You must log in or register to comment.
The left are handmade and the right, a employee got promoted for getting some Getty Images licensed.
… what?
Finder, Safari and Mail icons are iconic symbols created a loong time ago and thankfully apple didn’t butcher them completely when they got modernized. The rest are generic, but very much in a specific Apple style of icon born with the OS X.
Still soulless af.
If you found a person who had never seen any of these. they could accurately guess what most of the icons on the right are for. And they could probably only guess gimp from the left.
Also, the apple side are app icons, while the FOSS side are a mix of icons/logos/mascots.
Icons don’t need “personality” as much as they need to be descriptive and useful. And for Apple default apps, they don’t need to be branded with a flashy mascot, because they aren’t trying to win your brand loyalty, you already are using macOS, so they already won.
Yeah thats what soulless is in this case. The monopoly and locking users into only buying things with a bitten off apple.
Apple probably googled for some just cartoon style and used the first thing.
Everything on the left (except Tux) is terrible today and that’s fine, things evolve. It would be fun to see modern versions of each of those logos though.
I was so in love with Pidgin for a while that I even made a mock-up for how to improve it. I think I still have blog posts up about it.
I love pidgin, I’d still use it if they’d support OMEMO, OTR being outdated and all.
Including Tux, they look like they’re from the 90s (probably because they are). I’m glad we don’t see much of the branding mascots anymore, even Tux isn’t really heard of now.
All the mascots retired into SuperTuxKart.
Firefox 3 was published in 2008. This post is 16 years old.
How dare you to hate on Wilber and Gnu. Thoose look better than tux imo
Gnu, Firefox, and gcc are not terrible
I still use pidgin and finch… They’re admittedly wonky but the only way I’ve figured out how to get a lightweight client for m$ teams (need for work…)
I think they just meant the logos are terrible, rather than the software
Right side are all icons for the default apps that come with the OS, the left side are all apps that are independent from one another. A fairer comparison would be to use the icons for default apps for Mint for example, and…
I thibk both of these are fine. Certainly way better than most App icons on Android.
“Freelance artist for hire. Furry commissions and FOSS project logs a specialty.”
WHERE IS THE FUCKING LINK TO IT???
Hate to say it but its a parody. Link
I really really wanted this to be real. Most foss logos are pretty lame imo, and so is this one but it’s just too damn funny.
Ill take soulless thanks. Those terrible icons need to stay in 2004.
As a graphic designer, I would argue Apple’s designs are woefully behind on the times.
Soul is when cartoon animal
I wonder what is OPs take on Darwin mascot.
Probably that it’s perfect and full of soul
But it’s not really an animal.
Edit: just noticed fedora’s whateverthefuckthisthingis and it’s on the left.
I think it gets a pass. The only way for software to have soul is if its icon doesn’t indicate what the software does in any way.
I like the wonky icons on the left a lot. GNU is so unreasonably ugly, I can’t not love it.
If you scream you die.
One does not talk about the sandwich
Some GNU projects have amazing official logos:
https://www.gnu.org/graphics/package-logos.html
I like pascal especially.Rcutils is literally two turtles fucking lmao
Actually, I kinda like definition of fossy things being soul(ful?) vs soulless megacorp software. Even tho people are being both, the latter seem … at least selfish, lych-like perhaps.
