• Drusas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s too soon. She’s young; we want her to help the progressive cause for years and decades to come. If she were to become president in 2028, she would be retiring after she served, like every other president does, and we would lose her voice.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah better wait til she got old and lost her best abilities right? 8 years are 8 years no?

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      she would be retiring after she served, like every other president does, and we would lose her voice.

      That’s not a rule, you know. John Quincy Adams served in the House after being President, Andrew Johnson became a Senator, and Taft got appointed to the SCOTUS.

      • Drusas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I know, but it’s precedent. And I’m sure the secret service wouldn’t love her continuing to be active in politics.

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t know about Quincy adams, but the other two do not represent what I want more of in American politics

          • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 hours ago

            My point is that it’s too much to ask of her to be president for eight years and then continue nobly serving her country.

            The people who still want to be in politics after that aren’t doing it for good reasons.