My thoughts is that it’s a simple situation really. If they’re harassing or assaulting people, the women will call the cops or something, simple situation and get the guy arrested. If he’s not doing anything, it’s nothing harmful. Apparently that’s not a solid enough answer. What should I have said?

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The time for debating conservatives was over a decade ago. Now is not the time for debate. Now is the time to dethrone them. Marginalize hate by marginalizing the haters.

  • zoostation@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Is there a magical barrier that keeps men who don’t say they’re trans from entering women’s bathrooms?

    • 10_0@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes, peoples expectations, someone who’s obviously trans can use any bathroom, because it’s expected. If a guy walks into a girls bathroom the unknown becomes a real threat. Unless there’s a Karen then all bets are off. Tbh smaller establishments don’t need gendered bathrooms if it’s just a single toilet.

    • tonyn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The social contract, and the knowledge that it isn’t acceptable and any women inside would likely scream and the man would be perceived as an attempted rapist and would face consequences.

      • rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        So, no. I don’t think a rapist cares much if they’re perceived as a rapist. And a lot of (maybe most?) rapists know that they probably won’t be convicted even if caught.

      • ValiantDust@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        In my experience what happens is you look at each other confusedly for a moment, wondering who is in the wrong restroom. Then you realise there are no urinals so it’s probably the women’s restroom. Then the man leaves a bit embarrassed. Source: Happened to me at least twice (once the signs were really unclear).

      • TonoManza@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The social contract

        and the knowledge that it isn’t acceptable

        Rapists, well known followers of social contract who only do things that are acceptable…

        It’s not concerning at all that this didn’t seem immensely silly and wrong when you typed it…

        and any women inside would likely scream

        Because if a bathroom allows trans women, women will then be unable to scream while facing an attempted rape?

        the man would be perceived as an attempted rapist and would face consequences.

        Are you advocating that any man who even accidentally enters a woman’s restroom startling a woman be declared an attempted rapists?

        Otherwise, they will be considered an attempted rapist whether trans and allowed in the bathroom or not…when they start doing the attempted rape…

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yeah, this is probably the right way to go. There’s actually no bathroom police, for most people. It’s an issue in the first place because when someone is trans people will deputise themselves just to harass them.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s quite interesting to see them make this argument while also claiming that gun control laws can’t possibly work because criminals won’t abide by them.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I guess we need to allow everyone to use any washroom because we need a good man in the women’s washroom to be around to save the women from a bad man in the women’s washroom

  • Che Banana@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Uhhhhh there are no urinals in the ladies so everyone is in a stall? So???

    Does this fella want the ladies to shoot him?

    (Using the ladylike Darringer from her pocket book, saying “ah do declare” of course)

  • pezmaker @sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Nothing, they’re not genuinely interested in a discussion. They’re just trying to pin you with a bad answer and will keep moving the goal post until they think they gotcha.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      And if they can’t “getchya”, they’ll just stop responding or change the subject without ever acknowledging that you’ve proven your point.

    • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      This. ☝️

      It’s best to ignore them. There’s no use getting into an argument with someone who’s disingenuous to start with.

  • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Nothing.

    Nothing is good enough. Gendered bathrooms are about repression. That’s why they are so mad about non-gendered toilets that are popping up.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Gendered bathrooms are about repression.

      Oh Jesus Christ fuck me. “Help! Help! I’m being oppressed!”

      We’re in the middle of making a sensible culture shift. That’s all. I’m 53 and non-gendered toilets have been a thing forever, it just makes sense to make them more common. Some people don’t like that and some people have never been on an airplane.

      And some people scream “oppression” at the drop of a hat, making their screams seem far less serious. (Same goes for “racism!”.)

    • metaStatic@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Gendered bathrooms where a godsend for women.

      There was a time women couldn’t travel far from their home bathroom. it was called the lavatory leash.

      The current problem is bigots and “communal” toilets (in that order), not gendered toilets.

    • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      This has always confused me for years since this “debate” became part of public dialog.

      Why don’t we just have all non-gender bathrooms? A friend of mine used to live in an apartment building where the common area had 4 non-gendered bathrooms.

      Each had a fold-out changing table, a single toilet, and a sink, so everybody was accommodated. Men, women, non-binary, trans folks, a parent with their baby or young child, and disabled people because the door was wide enough for a wheelchair and the toilets had support bars next to them.

      Fully inclusive to everybody, and nicer than the typical restrooms because they were totally private.

      • troed@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes. A room with a bunch of stalls and sinks.

        European type stalls that is, floor to ceiling, real doors.

      • RagnarokOnline@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ve only been in a couple non-gendered communal bathrooms and it was a little odd, but only because I wasn’t used to it. The actual mechanics of it were basically the same as a normal bathroom. Go into a stall and do your business then come out and wash your mitts.

        I don’t have a problem with it being the standard. I guess I wouldn’t think it would be a good idea for high schoolers because they’re always in heat.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        When I try to recall the few non-gendered public bathrooms I’ve been in, they all had private stalls with real doors. It was nice. I’d be happy if all public bathrooms were like that.

        • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It would be cheaper to build actual walls in restrooms than to double their size systematically

      • mangaskahn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t have gendered restrooms in my house and people seem to navigate those just fine. I feel like it would work for public restrooms too.

        • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I actually prefer men and women separate restrooms because using the urinals is faster than going in to stalls, which reduces the wait time a bit. Then again, if you have two non gendered restrooms, you’ll get double throughput. Also, it would take a while to get adjusted to seeing both genders in the same restrooms, maybe I’m overthinking it, I’ve heard a university near me has non gendered restrooms only and the students are still adjusting to it.

          Apologies if I’m rambling.

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            a lot of queer spaces are converting regular bathrooms to gender neutral bathrooms and the signs often say “with urinals”… who cares if there’s a woman using the bathroom while you’re using the urinal?

          • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Nah you are good.

            The thing about this is that men are provided more space for essentials in the workplace, and making men stand to piss means less physically abled people have more trouble operating in that workplace.

            So outside the gender ick issues there’s equality reasons that gender neutral toilets are a good thing.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I’m trans and the only reason I stopped using urinals is because it freaked the men out too much lol

            They’re so convenient! You don’t have to touch them! And it feels like my bladder empties more completely when standing idk

            Gender! 👏 Neutral! 👏 Urinals! 👏

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Meh, urinals are pretty gross and you save pretty marginal amounts of time over quickly sitting down at a toilet

          • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I mean, you could have urinals in one room and then gender-neutral toilets in another room. Urinals and gender neutral toilets are not mutually exclusive I think.

  • Boiglenoight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Probably should have changed the subject or said goodbye. Arguing with conservatives is exhausting and usually in bad faith. It’s about winning, not exploring a topic together.

  • Dkarma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “in your biased example the fact that the person is trans isn’t relevant to anything…what’s your point?”

  • Icalasari@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Counter question: What stops a creep from doing that even if there was an anti trans law?”

  • No1@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    What should I have said?

    "Wow, sadly I think it means that person has some serious mental issues, and we should get them some help.

    Are you feeling okay? Do you want me to call someone for you?"

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t get why we have different bathrooms at this point. Its more efficient to just have them all be family bathrooms with floor to ceiling stalls.

    • ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Was at a brewery last night where the “bathroom” was a row of sinks, and then a row of doors labeled “sit” or “stand”. The commode cubicles were full length walls and doors, totally private, and this just makes so much more sense to me

      • Okokimup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Was at a church yard sale yesterday and they had the same setup. Pretty sure it was not a progressive church.

    • JillyB@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Amen! I went to a restaurant that had this layout. Each stall was like it’s own little room with a full sized door and a shared sink area. It’s more efficient use of space and you get a better stall. The only thing that I think would make it better would be a small side area with a couple urinals.

  • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The argument made by the person asking that question is not based on any realistic fear they have actually thought through. On the big list of gendered violence, a cis dude saying they are trans to accomplish… being present in a bathroom without themselves getting harrassed… doesn’t even register.

    Instead, this is just a typical attempt to punch down based on an imagined danger, usually on someone else’s behalf. There’s nothing an oppressor likes more than a piece of illogic that frames their target of oppression as, sneakily, the real oppressor. In this case, it is trans people wanting bathroom access without having to out themselves or to otherwise just not contradict their gender. Gender neutral bathrooms would also be acceptable, or even better, but cis people have insisted on gendered bathrooms. Rather than say, “yeah trans people shouldn’t have to put up with that cis bathroom bullshit”, reactionaries try to come up with ways to reframe the ask as its own form of oppression. This is also the mainstay of TERFs, basically just cis women that pretend trans women are oppressing them by wanting basic equal consideration.

    Depending on who this person is, you may want to try various tactics. If you think you can be flippant and dismissive of them, definitely do that preferentiallu. Make them feel like they are being ridiculous and that if they really care about violence against women they should work on guaranteeing housing for all and hate cops. If you can’t be flippant, I recommend still not taking it seriously but just changing the subject to the actual act of oppression and telling them more or less what I said in previous paragraphs. All of this assumes this us a person whose mind you want to change, like that of a friend or family member. If it is a colleague, start documenting their transphobuc comments and see if anyone else has your concerns, get their documentation as well. If it is just some rando, just tell them to shut the fuck up with bad faith transphobia and move on.

  • j4k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not saying I have the answers, but I typically attack the person’s desire for oversimplification and binary stupidity. Like, “Do you feel like this question encompasses all bathroom related issues?” It gives me the time to think, while also assessing their vulnerabilities from an unexpected redirection. I ultimately attack their confidence in forming questions by adding edge case exceptions to their simplified outlook.

    When someone poses a question like this, the are telling you that they lack depth. They do not have a good grasp of scales or complexity. They also lack the self awareness required to effectively empathize with others. This is a vulnerability that they have exposed. By exploiting this vulnerability, you invalidate their argument, take control of the rhetoric, and you increase the chance that their insecurity motivates growth of their self awareness at some later point.