• Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s too soon. She’s young; we want her to help the progressive cause for years and decades to come. If she were to become president in 2028, she would be retiring after she served, like every other president does, and we would lose her voice.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah better wait til she got old and lost her best abilities right? 8 years are 8 years no?

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        she would be retiring after she served, like every other president does, and we would lose her voice.

        That’s not a rule, you know. John Quincy Adams served in the House after being President, Andrew Johnson became a Senator, and Taft got appointed to the SCOTUS.

        • Drusas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I know, but it’s precedent. And I’m sure the secret service wouldn’t love her continuing to be active in politics.

        • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t know about Quincy adams, but the other two do not represent what I want more of in American politics

            • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 hours ago

              My point is that it’s too much to ask of her to be president for eight years and then continue nobly serving her country.

              The people who still want to be in politics after that aren’t doing it for good reasons.