Right, so gonna continue on with this completely detached from reality nonsense while completely failing to respond to anything I say. This isn’t a conversation. I’m done beating my head against this wall. It’s clear you have no defense, are gaslighting people into thinking the destruction of Gaza is somehow “an active genocide against the Jews.”
You’re sick. And you’ll get older one day and realize you were on the “Nazi/Hutu” side of genocidal history. Gross. And shameful.
lol you never engaged with a single point I made and you’re literally trying, rather feebly, to gaslight me. After many attempts at actually engaging with you, you’ve proven to either be stupid or malicious and either way thoroughly unwilling to have a conversation.
Sometimes just gotta call a spade a spade. You refuse to respond to anything nor discuss in good faith—you literally have no defense besides “nuh-uh! ISRAE IS RUBBER AND PALESTINE IS GLUE!”
So just shut up. You’re not worth the time I spent trying to engage with you, let alone any further time. I’m happy to have a discussion. But that’s not what’s been happening here.
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
Ah another name calling session because you can’t articulate a point. You incorrectly couldn’t identify the genocide attack as declared by international law as the start of the current conflict.
lol sure, if that’s what’s needed to end this conversation, then you’re right, I love genocide, you’re an idiot and I’m name calling because I have no point, etc etc. Goodbye.
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
Like, now the only side of the conversation that is still readable is the one that is supporting an active genocide. Because the comments that were, yknow, anti-genocide, used the word “idiot.” You see how insane that is, right?
Right, so gonna continue on with this completely detached from reality nonsense while completely failing to respond to anything I say. This isn’t a conversation. I’m done beating my head against this wall. It’s clear you have no defense, are gaslighting people into thinking the destruction of Gaza is somehow “an active genocide against the Jews.”
You’re sick. And you’ll get older one day and realize you were on the “Nazi/Hutu” side of genocidal history. Gross. And shameful.
Oct 7th Hamas started a war with Israel. Israel is now dismantling Hamas. This was considered a genocide against Israel by international law.
Once Hamas is gone, the war will end.
It’s weird how you keep trying to defend genocide of the Jews.
Pure delusion. Or active gaslighting. Most likely the latter—unless you’re as dumb as can be? Also a distinct possibility.
Not sure why you are trying to insult people who disagree with your stance. Is that how weak your argument is ?
lol you never engaged with a single point I made and you’re literally trying, rather feebly, to gaslight me. After many attempts at actually engaging with you, you’ve proven to either be stupid or malicious and either way thoroughly unwilling to have a conversation.
Sometimes just gotta call a spade a spade. You refuse to respond to anything nor discuss in good faith—you literally have no defense besides “nuh-uh! ISRAE IS RUBBER AND PALESTINE IS GLUE!”
So just shut up. You’re not worth the time I spent trying to engage with you, let alone any further time. I’m happy to have a discussion. But that’s not what’s been happening here.
Removed, rule 5:
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
Ah another name calling session because you can’t articulate a point. You incorrectly couldn’t identify the genocide attack as declared by international law as the start of the current conflict.
lol sure, if that’s what’s needed to end this conversation, then you’re right, I love genocide, you’re an idiot and I’m name calling because I have no point, etc etc. Goodbye.
Removed, rule 5:
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
lol no allowing for tone, huh? That’s idiotic…
Defending genocide? A-ok. Using the word “idiot” in the context of being flippant? That’s a big no-no. Cool rules.
Like, now the only side of the conversation that is still readable is the one that is supporting an active genocide. Because the comments that were, yknow, anti-genocide, used the word “idiot.” You see how insane that is, right?
I rescind my complaints and anger. Thank you for being reasonable.