Democrats have all the spontaneity of the House of Windsor. Or, closer to home, they’re closer to what Republicans once were, a party that falls in line not in love.
Democrats have all the spontaneity of the House of Windsor. Or, closer to home, they’re closer to what Republicans once were, a party that falls in line not in love.
I read this as saying if you can’t build an electoral apparatus within the Democrat party capable of challenging the party leaders, your opinion doesn’t matter to the democrats
I love this “it’s not worth trying” attitude as an excuse to complain.
Weirdly, I haven’t heard anyone who was pushing for Dean Phillips or Marianne Williamson make that claim or that complaint. Maybe because they actually did the work.
>I love this “it’s not worth trying” attitude as an excuse to complain.
that’s not what I said. it’s a strawman.
Yes, I know your ‘if I don’t literally say something, any inference you make is false’ game. You played it yesterday too.
And, of course, you’re allowed to interpret what I say however you like.
it’s not a game. it’s just intellectual honesty
I see. The idea that you can interpret my comment any way you like but I are not allowed to interpret any of your comments except 100% literally is intellectual honesty to you.
Interesting.
I explained my interpretation. you lampooned me using quotes. it’s just a matter of intellectually honest engagement.
Wouldn’t the intellectually honest thing be to ask me what I meant rather than decide your interpretation was correct?
if it’s not, then you could correct it. what you did was argue with a strawman.
If you’re not a Republican, your opinion doesn’t matter to the Democrats.
10/10