Falcon Shores and (to a lesser extend) the Xe line now, and of course the foundry.

    It’d be great if the bad rumors and delays would stop… yeah…

      • H4mi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        A bug or whatever in their 13’th and 14’th gen CPU’s makes them slowly but permanently degrade and cause crashes. Intel have not been handling the issue as you would hope since the discovery. Denying, downplaying, refusing a recall, refusing extended warranties, the lot. Now the lawsuits are cooking.

      • Shaggy1050@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        IIRC they sold and shipped 2 generations of CPUs that were essentially defective and unrepairable.

      • M500@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        They sold fairy high end processors. They took like 3 months to fix the issue. Processors that were damaged will remain damaged. I think Intel will replace them though.

        • SoJB@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          This saga has moved fast so I don’t blame you, just an FYI Intel has issued a statement saying the microcode update “will” fix all affected CPUs (it won’t, because the damage is physical) and will not be issuing a recall.

          We are witnessing one of the more obvious end-game states of capitalism. Intel continues to state they don’t give a single shit about this issue, and will not do anything about it.

          The corporate nihilism will continue until the collapse. More and more companies will act like this because why does anything matter when we can profit more today?

      • deadbeef@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not sure a short summary will cut it.

        They had no competition for a long period and ended up with an accountant CEO that caused their R&D to stagnate massively. They had a ton of struggling and failing to deliver all in most areas, and they wombled about releasing CPU generations with ~4% performance uplifts, probably saving a few bucks in the process.

        AMD turned back up again with Ryzen and Epyc models that were pretty good and and an impressive pace of improvement ( like ~14% generational uplifts ) that caused them such a fright that they figured out they had to ditch the accountant.

        Pat Gelsinger was asked to step up as CEO and fix that mess. They axed some obvious defective folks in their structure and rushed about to release 12th generation products with decent gains by cranking the power levels of the CPUs to absurd levels, this was risky and it kind of looks like they are being bit with it now.

        Server CPU sales are way down because they are just plain uncompetitive. They have missed out on the chunk of money they could have got from the AI bubble because they never had a good GPU architecture they could leverage over to use. They have been shutting down unprofitable and troublesome divisions like the Optane storage and NUC divisions to try and save money, but they are in a bad way.

        The class actions mentioned elsewhere in the thread are probably coming because the rush to make incremental improvements to 13th generation and 14th generation CPU’s resulted in issues with power levels and other problems that seem to be causing those CPU’s to crash and sometimes fail altogether.

          • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            There’s probably a huge story behind why Intel replaced their fab chief just days after it was revealed that he okayed sending out oxidized chips.

          • Dempf@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah /u/deadbeef@lemmy.nz kind of understated the problem. They were seeing insane failure rates in data centers like 50%. At this point, any 13th or 14th gen CPU that has experienced any crash or instability should be considered faulty unless you know the cause of the crash is from something else. This isn’t just me saying this, mainstream outlets like Gamers Nexus are saying it.

            If you’re a consumer and have one of those CPUs a replacement is probably in your future. And I wonder if Intel even has stock to replace that many at once…

            I can’t think of anything like this ever happening on this scale before in computing history.

        • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          What is it with accountants being chosen as CEO? Like if you were a competent accountant, you should be CFO, and the CEO is someone who knows what the fuck the company sells and how it profits, which I can guarantee you has never been a competent accountant.

          • TheGoldenGod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s a little like the sociopath hospital boards, having more billing staff than doctors and nurses. Making a massive mistake for quick profit and leaving it for the next guy to cleanup lawsuits. A little like robocall centers, okay with fleecing the poor as long as they only have to pay roughly 20% in damages, close shop and create a new call center all over again and rinse and repeat.

          • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            It’s because the big investors only give a fuck about number go up. Accountants show number go up. All current large investors also seem to have a complete inability to look more than 1-2 quarters in advance, at most. So if number go down, instead must force change to make number go up, but again only 1-2 quarters to make it happen. If number stay down, abandon and go elsewhere.

            Institutional investors, the ones with billions in assets controlled, and the real power in this world, don’t give a shit if the company is actually successful, or about sustainability, or anything other than continuous profits at any expense. And that’s how they perceive the accountants.

            • deadbeef@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              This video is perfectly applicable, the rot that sets in in a large company when you have no competition to counteract it is exactly what has happened here.

    • _bcron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Only if you have conviction. Buying tech in the face of recession fears is one thing, but buying tech that supplies hardware to tech is another. It’ll probably sound like a whip cracking if the AI frenzy ever collapses hard

      • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        ARM and Qualcomm aren’t really involved with AI, and AI only makes up 15-20% of AMD’s revenue. Nvidia the one to watch out for, an entire 85% of their revenue is just AI and Mellanox. The Nvidia pump has been insane.

        • _bcron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The elephant in the room is the semiconductor ETF trade. People are actively trading ETFs more than actual tickers (SOXL is routinely one of the highest volume tickers day in and day out, and it’s been like this for a couple years now). Used to be that NVDA and AMD correlated with crypto because people would flip them on that basis, but not really the case anymore due to all that but I digress - if NVDA tanks, it’s really overweight in all these ETFs, ETFs tank, managers dump every holding in the ETF, and a bunch of non-AI semi stocks will wind up getting walloped about as hard

          • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s true, Nvidia’s fall will probably crash the whole market. SOXL tickers don’t trade in unison though, see how much Intel fell in the premarket without affecting other stocks. Of course, Intel is a tenth of the size of Nvidia.

            • _bcron@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yeah, the tail could definitely wag the dog. NVDA is now in the top 3 holdings of both SPY and QQQ, so if something like 2 Metas or 1 Microsoft started paring back and skipped on a product cycle, Nvidia’s forward metrics would suddenly be garbage, and between those couple companies, suddenly >15% of market is tanking and dragging entire sectors along for a wild ride

        • hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Nvidia’s AI gambit is at least diversified to different kinds of AI. Even if (or probably when) LLM AI taps out, Nvidia will likely also be behind the AI tech that takes its place.

  • tisktisk@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    As a 30-year-old trying to break out into a tech career, this is incredibly disheartening.
    Really difficult to not give up all hope with headlines like these. How to believe in potentials for opportunities with these barrages of bad news? Where is the hope–Any silver linings at all?

    • Eezyville@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Apply to non-tech companies. There ate many companies who aren’t in the tech sector that relies on in-house tech.

    • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Intel is a failing company and has been for years, it has nothing to do with the tech industry. They failed to invest in chip fabrication, and their designs are soundly beaten by AMD and Nvidia. Look at AMD and Nvidia, they’re making record profits and hiring.

      Also, the tech industry is a huge place, there are plenty of opportunities outside of the hardware niche that Intel operates in. I will admit though that the current interest rates and risk of recession does make it harder for junior programmers.

      • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        They are doubling down on that mistake it would seem. Article says most of their losses last month were from their foundry division. I realize I’m just a random person on the ground, but shit like this really has me shaking my head. For a company like Intel foundry is absolutely essential to their business. If they can’t build the chips, build them better, faster, smaller, they can’t compete. It’s like if Airbus said they are firing everybody in their airplane division to focus on important things. What the hell, the airplane is the important thing. Same thing with Intel.

        Seems like a great time to buy stock in AMD.

        • sudo42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yup. A better simile is Boeing. Quality don’t matter if cutting it makes number go up. Oops.

          • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Well it’s cannibalizing the company. You’re absolutely right about Boeing.

            HP was another example. Fire all the engineers and R&D types, rush whatever’s already in the pipeline into production. You get a couple of fantastic quarters because you have new products without the R&D costs. But then you run out of new products in the pipeline and everything goes to shit because you killed your golden goose.

            • sudo42@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I will always say, “Fuck Carly Fiorina” for ruining the finest company in the engineering world.

    • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      As the OP said, get a job outside of tech.

      The biggest research hospitals employ electronic engineers, software engineers, chemical engineers, physicists, statisticians, network engineers, sysdamins, etc.

      Insurance companies? Auto industry? Power companies, pharmaceuticals, local governments etc. The best part about being a STEM is that you have a place everywhere. You just gotta be willing to bend your expectations until you find something that fits you.

      • admin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        But how do I find those jobs? When I search in Indeed all I get are tech companies or MSP’s. I’m currently working as a sysadmin for a Mom & Pop company and are severely underpaid.

        • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          My dude, if you lived in the right city, could pass a drug screen, and are not a moron, could get you an interview for a job installing power grid equipment in a week. With overtime take home pay is usually around 80k first year, after that it depends on how much you want to work.

          We have blue collar guys making 250k+ a year. Granted they are away from their home most of the time, but most of them are younger dudes with no family.

        • khapyman@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Find something middle sized. I work in a bakery, around 200 employees. I do some industrial automation, in house IT support and I ended up writing ERP for the joint. I think I could get 20 to 30 percent more at a larger company but here I do what I want and not what I’m told to.

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You like tech? You like wiring up and programming state-of-the-art commercial automation, access control, and cctv systems? You like to move around as well and work with your hands and tools, all on the same job? Become an electronic security technician. Been doing it for 20 years, it’s great, and always hiring, almost never firing, unless you get caught smoking meth or something.

      Nothing wrong with a more blue-collar style job.

      • tisktisk@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        This sounds beyond ideal–I don’t know if you’re trolling, because I have to imagine this line of work is never in demand at all, but hoping for interviews soon, and I can’t thank you enough even if you’re joking

      • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Similar job is power grid installation. Those are in high demand, and you get yourself a passport and you can make even more setting up transformers in weird places in the world after a few years experience.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Is this really a backfire? My read is that they’re actually focusing on their core business (plus cutting down marketing). It sounds like the right move, but maybe I’m too optimistic?

    • Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Chips Act, Take 1: Hey Intel here’s 8 Billion dollars to make us more chips in the US. Intel: I gotta let 15,000 of you go, there’s just not enough money…

    • Entropywins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t think it backfired…I truly don’t believe the Chips act is a jobs act. It is to address manufacturing gaps in semiconductors within the US. The US government wants semiconductor manufacturers to update foundries and gave them money to do so. The jobs that have been added within the industry have been icing on the cake but not the original intent imho.

    • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I thought they would be more tacit about it. This is too obvious and too soon after taking taxpayers’ money. But they probably don’t care anyways. Who is going to stop them or hold them accountable?

    • Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The CHIPS plants just started being built a few months ago. This is bad for the employees and short-term investors, but long-term Intel will be fine and the plants will be a net positive to the country.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s a good thing we gave them BILLIONS of Taxpayer Dollars! Otherwise they would have Laid Off Employees! Anyways we don’t have enough money in the Budget to Feed Starving American Children!

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I wonder how many of the over 1000 VPs will get canned. You read that right. I worked there at the beginning of my career. I know a lot of people who are now VPs. Only one of them was actually any good. One guy couldn’t even manage his own staff meetings when he was a first line manager. Nice guy, not dumb or anything, but not brilliant, and a terrible organizer.

  • ApollosArrow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    What’s crazy to me is that they are laying off more employees than the total number of full time employees I’ve work at for most companies.

    They are laying off 12% of their work force.

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s what happens when companies are too fucking big, and intel was essentially a monopoly for a while.

      I have interned at AT&T while at University, laying off a 1000 people would be less than 1 % for them.

      • ApollosArrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        After seeing this article I went down a rabbit hole and IBM isn’t even in the top 10 US of most employees. Here’s some of the popular ones from the top 30.

        • Walmart - 2.3 Million
        • Amazon - 1.61 Million
        • DHL - 594,000
        • FedEx - 547,000
        • UPS - 536,000
        • Home Depot - 456,000
        • Target - 415,000
        • Kroger - 414,000
        • Marriott - 411,000
        • Starbucks - 381,000
        • Walgreens - 333,000
        • Pepsi - 318,000
        • Costco - 316,000
        • Chase - 309,000
        • Lowes - 300,000
        • IBM - 282,000
        • CVS - 219,000
        • Bank of America - 212,000

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_United_States–based_employers_globally

        • ...m...@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          …i’m surprised to see DHL rank so highly in that list: what’s their domestic market focus, business-to-business freight logistics?..i seldom see DHL packages and when i do they’re almost exclusively of international origin…

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s a dude in wallstreetbets who dumped a $700k inheritance into Intel stocks. lol

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I had a friend in the '90s who took a $40K inheritance and “invested” it all on $75 Fossil watches, the kind with Popeye and other cartoon characters on them. At least she was able to show them off at parties and get all the guests to go home.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, Intel is down 33% over the last two days… didn’t work this time…

        Some layoffs can be seen as “improving efficiency”. This deep of cut is “oh shit, things are screwed”.

        • jacksilver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It has me oddly hopeful. It sounds like they may have finally realized that they can’t ignore their core product/purpose. However, whether it’s too late or if they have the ability to actually execute is still to be seen.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Frankly, no idea. They talked the talk, but it’s vague enough that I wouldn’t be surprised if they cut out some important people and kept a lot of the bogus crap.

            Speaking from a company that has seen (less dramatic) rhetoric around similar circumstances, and everyone on the ground who understood nuance would have guessed certain projects to get canned. Then it turns out they treated the money losing projects as the sacred cows and cut the profitable projects to the bone and put them at risk rather than give up the losers.

      • slaacaa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Holy F, what an idiot nepo baby. Maybe daddy who pays for college works as a VP at intel

      • kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Meh, he bought a significant dip, even if it goes lower in the coming months, in a few years he will be way up. It’s not like Intel will go away, they are in a duopoly market.

        Intel has been down from around 50 YTD to 30 likely in a few years it will be back to 50 and he will close to double his money

        Though he could have probably just put the 700K into S&P 500 and have his retirement taken care of, since he is in his 20s

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        My experiences working for huge corporations have made it clear what an enormous percentage of corporate workers spend all their time on useless busy work, so in theory layoffs can make a corporation more profitable. The problem is that it’s rarely the useless ass-kissers who get laid off.

        • tempest@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          If the bureaucracy could easily identify the dead weight projects it wouldn’t need the layoffs but that also means it can’t make good choices when doing layoffs.

          It’s like chemotherapy.

        • pufferfisherpowder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I just started a corporate job a while ago and they still can’t really tell me what I’ll be doing. My onboarding plan suggests that in month 2-3 I’ll be ready to get into it. Like, dude, wtf?

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, my team has gotten cut and the end result is one management type person per person actually doing anything… They are “managing” teams of one each, effectively…

    • tmcgh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Dude, what the heck is wrong with people. Wealth is wasted on the stupid.

        • tmcgh@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The problem is that it is just poor money management. He could’ve been set for life. Put that into an index or S&P500 and get 10% every year. That’s 70k and he wouldn’t even have to work. If you took that 70k and invested back into the fund, you can double your money in about 7 years, assuming 10% returns.

          • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah I agree. That’s what I would’ve done. You saying that wealth is wasted just made it sound like the money dissapeared somehow. He wasted his chance on financial independence, sure, but that’s not away from the rest of us.

      • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        its mainly that our modern culture worships money and things whoever has more of it is inherently better.

        So rich people make bad decisions because they think that being rich means they are always right, and that their ideas are special and magical and come from a mystical realm of refined thought only people with stacks of cash possess.

        And when they fail, they blame everything except their greed focused short sightedness.

  • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    So the semiconductor jobs and manufacturing isn’t coming back to the US?

    Who else saw this coming? Because I did.

    I remember telling people that and they wouldn’t believe it. Time has a way of making the unknown known.