I choose to believe chestnuts are lazy.

  • weeeeum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    A double negative should never remain negative.

    I hate hearing “didn’t do nothing”, as in, they did not do anything. I hate it because it’s inconsistent.

    “Didn’t do nothing” would typically be interpreted as “did not do something”. However “I did not, in fact, do nothing” might be interpreted as doing something.

    Now you have grey zones and misunderstandings where you have no idea what they are talking about because they keep stacking negatives, with different meanings in different contexts.

    • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Historically, double-negatives were considered proper or required in some dialects of English (or what would become English depending upon where one might draw that line). Many other languages require some form of negative agreement in negative sentences.

  • Delphia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Socks and slides is only acceptable footwear for taking the bin to the kerb or checking the mailbox. If you’re wearing them in public I immediately assume you are a classless dumbass and your opinion on anything is irrelevant.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I get annoyed at people who wait at pedestrian crossings but never push the button.

    Are they waiting for someone else to push it because it’s beneath them? Do they think it has cooties? Do they secretly not want to reach their destination? Do they think the buttons are fake, and traffic engineers are waiting to laugh at them on hidden cameras?

    • pathief@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I am sometimes guilty of this. I incorrectly assume the lights are looping and I just have to wait my turn.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      All too often the buttons are just placebos to keep you waiting until the walk sign comes on anyway

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      My current place is within one of those new ‘15 minute’ areas. So I walk everywhere I can.

      The new pushbuttons let you wave your hand in front of them to trigger them.

  • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    If you insist on pronouncing “gif” as “gif” instead of “jif”, you should pronounce “jpeg” as “jfeg”.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The way most people in my region pronounce the words “jewelry” and “realtor” really annoys me. I’m in the tiny minority who pronounces them the way I do, so I never say anything. But the locals almost all add a “LUH” to the middle. It’s an extra syllable that just isn’t in the spelling.

    They say jew-LUH-ree and ree-LUH-ter. I pronounce these jewel-ree and reel-ter. I’m absolutely delighted when I hear someone say them the “correct” way, like I do.

    Similar thing for how most around here say the year. When people say “two thousand and twenty-four” it grinds my gears. Just say “twenty twenty-four”, FFS.

  • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I always hated how most people don’t pronounce the first R in “February”. It just sounded kinda weird to me.

    • NaoPb@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Now you have me paying attention to how I pronounce it. And now either way feels weird. Thanks a lot.

    • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I propose we replace the word entirely to something easier to spell and pronounce, such as “Feby”.

      • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you’re going to fix the calendar, we should move SEPTember to position 7, OCTober to 8, NOvember to 9, and DECember to 10 where they belong (or just rename them all to be number-based instead of an arbitrary mish-mash of numbers, people (Julius, Augustus, etc.), and so on).

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    A power supply, the thing that gets plugged into AC mains power and outputs some sort of DC (usually USB now) to power electronics is not a “charger”. It (usually) doesn’t know anything about charging batteries, and connecting its output directly to a Li-ion battery would lead to an explosion. The charger is integrated into the device receiving that power.

    “Portable battery” is a terrible term to describe a USB powerbank. Thousands of battery types are portable, but don’t have USB ports or output exactly the right voltage. Some powerbanks are sold without batteries.

    • kibiz0r@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      My kid calls USB cables “chargers”. My sister witnessed this for the first time, turned to me (known techie and pedant) and was like “You’re okay with this?”

  • thomasloven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Difference in temperature cannot be expressed in °C. It’s not 5 °C warmer today than yesterday. It’s 5 K warmer. You can say “five degrees warmer”, but not “five degrees Celsius warmer” or “five Celsius warmer”. “Five Celsius degrees warmer” is also correct, but who’d do that?

    The reason is that the Celsius scale has a fixed offset. If your birthday is in a week, you wouldn’t say it’s “one seventh of January from today”.

      • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The same applies to Fahrenheit, differences between temperatures in Fahrenheit should be expressed using the Rankine scale.

    • boyi@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The reason is that the Celsius scale has a fixed offset.

      Can you explain more on this? I still don’t get it.

      As of now, although I am not a man of authority on this subject, I still think temperature difference can be expressed by using celcius simply because the celcius has the same equivalent difference as Kelvin. The difference of the two value of the same unit will still be the same unit.

      First, from here

      Since the standardization of the kelvin in the International System of Units, it has subsequently been redefined in terms of the equivalent fixing points on the Kelvin scale, so that a temperature increment of one degree Celsius is the same as an increment of one kelvin, though numerically the scales differ by an exact offset of 273.15.

      Secondly from here

      The degree Celsius (symbol: °C) can refer to a specific point on the Celsius temperature scale or to a difference or range between two temperatures.

    • myliltoehurts@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I was not aware of this before and this is probably one of the most pedantic things I’ve heard for a while - great answer.

  • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    More like pet peeves, and not something I’d lose my sleep over, but they’re hilariously pedantic. I’ll focus on Latin because I’d rather not pick on existing linguistic communities.

    ⟨V⟩ and ⟨U⟩ are not different letters in Latin. Deal with it. The “right” way to use them is like this:

    • Upper case - ⟨V⟩, always
    • Lower case - ⟨u⟩ or ⟨v⟩, pick one, but don’t mix them

    People fāiling to follow the əbove ɑre æs ənnoying æs someone insistently respelling English ⟨A⟩ with rændom junk bāsed on the sound. Like I æm doing now.

    Same deal with ⟨I⟩ vs. ⟨J⟩. J’m not gojng to stop you from dojng so, but you can almost hear my “tsk, tsk, tsk” from a djstance.

    There’s one way to pronounce Latin ⟨C⟩. It’s /k/ (as in “skill”). If you use /tʃ/ (as in “chimp”), /ʃ/ (as in “shampoo”), /ts/ (as in “cats”), /s/ (as in “silly”), you’re doing it wrong. Unless you’re handling Late Latin, but then follow some consistent set of rules dammit, not just “I use Latin like the Church does”.

    “Veni, uidi, uici” is supposed to be pronounced ['we:ni: 'wi:di: wi:ki:]; or roughly “WAY-nee WEE-dee WEE-kee”. Once you pronounce it with random stuff like “vany VD vaitchy”, you’re wrecking all its alliterative appeal.

    Speaking on that, Brutus is an unsung hero for going all stab-stabby against the guy who said the above. A shame that nobody did it against his adoptive child.

  • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    A whole lot of grammatical and/or punctuation-related things.

    A particular bugbear is people using “disinterested” when the word they mean and should (IMO) use is “uninterested”.

    I appreciate that “disinterested” has come to mean “uninterested” but since it has another, already established meaning, I wish people would use them correctly.

    For what it’s worth:

    • Uninterested - “that has no interest for me, I do not have interest in it.”
    • Disinterested - “that may or may not have interest for me, but either way, I do not have an interest in it.”
  • herrvogel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Germany did not invent döner kebap and it’s insane that they claim that. Anyone who insists on it displays a tragic lack of understanding about what a kebab even is and should be ashamed of themselves.

    What they did invent is their own way of preparing and serving döner kebab, an existing dish that is itself a variation of other existing dishes that came before it. In the kebab world, that’s not only allowed but also basically encouraged. Everyone is welcome to modify dishes to their heart’s desire. There are countless kebab dishes in Turkish cuisine that are nothing more than slight variations on existing dishes. What you should do after creating your own variant, however, is to also give it your own name to mark the difference. That’s what the Germans have not done. They’re continuing to use the name of a dish they did not invent. That’s a bit of a dick move. Seriously, look up Adana kebab and Urfa kebab. They’re essentially the exact same thing except one is hot and the other is not. Yet they have different names, because that’s how it’s done.

    The German döner kebab is a distinctly different thing than the “real” döner kebab. According to the long standing kebab traditions, it must be given its own name. Otherwise no, döner kebab was most certainly not invented in Germany. Name it something else and make a proper claim. It would even help enrich your exceptionally poor and boring cuisine a little bit.

    • sunzu@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      By Germans you mean ethnic Turks who made it and marketed it as such to ethnic germans?

      I mean I get your point but the naming here is part of marketing IMHO German Turks made it for local market while keep “exotic” name

      Rebranding at this stage is futile lol this thing is more popular prolly than the Turkish original lol

      • herrvogel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It is true that it was a Turk that marketed it as such, but it’s mostly the Germans that are so insistent on claiming it’s a German invention. The only Turks I’ve seen that weren’t largely indifferent were those who made and sold the stuff, but even the non-döner-worker Germans can be weirdly militant about it especially after a few drinks.

        In any case, why it was named that is irrelevant to the point. Which is that we’re being pedantic in this thread and, strictly speaking, the name is wrong. It is in gross violation of the unwritten döner naming conventions. But obviously I’m not holding my breath for any official rebranding.