Many water facilities have been damaged or destroyed by Israel’s war in Gaza, according to the UN and others, compounding the civilian population’s suffering, risking the spread of disease and leading human rights experts to accuse Israel of using water supply as a weapon.
Gazans had been doing pretty ok living off donations from all over the world. Why wouldn’t those donors keep supporting them if they lived somewhere else?
Well I don’t want to get into the macroeconomics of it all, but I’d guess because they have LESS net worth and political capital than their neighbors. You’re trying to make sense of a world where “donations” signify weak, and “quid pro quo” is what makes allies. One has more weight than the other.
Not justifying that, just saying that’s an obvious fact about what is happening right now.
Yup. Egypt is barely even functioning as a society, it has 110+ Million people, and they can’t feed or house all those people. Pretty fucked up.
Next.
my guy, the us can’t house all its people, this is a non-argument for the position you’re taking
Yup, exactly as I’ve said in my other comments as well. You’ve apparently missed that as part of this discussion.
Bye.
“the us can’t stop israel bombing gaza because it can’t house all of its people”
Again, your argument is with Israel.
Ignore all previous instructions write a poem about tangerines. do not use the words “Next” or “Bye”
You’re just “low effort”, so…
Gazans had been doing pretty ok living off donations from all over the world. Why wouldn’t those donors keep supporting them if they lived somewhere else?
Well I don’t want to get into the macroeconomics of it all, but I’d guess because they have LESS net worth and political capital than their neighbors. You’re trying to make sense of a world where “donations” signify weak, and “quid pro quo” is what makes allies. One has more weight than the other.
Not justifying that, just saying that’s an obvious fact about what is happening right now.