• HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    >Wikileaks selectively released information rather than being the safe harbor for all intelligence leaks that they purported to be.

    what makes you think that it was any more than only releasing important leaks? no one cares about the timeclock at mcdonald’s on 5th and main.

      • xor@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        curious how you’re obsessed with repeating that lie over and over again…

          • xor@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            keep on obsessively repeating that lie without actually checking it out, then

            • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              It’s not a lie, he refused to publish the Kremlin leaks for reasons I found paper thin. Sorry we don’t agree, I’ll refrain from calling you names because what’s the fucking point?

              • xor@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                yeah well can you provide a real source for that? maybe other than “one secret person told this paper, and by golly we believe them!”

      • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        wasn’t he taking asylum in russia? do you really think he should have made enemies there when the US et al were already trying to jail him?

        • ickplant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          You’re thinking of Snowden. Assange was at an Ecuadorian embassy in London. Two very different cases.

            • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              Someone who worked inside Wikileaks certainly felt they were newsworthy

              We had several leaks sent to Wikileaks, including the Russian hack. It would have exposed Russian activities and shown WikiLeaks was not controlled by Russian security services,” the source who provided the messages wrote to FP. “Many Wikileaks staff and volunteers or their families suffered at the hands of Russian corruption and cruelty, we were sure Wikileaks would release it. Assange gave excuse after excuse.”

              You can read more here

              • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                Foreign Policy endorsed Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. This was the first time in its 50-year history the magazine endorsed a candidate.

                you will forgive me if i don’t find your source to be credible in this regard.

        • PugJesus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          wasn’t he taking asylum in russia? do you really think he should have made enemies there when the US et al were already trying to jail him?

          what makes you think that it was any more than only releasing important leaks?