• AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Brave is garbage. It’s a cryptoscam adscam browser based on Chrome. For the love of god, use Firefox (or Vivaldi if you absolutely need chromium)

    • Clandestine@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I can’t say I disagree, I’ve long abandoned it on my PC.

      But Brave has superb AdBlocking capabilities compared to every other browser for iPhone, so I’m still using it on my phone.

      • Samueru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        But Brave has superb AdBlocking capabilities compared to every other browser for iPhone

        It is the same on android, it even lets me watch youtube vids without ads and in the background.

    • elwy@fedit.io
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      At least on android Firefox has Google tracking built into the app among much other tracking/ads. If you don’t like Brave you may want to consider a Firefox fork. On IOS Brave is the only big browser with competent adblock afaik until/unless Firefox gets extensions going.

      Edit: I forgot criticizing Firefox is wrongthink on the fediverse and will get you donwnvoted no matter what. Even if it’s in the context of advising people to switch FROM Brave TO a Firefox fork on Android.

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m not sure if fennec has it, it’s the core Firefox android build that is not published to the store.

      • Syrc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        On IOS Brave is the only big browser with competent adblock afaik until/unless Firefox gets extensions going.

        Safari + AdGuard gave me no issues so far.

    • 13@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      @AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml @FatCat@lemmy.world Brave may have its flaws but at least it has an offline Dino game, what does Firefox have?

    • Samueru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Brave is great, has configurable keybinds, nice default adblock block list, vertical tabs, syncing sessions without email, etc.

      And on android it can play youtube vids on the background.

      The crypto ads just get disabled on the new tab page, you don’t even have to go to the settings lol. And vivaldi is partially closed source btw.

        • Samueru@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Brave is an interesting case, they found a way to make money that doesn’t involve tracking their users, making deals with google or be closed source lol

          If you hate that fine, I definitely prefer that than the other alternatives lol.

  • poopkins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    3,000 people clicked a button out of curiosity or by mistake. If this is statistically relevant for their install base, there really is nobody using Brave. I have as many users randomly come and go into my game on a daily basis.

  • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    For god sakes don’t use Brave. Brave has been caught doing shady shit in the past, and the CEO is a piece of shit on top of that.

    Use Firefox with privacy addons.

          • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Mozilla was doing poorly when he was CEO as well. Google has been doing everything they can to force Chrome.

            He was CEO for 11 days and in that time all he did was cause a bunch of websites to show a banner requesting that users install a different browser in order to not support a homophobe.

            There was also a boatload of articles about his homophobia that brought Mozilla into disrepute.

            • turkishdelight@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              The problem is appointing Mozilla leadership based on ideological purity rather than technical merit.

              • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Firstly, who says that’s happening?

                And secondly, this isn’t entirely about purity - even if you personally (and I’m not saying this is your view, btw) don’t give the slightest fuck about gay people and you’re fine with them having fewer rights/fine with others actively trying to strip their rights away - others aren’t, and it’s harmful to the business.

                Eich was CEO for 11 days and achieved nothing other than a Firefox boycott, dozens of negative Firefox headlines, and Firefox being known as the homophobic browser.

                Even from a cold-hearted “fuck human rights, I care only about market share” POV, Rich was still an awful CEO decision.

          • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Would you hire a bigot to run your company so long as the numbers go up? Fuck that mentality.

    • cryptix@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      But in iOS , addons (ublock origin) are not available at least outside EU, so brave is the better choice as it got brave shield . everywhere else I use Firefox.

      • hannes3120@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Vivaldi is the best!

        Currently trying out Floorp as a Firefox fork for the possibility that Google’s disabling of adblockers in the manifest will make it impossible to use chromium browsers which is kind of good, too

        But Vivaldi rules as long as chromium is an option!

        • Madis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Floorp looks nice and customizable, but in terms of updates it doesn’t seem very sustainable yet.

          • hannes3120@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            I get updates every other week

            but I think it’s in a weird spot with not having regular English patchnotes - and afaik they also use an older rendering-engine

    • markon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      There is one issues though… Firefox is extremely slow and clunky. I hate to say it, but on mobile it is hard to use all the time for me. On desktop I’m Firefox 95% of the time but some sites don’t work very well with the much slower JavaScript engine. This isn’t to defend Brave or any chromium browser but we gotta get Firefox up to speed.

      • the16bitgamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is on iOS. There is no Firefox (geko) or Chromium, there is only skins of Safari so your point is moot. For now.

      • dai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Firefox is fine on mobile in my eyes.

        At least the Android version, even on my 5 year old Exynos phone it does what I need / want from a browser. Allows (some) extensions, lets me zoom wherever I want to on any page, has a reader mode and is snappy enough on old hardware.

        Chrome tries to be / do far too much for me, just fuck off and let me browse the web. I do like the dynamic colours that Chrome on mobile uses on different webpages, is hot.

        However Chrome gives me dirty Microsoft vibes, and it’s pretty hard to shake that stank.

        If your on iOS welcome to the walled garden. Hope you live in the EU.

      • RedSeries@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I feel like Firefox has made some really great strides on the performance front. Especially considering how bloated chrome has gotten as a comparison. But… Yeah that’s valid. I love Firefox like 99% of the time but sometimes I’m almost forced to swap to Chrome to get a site to work correctly or reliably.

      • rambaroo@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Firefox and chromium both outperform Safari in performance tests, or roughly the same depending on the setup.

        It’s Safari that’s the third rate browser. No one would use that shit if it hadn’t been forced on them and if the other vendors weren’t restricted by Apple.

        There’s a reason Apple stopped making Safari for other platforms. It never caught on, 'cause it sucks. Safari can’t compete without Apple kneecapping the competition. They’re like a sports team that can’t win without playing on their home turf at 10000 ft altitude where they pump in crowd noise and drug the other team’s gatorade

      • locuester@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Nah. I hear your complaint but look up any stock ticker. Starting at 0 would simply cause too much white space and make it hard to see movements.

        The y-axis is clearly labeled allowing us to see that it’s about a 40% jump.

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not really, no. You use a point of reference that’s clearly labeled. If you’d start the graph at zero, you would just end up with a lot of dead space.

      • Pantherina@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        No the axis shows a detailed increase with clearly stated numbers. This is just the first impression.

        We are not talking about Apple graph madness

        apple bullshit

  • redditReallySucks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The axis is somewhat misleading. A jump from 8k to 11k installs is nothing.

    Edit: just saw from the comments this is the number of installs per day so its bigger than I thought

    • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      A jump from 8k to 11k installs is nothing.

      It’s about a third. Imagine if your income went up by 30% in 24 hours, I reckon you’d be pretty happy about that.

      Also - it tends to take months for a new version of iOS to reach a large number of users, and years to reach everyone. So a rapid growth rate (probably not 30%, but still fast) is likely to be sustained over quite a while.

      • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, I’m sure a lot of people are trying it out. I’m curious what the other options look like and how many continue using them after the initial install.

  • turkishdelight@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t use Brave due to lack of uBlock Origin support. Otherwise it seems like a decent browser.

    • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Thing is, on iOS, at least in the past, Firefox had no uBlock origin support, which pushed Brave’s adblocking capability to the #1 spot.

  • Account_93@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    There is zero reason to switch browsers on iOS, They all run the same engine. Safari also has extensions (which I believe 3rd party browsers can’t use).

    • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Again, this is why this law was such a big deal. Prior to this you were correct. Thanks to the DMA, you are wrong. Firefox will be running Gecko, and Vivaldi, Brave, Chrome, etc are allowed to ship their flavors of chromium.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Eh, that’s not true. Yes they run on the same engine, but there can still be different features overlaid on top, plus syncing history/bookmarks with your other devices.

      The engine is by far the biggest part of a browser, but it is not the only part of a browser.

      Also, EU users will soon have access to “real” different browsers.

  • foremanguy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t think this is a good thing, brave is good out of the box but do not provide good browsing experience

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m so glad they included a key otherwise I wouldn’t know what the green line represented.