It’s not that complex. Stop trying to commit genocide against Jews. Get rid of Hamas who has tried to stop any agreement to give the Palestinians any land.
People often try to make things more complex because they’re trying to hide a weak argument.
If Hamas went away, the life of Palestinians would radically improve.
Right, so gonna continue on with this completely detached from reality nonsense while completely failing to respond to anything I say. This isn’t a conversation. I’m done beating my head against this wall. It’s clear you have no defense, are gaslighting people into thinking the destruction of Gaza is somehow “an active genocide against the Jews.”
You’re sick. And you’ll get older one day and realize you were on the “Nazi/Hutu” side of genocidal history. Gross. And shameful.
lol you never engaged with a single point I made and you’re literally trying, rather feebly, to gaslight me. After many attempts at actually engaging with you, you’ve proven to either be stupid or malicious and either way thoroughly unwilling to have a conversation.
Sometimes just gotta call a spade a spade. You refuse to respond to anything nor discuss in good faith—you literally have no defense besides “nuh-uh! ISRAE IS RUBBER AND PALESTINE IS GLUE!”
So just shut up. You’re not worth the time I spent trying to engage with you, let alone any further time. I’m happy to have a discussion. But that’s not what’s been happening here.
Ah another name calling session because you can’t articulate a point. You incorrectly couldn’t identify the genocide attack as declared by international law as the start of the current conflict.
lol sure, if that’s what’s needed to end this conversation, then you’re right, I love genocide, you’re an idiot and I’m name calling because I have no point, etc etc. Goodbye.
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
It’s not that complex. Stop trying to commit genocide against Jews. Get rid of Hamas who has tried to stop any agreement to give the Palestinians any land.
People often try to make things more complex because they’re trying to hide a weak argument.
If Hamas went away, the life of Palestinians would radically improve.
Right, so gonna continue on with this completely detached from reality nonsense while completely failing to respond to anything I say. This isn’t a conversation. I’m done beating my head against this wall. It’s clear you have no defense, are gaslighting people into thinking the destruction of Gaza is somehow “an active genocide against the Jews.”
You’re sick. And you’ll get older one day and realize you were on the “Nazi/Hutu” side of genocidal history. Gross. And shameful.
Oct 7th Hamas started a war with Israel. Israel is now dismantling Hamas. This was considered a genocide against Israel by international law.
Once Hamas is gone, the war will end.
It’s weird how you keep trying to defend genocide of the Jews.
Pure delusion. Or active gaslighting. Most likely the latter—unless you’re as dumb as can be? Also a distinct possibility.
Not sure why you are trying to insult people who disagree with your stance. Is that how weak your argument is ?
lol you never engaged with a single point I made and you’re literally trying, rather feebly, to gaslight me. After many attempts at actually engaging with you, you’ve proven to either be stupid or malicious and either way thoroughly unwilling to have a conversation.
Sometimes just gotta call a spade a spade. You refuse to respond to anything nor discuss in good faith—you literally have no defense besides “nuh-uh! ISRAE IS RUBBER AND PALESTINE IS GLUE!”
So just shut up. You’re not worth the time I spent trying to engage with you, let alone any further time. I’m happy to have a discussion. But that’s not what’s been happening here.
Ah another name calling session because you can’t articulate a point. You incorrectly couldn’t identify the genocide attack as declared by international law as the start of the current conflict.
lol sure, if that’s what’s needed to end this conversation, then you’re right, I love genocide, you’re an idiot and I’m name calling because I have no point, etc etc. Goodbye.
Removed, rule 5:
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
Removed, rule 5:
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!