• floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    76 percent of cybersecurity experts use ad blockers.

    I’m a bit worried about that other 24%. How expert are they if they don’t recognize the risk?

    • hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      maybe they don’t enable js at all /s

      jk, maybe they value fingerprinting over that? even tor browser doesn’t have one built in.

    • psivchaz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      There’s some inherent risk in the ad blocker as well, though. If it’s an extension, you’re trusting that this thing you installed, that can read and modify every website you visit, isn’t going to do anything sneaky. Yes, maybe it’s open source, but every once in a while something sneaks into open source projects, too. It will get caught, but it could be after the damage is done.

      I mean, I use an ad blocker. But I don’t think it’s unreasonable to value security and not use one.

      • kadu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        But by that logic, absolutely everything other than standing still in a fethal position in a dark cave is a cyber security risk.

        Are you using an extremely solid version of Linux? Wellllll, sometimes bad actors can push bad code to open source projects! It’s a risk!