po-lina-ergi

Assuming the wording of a law exists to protect you was your first mistake

Young democrats are probably the ones least likely to fall in line.

Honestly at this point anybody who needs Trump not to win should be organising their life as if he already has and will come into office next January.

You’d think a guy with a lifetime in politics would understand optics better than this.

No pigs were harmed in the making of these scams

The conversation goes

• Taxation is theft because it’s involuntary
• Having to have a job is also involuntary
• No you can choose not to have a job you’ll just be homeless
• You can choose not to pay taxes you’ll just go to prison, because “just don’t have income or property” is as impractical as “just live your life from prison”

I merely disagreed with your proposal in detail and asked you to defend it if you were so convinced of it.

So you’re just strawmanning me? Because at no point have I made a “proposal”.

What position do you want me to defend? So far my position has been that the US should be doing more to apply pressure to Israel.

How do you disagree with that WITHOUT taking the stance that any other action would lead to a worse outcome?

Pointing out that cutting our nose to spite our face is a bad policy

Again, what is this hypothetical cutting of the nose?

If you say that doing anything more than what the US is currently doing will “do worse than fuck all”, how is that not an endorsement of that policy? You’re saying it’s the best option.

My guy you’re literally saying there’s no solution that isn’t worse than doing what the current administration is doing, which is more or less nothing.

That’s not a straw man. That’s just restating your argument at you.

You’re right there’s absolutely no solution remotely possible, and that justifies the complete lack of even trying anything spicier than “Bibi pls”

I don’t care about the weapons. Israel obviously doesn’t need more weapons to finish their genocide.

It’s just pretty obvious that you don’t make a real effort to prevent a state completing it’s genocide before you stop supplying them with arms.

You think they’ve actually tried? Given that they’re still supplying weapons to them?

Propaganda bots on a site with like 12 active users is more likely to you than people not wanting to vote in support of genocide?

You won’t have more issues with it than you’ll already have using Windows.

You absolutely will, and the ones you get will be harder to solve. It’s far more useable than it used to be, but the overall experience with Windows is still easier.

BUT it probably is quite usable for you overall. Just don’t go into it expecting nothing but smooth sailing.

A conventional Russian armed forces, yeah, in all likelihood. Vietnam wasn’t that, and where it was, the North did badly by comparison.

The hypothetical is normally involving a conventional, symmetric war in Europe.

70 years is not enough to fully industrialize a society

Russia, China

Also, I imagine industry in general becomes significantly easier when you have people that can summon construction projects out of the ground or weld with their bare hands.

Also, society isn’t industrialised. One city state within society is industrialised.

Also, the fire nation was already undergoing industrialisation at the time of ATLA.

Did you just link to a source that said both sides broke it and act like it said only one broke it?

Private Vs public has nothing to do with security

If people can execute arbitrary code in your app, they can already read your memory, and even if they couldn’t they could use java reflection to just turn off the private modifier

Accessibility modifiers are to do with maintainability. If you have internal implementation logic that should be hidden from a consumer you don’t want that consumer to have to know about things they shouldn’t be changing anyway.

The comic is just about how classnames in java should be in pascal case