• EatATaco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    If you claim the campaign is saying something, but openly admit the campaign is not reaching you, then you are doing exactly what I said: not looking for yourself and just parroting what you were told the are saying.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Wtf are you even talking about? I’m so confused.

        This isn’t difficult. The Biden campaign is not saying what the OP is claiming they “see a lot of,” he has provided plenty of platform and has seemingly gone out of his way to me minimize mentioning trump (although I expect that the change). The claim that it’s happening a lot is just mindlessly parroting a talking points being fed to them.

        What don’t you understand about this?

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            So it was just a pointless comment that had nothing to do with the point.

            • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Does my comment have to fall in line with your point to be useful? I wasn’t aware I was in the presence of the sole person reaponsible for determining the course of the discussion, it’s an honor to meet you.

              • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                It doesn’t have to fall in line to be useful. But I suggest that if you are jumping in to challenge a point you make it clear that your point has nothing to do with the point being made. Most people are going to respond to things considering the context.