I don’t usually post political stuff, but I don’t see ANYONE talking about this, and I really believe if we don’t do this, we will hand the U.S. over to fascists.

Your vote matters. Most of you reading this know it. But the truth is that the left is HORRIBLE at getting out to vote. From what I’ve read, registered democrats outnumber repubs by 10-15%. Yet on average less then 70% vote. There exists an apathy towards voting in a portion of the left that assumes that they don’t need to vote because “who would vote for that idiot Trump?”. They assume it’s a done deal, and don’t bother.

THOSE are the people we need to target. We need to set up community activists whose only purpose is to make sure democrats either fill out a mail in ballot, or have a ride to the voting booths. Every democrat needs to take a friend or two with them. We need to make voting a communal act where we encourage, check up on, and practically insist on their vote.

I believe that if we DON’T do this, it WILL BE the END of democracy. We have the numbers. Now we just need to get them out to vote.

  • Copernican@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I wish we had Australian style compulsory voting. Members of a democracy should know the will of the majority and citizens should have a duty to participate.

  • marine_mustang@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Voting once every four years isn’t enough. Voting twice per year every other year (primaries/caucuses and general elections, midterms and Presidential) should be the bare minimum. In addition, if you have the time, get involved locally. Email your state and federal repa, let them know what you care about. Talk to your city councils and county boards.

  • wavebeam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I leaned way in for the 2016 and 2020 elections. I literally ran for city council (and lost) in 2020 to be part of the efforts to push things in big and small ways in the right direction. It was exhausting. People were awful and it was overall a terrible experience.

    Meanwhile, for years, my wife and I were in the long and frequently disappointing process of adopting children from our local foster care system; we decided that adopting kids who needed families was better than bringing any more children into this hellscape.

    3 weeks after I lost the miserable race for city council to a lawyer who had lost (sorry, settled) a sexual harassment lawsuit from his secretary only a couple years earlier, we took in our now-adopted kids. In the last 4 years we’ve had non-stop challenges, especially with my daughter, with behaviors - she was recently diagnosed with RAD. And we’ve chosen to pull back on basically anything that isn’t either helping us get some sense of stability, is at least enjoyable, or unavoidable.

    I agree that everyone who can should be doing anything they can above and beyond voting. But I feel like all I can muster with activism right now is voting, and caring for my kids the best I can.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    The non-profit I work for is pretty awesome, so I get election days off. Usually I vote first thing in the morning and then get hammered drunk (about the only times of the year I day-drink).

    While traditions are fine and dandy, if you’re in my neck of the woods and need a ride to/from your polling place, I will stay sober and pick you up. No questions asked. If there’s time and you wanna stop at the grocery store on the way home, I’ll carry your groceries in for you. Whatever gets you out to the polls.

      • Dragomus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        I have hope democracy prevails… But also a big feeling that the republicans have all their pawns lined up for a perfect storm this time (and half of them are still hidden), allowing them to be able to semi legally brush the election results aside. They had 6+ years to prepare…

        Only a true landslide of blue votes might be able to give some of them pause, a small difference would be ignored and decided upon faster than Gore vs Bush.

        Trump will declare a win regardless of the outcome.

        • OpenStars@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Right, we had a plutocracy, but even the fiction of the fraction of democracy that we used to have was fairly good - e.g. it took 400+ years but black people are now perhaps 4/5ths rather than a mere 3/5ths of a person. Man, politics is depressing:-(.

          Still, I suspect we will look back and wish that we had kept it, as opposed to the alternative we are heading for.

      • Breezy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        I wish my vote would matter, but i live in the south, Tennessee, and i never vote because i dont feel like it would mean anything. I wish i were wrong.

        • halferect@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          It does mean something, if every single one of you that thinks your votes don’t matter actually votes the south would change. I bet in your area some elections are won and lost by less then 1000 votes

  • Zerlyna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    On my end I have friends that “don’t keep up with politics”. We have a few months to educate them what is happening around them.

    • MrFunkEdude@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I honestly don’t think “education” is the key. It’s been well established that people don’t make decisions according to “the facts” as much as we do our emotions. You can’t “convince” someone that they are wrong unless you give them an emotional carrot to lead them.

      Give them the facts, but give them an emotional grounding to those facts. “This is your chance to make a fascists day shit.” might work better then “You need to vote because of X,Y,Z.”

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    That should be just one of the things Biden needs to unilaterally decide to do with his newfound ultramegapowers: everyone gets election day off and paid. Presidential mandate, so it’s super legal and cool 😎

    Republicans wouldn’t stand a fucking chance.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I can’t believe how often I’m seeing this misunderstanding: Biden doesn’t have full authority to change the system of laws or function of the federal government.

      The SCOTUS decision simply gives him the power to commit crimes in official capacity without repercussions.

      • mostNONheinous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        So if he doesn’t have the power to do those things, but does them anyway……that would be a crime, correct?

        • candybrie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          No. It just doesn’t carry the power of law. There’s never been potential criminal liability for him writing executive orders beyond his powers. They simply get struck down.

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        No, this is wrong. They left the door open to almost literally ANY egregious interpretation of what an “official act” is. Voting seems like something a sitting President should be making more accessible to all. Pretty official to me, but who is to say I guess?

        Biden is fully free to let shit off the chain fly and force them to reign it in. Nobody can stop him in time for the election, so I really hope he fucking uses it.

          • just_another_person@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            It apparently DOES, because they didn’t define what “official acts” are. I could say scratching myself is an official act, or showing my tits is, or selling Presidential records or artifacts is when I keep the money. They left it completely open betting on the fact that Trump was going to win. Read the ruling, it’s open to insane interpretation for absolutely anything as long as you say “OFFICIAL ACT GOING ON HERE”.

            Same dumb shit these same assholes allowed for “stand your ground” states. If I think something is whatever I say it is, I’m free to do whatever the fuck I want about it, including killing people.

            • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              JFC you don’t understand.

              Imagine this hypothetical: If I recruit you into the police force, give you a badge and a gun, and send you out without bullets: you still can’t shoot people. You’re legally allowed to shoot people in specific contexts, but you physically cannot because you have no ammo. In order for Biden to “Get Ammo” he would need someone to give it to him, e.g. the Senate. He has plenty of stuff to use, like a stun gun or a baton.

              Biden cannot change how the government functions, the laws as they apply to everyone, or how the federal budget is allocated or capped. He can have people beaten to death in their home as an official act, but he can’t rewrite the constitution.

    • Zibobwa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      This is one of the best responses I’ve heard to the question of how can Biden use these new powers for to win while still taking the high road. Thanks for this idea!

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Unless swing states are just chock full of lefties, what’s the point?

      Hillary won the popular vote in '16 by several million, but we got Trump because of the electoral college and a swing state going for him.

      Those are the people candidates are focusing on appealing to because they’re the ones that decide the election (and are a weak point in our democracy). And stamping ones feet and demanding to be catered to (or else they won’t vote), is selfish and short sighted when so much is at stake.

      Until we get rid of or work around the electoral college, that’s basically the way it’s going to be (assuming we still have elections after 2024).

    • MrFunkEdude@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      What I was looking at was the percentage of registered democrats that vote. But even if I am wrong, and your numbers are right, it would seem to me to be even more of a reason to widen the gap and help people to register to vote blue.

  • balderdash@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Emphasis on “your vote” I guess. I thought this post was going to advocate for protesting and civil disobedience.

  • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Well said my friend. And this is exactly why every non-vote favors Trump. The troll farms and propagandist will try to argue against this all day as long as it helps their agenda. But at the end of the day- this is just an indisputable fact.

    People need to vote like lives depend on it- because they do.

  • SOMETHINGSWRONG@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Yes, I remember clearly the Democrats pushing the “don’t care for who, just vote” campaign.

    And then Republicans started winning elections while losing the popular vote and Democrats decided to demonize the left and blame them for every loss afterwards, despite literally winning the vote.

    You can even see it here in this very post, where leftists are blamed for liberal apathy.

    You seem to be saying US Democrats are leftists. Why are you ignoring everything the DNC has done to villainize, marginalize, and destroy leftists movements in the Big Tent? Are you aware there is no “left” remaining to mobilize?

    • MrFunkEdude@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I only said “the left” instead of “the dems” to be more inclusive. If that was wrong, I apologize. My intent was not to “blame the left for liberal apathy” but to suggest we need to do more together.

      And yes, I agree that liberals should embrace leftists more, they are the ones who are trying to stand up for the rights of others more then any group in my opinion.

      So let me ask, what would you say is the best most actionable thing we can each do when it comes to safeguarding democracy this election? I mean that sincerely.