![](/static/be9a2c79/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
What do you do with CDs? Genuinely curious about how they can be used in 2024 and surprised artists still have any printed.
What do you do with CDs? Genuinely curious about how they can be used in 2024 and surprised artists still have any printed.
The brakes broke, so I guess technically it could be a “break failure.”
Yes, users have begun to be alerted of trackers—this is the recent change by Google as it relates to this post. An ongoing issue is, to my knowledge, that there’s no way to identify what kind of device it is. Goggle’s instructions literally suggest taking a screenshot of the serial number for later reference.
Android has no way of knowing if a tag is “unauthorized” because Apple does not provision access to their tag network. You could, in principle, ignore tags that you know about, but you’d have to do it by identifying it by some arbitrary hexadecimal GATT ID.
As always, Apple wants to keep it that way, because it gives a poor experience on Android.
Theoretically (and I might be wrong about this), without attempting to reverse engineer how Apple assigns these codes, there would be no to differentiate AirTags, AirPods, iPhones, etc.
We’re up in arms about the discontinuation of a 12-year-old security camera? I think 12 years of support is more than reasonable.
There is a much more sinister issue that Google is trying to resolve with this: it’s currently possible to stalk somebody by placing a tracker fob in their bag or on their car, so long as you know the victim’s device doesn’t support it.
Suppose some creeper with an iPhone is stalking a victim with an Android phone. So long as they use an Apple AirTag, the victim will never know they have a tracker trailing them wherever they go. And in reverse, the issue is the same.
Apple isn’t concerned about this, because they hold a monopoly in the market they care most about and can leverage this as an iPhone-only feature. After all, so long as you have an iPhone, you’ll be warned about an AirTag you don’t own following you. Apple wants to leverage this as an exclusive safety feature and have no intention of allowing other devices to do the same.
Apologies for providing this background as I know that this goes against the circle jerk of accusing Google of infringing our privacy. Feel free to disregard this context of it being beneficial to our collective privacy.
Precisely; for context, it was recently discussed in Dutch media how some of these e-bikes reach 60 km/h. Together with a culture of people refusing to wear bicycle helmets, there’s certainly some more nuance and middle ground.
There needs to be some kind of solution, but doing nothing is not really an option.
How do you navigate?
3,000 people clicked a button out of curiosity or by mistake. If this is statistically relevant for their install base, there really is nobody using Brave. I have as many users randomly come and go into my game on a daily basis.
Aren’t most keyless cars also keyed? It seems to me that extending the signal of a wireless fob is just easier and quicker.
In the same boat. I’m contemplating just cutting my losses at this point.
There was quite a different reaction to the iPhone when it launched, so I’m pretty confident it’s not the latter.
Precisely. I abhor the phrase, but it’s demonstrably a case of herd mentality.
Wait, do I downvote myself now?
/s, in case that wasn’t abundantly clear
You replied to me, so you’re disagreeing with me, right? Downvoted.
Ironically, I’ve been downvoted for saying this in response to somebody sympathizing with my previous downvoted comment that was expanding in support of somebody’s highly upvoted comment with some background.
I think the general sentiment on Lemmy is that any comment reply must surely be in disagreement and receives an automatic downvote. Mostly I visit the comments for discourse and upvote interesting threads of conversation.
In my opinion, really there should be no downvote button.
I’ve learned from this community that piracy isn’t theft, yet Nintendo’s attorney said to the court, “It’s for that reason that we do all we can to prevent games on Nintendo systems from being stolen.”
Why is the attorney allowed to lie to the court? Shouldn’t he be disbarred and prosecuted himself?
Apple doesn’t care about your privacy. They care about their image of caring about your privacy.