And this is why Democrats will keep losing.

  • ArtemisimetrA@lemmy.duck.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    These aren’t Democrats we’re talking about, they’re just more affluent folks trying to keep their pockets lined. Moral bankruptcy is a required trait to be a politician these days apparently

  • IamAnonymous@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    10+ brand new accounts commenting in this thread, with 2 of them less than a day old. Did Lemmy get an influx of new accounts or are these bots?

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    People think the Democrats are losing relevance because they’re “Too woke”, and “No one cares about transpeople when there are bills to pay”

    It’s really because they do shit like try to compromise with someone who wants to kill you by agreeing to let them cut off an arm.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      “I don’t want any harm to me?”

      Republicans: I want blood. You have it. Give your body to me to harm.

      Democrats: Look he said he wants blood, have you considered they are frustrated with this economy? Maybe a figner as an olive branch will solve this. …not mine.

  • takeiteasypolicy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    i have a question - where is Kamala Harris in all this ? She lost the prez race and decided to just give up on her dreams of creating a better USA? This is the perfect moment for her to step up, invite people for resistance, lead that resistance and be the leader she claimed to be.

    • bishbosh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      She was a failed candidate in 2020, picked based largely on identity for VP by a presidential nominee that was really only liked as a remnant from a administration for which he was also picked largely based on identity. Towed the party line during increasing displeasure with the party heads, then failed spectacularly in an election.

      Even if I believed she truly had dreams of creating a better USA, it’s best for her to not be prominent member.

  • takeiteasypolicy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    At this point US needs leaders who can mobilize people and spearhead protest marches in the street. AOC is perfectly positioned to call for such protest march. If she does that and become figurehead of the Dem Allies against MuskTrump axis, she might get elevated to same status as MLK and may be even Lincoln. And on that note, why Kamala is quiet ?

    • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      And on that note, why Kamala is quiet ?

      Kamala Harris is the new Hillary Clinton. The GOP boogeyman and now political poison after she embarrassingly lost to Donald Trump.

      Kamala Harris was deeply unpopular both before and during the Biden administration, and (sorry to say it, but it’s true) she was largely picked because there was pressure for Biden to pick a minority female to “balance out” the fact that he was a white man. You know how some people, particularly (but not entirely) on the right, believe that affirmative action means that minorities end up getting positions that they otherwise probably wouldn’t have gotten because someone needs to fill a “diversity quota” or whatever? That’s how a lot of people felt about Harris – picked not because of her qualifications, but because she was a black woman.

      She’s basically been the poster child for this as far as the GOP is concerned ever since. And not in a good way. Right now, with anti-DEI sentiment gaining traction in this country at a record pace and DEI initiatives becoming political battery acid, the last thing you want as the face of the movement is someone believed to be the poster child for DEI initiatives run amok.

      • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 hours ago

        it wasn’t that badly by the numbers, it was badly by the electoral college….
        incidentally trump won every and only states that passed new voter suppression laws….

        this election was stolen and that’s only one piece of it….

        i still hate kamala, but she won.

    • nomy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      They’re helping a tyrannical government seize power. Time to exercise your rights.

      • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        “Tyranny is only when the evil Commie Leftists tell you that its wrong to call peoppe by slurs.”

        – Average 2A supporter mindset

  • boaratio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It should not be on her shoulders to explain this moment. The fact that she is able to articulate our current crisis is amazing.

  • nthavoc@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Both parties need to split up into new parties. However, the money flowing is incentive to prevent them from doing that. Party splits have happened before several times in US history. This time the billionaires are funding all of this chaos thanks to legislation they started passing since post Watergate. How do we get them to split? Take the money out or give them more money than the billionaires can. Both resolutions that should not require drawing blood. How do we do that? I have no idea how to fund more money than billionaires, but being somewhat of an optimist, 99% of the population can probably figure out a way once they stop this tribal mentality of red vs blue.

    • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      TBH we should probably stop regurgitating state propaganda trying to convince us that violence isn’t a valid form of protest.

      Because the rich have backed themselves into a corner where the only thing that will snap them out of their delusions of world domination is to be forced by the rest of us to confront their own mortality.

    • dustyb0tt0mz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      the population can probably figure out a way once they stop this tribal mentality of red vs blue

      which is never going to happen. one side has to lose. buy guns.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Once Conservatives and “centrists” stop handing power to the worst people we could probably just start reversing this global shift to the right even just with that. Progressive candidates are all over, we’re just too collectively stupid to vote for them.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It isn’t playing nice if you know the people you’re approving are fascists. It makes them rolling over even worse. Republicans had no issue obstructing whenever they felt needed.

    • RufusFirefly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’ve tried talking to Trump voters. It’s fucking impossible because they live in an alternate universe and see a completely different reality than everybody else.

      • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        There is no way to get through them tbh. They worship rich people want to be the next wealthy billionaire no matter what the cost. They have no demands of policy net positive for their own countrymen at all.

    • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      She suggested the full dem party to stop focusing on pronouns and idpol way back when Biden was still on ballots.

      She took her pronouns out of her bio which is 100% correct, no one cares about that shit

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      She’s saying the thing the Radical Tankie Left has been saying since the Clinton Era. It’s good to hear someone in her position repeating the message one more time. But the fact that it has to come from a fringe member of a fringe caucus, rather than - say - Hakeem Jefferies or Dick Durban, is depressing.

      We’re so far away from a McConnell style “We’re going to make Obama a one-term President” moment. Liberals simply cannot understand politics as conflict. Its always just make’n deals for your district’s rich friends and stuffing your own pockets along the way.

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    “We’re literally losing our democracy!!!”

    votes for it to continue for the 200th time in a row

    “How could this happen?!”

    helps them do it again

    • dx1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      They’re not even good enough. Both of them are turncoats. Bernie “the word genocide makes me quesy” Sanders is voting in Trump’s nominees. AOC endorsed Kamala and reinforced the “working tirelessly for a ceasefire” bullshit, every two minutes she’s folded on something new.

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        You know what, I’d take “not good enough” over “actively dismantling our democracy”, but fuck me I guess

        • dx1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Great, so we’re already “lesser of two evils”-ing our hypothetical new party designed to replace the Democrats. Just great.

          Here’s an idea. If we’re replacing the Democratic Party, let’s ONLY include people who aren’t traitors. Can we find five or ten people like that amongst the American population of 330 million people?

          • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Nah, I’m just saying you’re being too picky. Right now, I don’t really think there’s anything wrong with rallying around a message of “Not Trump, Not Fascism”. You know, considering those are the things that are currently dismantling our democracy.

            Calling people turncoats when they should be considered allies does nothing to fight the real, current threat in office. All this infighting just sets us back and puts us further down the road to fascism. This quest for the perfect liberal party is a waste of effort because it’s so pie-in-the-sky and borderline impossible to actually achieve in any meaningful length of time.

            It sucks, but that’s reality. Our democracy is fucked, and trying to find even more idealist liberals to replace the likes of Bernie and AOC isn’t gonna fix it.

            • dx1@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              I could not have been more clear - I completely reject the idea that we should be preemptively compromising our morals in a hypothetical new party designed to replace the morally compromised Democratic party. This is literally INSANE. Like, can we as a society even brush our teeth without compromising with the perpetrators of genocide and global empire? You’re already PLANNING a moral compromise for a political party that doesn’t even EXIST yet?

              • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                5 hours ago

                K good luck making any progress or solving any problems whatsoever then*. One day you might realize that the real world is shitty and messy and requires compromise.

                • dx1@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 hours ago

                  The moral compromises we’re talking about are literally giving up on solving problems preemptively. You’re talking about making plans for the future, designing new things from scratch, you have every tool in the world at your disposal, a blank canvas, and you take a huge paintbrush and dip it into a whole house-sized can of black paint and just start smearing it everywhere.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 hours ago

        AOC endorsed Kamala

        Right, I’m sure the current situation is better than endorsing Kamala…

    • nomy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      That’s part of what the republican partys done that’s made them so successful. If your representatives don’t represent you, primary them.

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Shit, Democrats don’t even give us a chance to primary, they just pick whoever they want.

        In NJ, they had what was referred to as the county line, which would basically put the Democratic party’s candidate first on a ballot. It was abolished this year, but the idea was that the positioning on the ballot made it easier for people to just vote down the line, but the result was that you didn’t necessarily have a fair vote.