Snapchat is reserving the right to put its users’ faces in ads, according to terms of service related to its “My Selfie” tool (formerly “AI Selfies”), which allows users and their friends to create AI-generated images trained on their selfies.

Users have the option to opt out of this by toggling off a “feature” in the app called “See My Selfie in Ads,” but according to 404 Media’s testing this feature is on by default.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I cannot, I have had it for over a decade at this rate I think and my number associated is old now and I can’t log into to the website to delete. I can log into the app and use it but cannot delete it.

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    they know that the type of people who use snapchat of all fucking things either don’t give a shit, or are too ignorant to see it as an issue. if they ever read about this at all. at the end of the day, they know that not enough people will ditch the platform to make any difference

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      For anyone that has friends that can be convinced to move off snapchat:

      • it doesn’t actually delete things after the timer goes out, it just hides it from view. Sometimes the app bugs out and that data will be accessible again
      • signal has stories and the same format of disappearing messages
      • everything else that’s good about signal

      If what they want is the “One weird trick your doctor is hiding from you” style content on the discover page, then I got nothing.

    • Orbituary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’d say the same for Tiktok users. But that’s the popular platform, so it’s unpopular to criticize it.

      • theangryseal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I really did think that a Chinese social media company would never stand a chance here. I run into 80 year old farmers who ask me, “Did you see ‘at feller on TikTok who does ‘at thang with the tractor?”

        That same person will go on and on about China. People are neat.

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I can’t think of a way for this to be legal in the EU by any capacity. I really don’t. They’re essentially claiming they own your likeness just by using their app and I really doubt it’s that simple. It’s kind of like asking for your first born in a readme.txt of a github script. Just because you write something ridiculous doesn’t mean it’s legal.

  • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean, this is dumb, but it’s only ads specifically shown to you so it isn’t really a privacy issue. The headline seems like it’s intentionally trying to make it seem a lot worse than it is

    • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I don’t why you are so downvoted. Your comment didn’t come off as shilling for Snapchat or anything, and it just clarifies things for people who only read the headline. I appreciate the clarification.

      This is still an invasion of privacy, but not quite as egregious as using people’s faces in global advertisements. Obligatory fuck Snapchat, regardless.

    • simonced@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s still not a feature that users asked for. Hence why making it in the first place, is hiding some darker and creepier objectives.

      • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean yeah it’s a stupid feature that they probably shouldn’t have, I just think the headline is super misleading since it implies they would use your face to advertise to to others which isn’t true.

        • simonced@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The fact they think I want to see my face in ads, is dumb beyond belief. And they spent money on that lol.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You think that will stop them? They’ll just do it and pay a comparatively small fine to the government in a decade after they get around to investigating it. And that’s the best case scenario. More realistically nothing will ever happen.