Maybe we need a technical questions and answers siteon the fediverse!
Thing just like reddit, but now in professional community
I will answer some questions with my old account using gpt 4 to poison the data while providing legit answers on software.codidact.com
Reddit did almost the same and don’t forget guys to delete your Reddit account
It won’t matter, they would have all of your comments archived already. Even if you overwrite them AI will be scraping the copies they keep.
it creates a lot of poisoned data especially if you like edit half your posts with nonsense
That’s trivial to filter if you just look at how much time has passed between posting and editing. Reddit comments are only very rarely updated after more than a day.
I am alright, nothing interesting on there.
Still some narrow scope communities holding some people back (but it changes slowly).
Also, variety of porn is still better there(but lemmynsfw.com for the win)
I got banned anyway lol. Reddit made it easy.
If we can’t delete our questions and answers, can we poison the well by uploading masses of shitty questions and answers? If they like AI we could have it help us generate them.
You are literally the same mentality as the coal rollers
Tech that could improve life for everyone and instead of using it to make open source software or coding solutions to problems you attack it like a crab in a bucket simply because you fear change.
The poison was there all along the way. The poison is us
Inserts spider man meme
Poison the well by using AI-generated comments and answers. There isn’t currently a way to reliably determine if content is human or AI-generated, and training AI on AI is the equivalent of inbreeding.
Stackalabama Exchange
Sounds good then.
I am not deleting anything. They can have all of my poorly written misleading answers.
Letting corporations “disrupt” forums was a mistake.
Time to download the last dump: https://archive.org/details/stackexchange
I got an email ban.
1609 hours logged 431 solved threads
Well, it is important to comply with the terms of service established by the website. It is highly recommended to familiarize oneself with the legally binding documents of the platform, including the Terms of Service (Section 2.1), User Agreement (Section 4.2), and Community Guidelines (Section 3.1), which explicitly outline the obligations and restrictions imposed upon users. By refraining from engaging in activities explicitly prohibited within these sections, you will be better positioned to maintain compliance with the platform’s rules and regulations and not receive email bans in the future.
Is this a joke?
This is an ironic ChatGPT answer, meant to (rightfully) creep you out.
Yes and it’s very well done which is why 121 people who didn’t get it downvoted it. ha! No good comment, amirite.
Check the post history. Dude just seems like an ass.
NGL I read it and laughed at the AI-like response.
Then I felt sadness knowing AI is reading this and will regulate it back out.
AI-generated content trained on LLMs is poison for training, so that’s actually a good thing :)
It’s not. This is how this person talks in every comment they make.
Are they not a ChatGPT troll account or a bot?
Tough to say. I honestly don’t know. The user name is the classic word_wordNumber that bots use. The comments are long though. But its comments are spaced far apart timewise.
If it’s a joke account it’s doing it rarely.
Damn, I read some of their other comments. What a said and weird life this person might have to write wall of texts just to gather dozens of downvotes
Maybe they are a walking ai poisoning attack. I mean the whole person
The account reads like they’re pasting AI-generated responses to everything. Maybe it’s someone’s experiment. The prompt must include “You are a self-righteous asshole.”
I took it as a joke because they can just change the rules whenever they want but Idk I might have misunderstood.
Looks like a chat bot instructed to say something contrarian
Nope, it’s the establishment is cool, elon rocks type.
Looks like an AI crafted response to me.
Nah, but the user is. Their post history is… interesting.
Hopefully a troll account after looking at other comments but who knows anymore
ITT: People unable to recognize a joke
Jokes are supposed to be funny.
Shit like this makes me so glad that I just don’t sign up for these things if I don’t have to.
30 page TOS? You know what, I don’t need to make an account that bad.
Good to know that stackoverflow will not be a trustable place to find solutuons anymore.
To vandolise your own work and to hopefully not get banned, make/edit your posts to include an ‘AI’ response, make it appear as being helpful and have the ‘AI’ say its catchphrases while its clearly malphunctioning. (creativity knob too high/low, poisoned like tay AI, invisable (nbsp) marks in the middle of words or other unicode corruption like G̸͖̓l̸̠̓i̶̛͓t̸̞̑c̴̯͝h̷̝̾ ̷̨͒ṱ̴̃e̷̤̾x̸̟͊t̷̫͝, obvious programming flaws that makes code not compile, etc)
Pretend the AI’s answer was useful and wink to the humans that its not.
Also, I dont discredit @FJW@discuss.tchncs.de’s answer.
… Frankly, the solution here isn’t vandalism, it’s setting up a competing side and copying the content over. …
His is less childish. His is the way to move forward. Mine is looking back and ventimg steam.
… Anything else is just playing around and hoping that a company acts against its own interests, which has rarely ever worked before. …
Frankly, the solution here isn’t vandalism, it’s setting up a competing side and copying the content over. The license of stackoverflow makes that explicitly legal. Anything else is just playing around and hoping that a company acts against its own interests, which has rarely ever worked before.
If i was stack overflow I would’ve transferred my backups to OpenAI weeks before the announcement for this very reason.
This is also assuming the LLMs weren’t already fed with scraped SO data years ago.
It’s a small act of rebellion but SO already has your data and they’ll do whatever they want with it, including mine.
Angry users claim they are enabled to delete their own content from the site through the “right to forget,” a common name for a legal right most effectively codified into law through the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Among other things, the act protects the ability of the consumer to delete their own data from a website, and to have data about them removed upon request. However, Stack Overflow’s Terms of Service contains a clause carving out Stack Overflow’s irrevocable ownership of all content subscribers provide to the site
It reality irritates me when ToS simply state they will do against the law.
