Is she viable with our current first-past-the-post system
viability is a myth invented by the media. hilary was viable. john kerry.
Is she viable with our current first-past-the-post system
viability is a myth invented by the media. hilary was viable. john kerry.
no, she’s going to be on the ballot whether we have ranked choice or no.
Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
jill stein is not in the gop. calling another user names is your prerogative, but it has nothing to do with me, and it doesn’t have any bearing on whether we should break with “tradition”. this is basically a string of bad faith an non sequitur attacks in the guise of a comment.
i don’t think that’s true, i think democrats don’t care about the people who are harmed when democrats are in power.
your falling for (or perpetrating) an informal fallacy called “equivocation”. voting is not harm reduction.
harm reduction is recognizing the bad thing is going to happen, and helping people mitigate the consequences. it has a specific meaning, and voting is not harm reduction.
oh, i don’t have republican traditions.
it’s not 44 years: it’s two. 1996 and 2012 were the only years a sitting Democrat ran for president.
voting is not harm reduction
can you give a source for these lines?
the analysis shows perot damaged Clinton’s margin of victory.
demanding peace is not supporting russia. that video, also, does not support the quote that you bandied about earlier. can you source your claim?
The president enjoys no authority to assassinate anyone
obama thanks you for not remembering that time he assassinated a 16 year old american citizen.
voting is not harm reduction
you’re either aware of the problem and want to encourage people to vote third party while pretending not to know how the system works or you’re actually just ignorant to the issu
false dichotomy
FPTP voting systems result in a 2 party system and simply voting for another party does not solve the issue.
this isn’t an immutable natural law.
this, also, is not a source for that quote. your characterization that she supports russia is also not supported by what you just linked.
the only place i can find your quote is in a far right think tank called “third way” and the link they provide does not have the full quote they claim she gave. can you provide a source with the full quote?
the ambiguity of this syntax is fun! the democrats are handing the election to trump, and jill stein is trying to pull votes from them!