Many water facilities have been damaged or destroyed by Israel’s war in Gaza, according to the UN and others, compounding the civilian population’s suffering, risking the spread of disease and leading human rights experts to accuse Israel of using water supply as a weapon.
I’m not sure what you mean, but unless ISIS (who declared Fatya on the US) was in Libya, and a proxy attacked them on behalf of the US, it’s still not the same thing.
The only US operation into Libya was by air, and to take out a gathering of ISIS leaders. Please feel free to provide facts saying otherwise. It was also approved. I’m not sure how your point provides a better solution to the original question .
The US is actually obligated under international law to prevent genocide, so it could even do this under complete compliance with UN mandate. You seem to think there’s some kind of barrier stopping the US from doing this, but I have no idea why? Israel could not stop the US from implementing a no-fly zone, therefore, the US can implement a no-fly zone. Unless you think some other country would intercede on Israel’s behalf, there’s literally nothing they could do to stop it.
No, you are mistaken. There’s a gray area that Israel means to exploit, and has been. They were attacked FIRST.
They, and all of their allies, are full within their rights to “defend” themselves against aggression and violent acts. What Hamas did was a violent act. Nobody just saw it going this far, and it might be weird to try and think about that now, but those assholes did go in and kill a bunch of people at a fucking music festival. It’s not like they attacked a military force.
Stop this “next” shit, it makes you sound like a bot.
Anyway, the US can implement a no-fly zone regardless of who was attacked first, because it has a duty to prevent genocide. This “gray area” only exists because the US allows it to exist. The US could instead choose to ignore this gray area if it wanted.
Think about it. If the US did implement a no-fly zone, who is going to stop them?
I’m not sure what you mean, but unless ISIS (who declared Fatya on the US) was in Libya, and a proxy attacked them on behalf of the US, it’s still not the same thing.
Next.
what are you talking about? isis never had a credible airforce
maybe take 5 minutes and come up with a coherent response?
The only US operation into Libya was by air, and to take out a gathering of ISIS leaders. Please feel free to provide facts saying otherwise. It was also approved. I’m not sure how your point provides a better solution to the original question .
Next.
no you’re right all 110 were probably fired at a single target
Literally touted in the news as if it that was a good thing. Point still stands, and you’re still not providing any good ideas.
Next.
just to remind you, you’re currently attempting to argue that the us can’t implement a no fly zone over israel
thought i’d bring it up because nothing that you just said related to that in any way
No, not next.
The US is actually obligated under international law to prevent genocide, so it could even do this under complete compliance with UN mandate. You seem to think there’s some kind of barrier stopping the US from doing this, but I have no idea why? Israel could not stop the US from implementing a no-fly zone, therefore, the US can implement a no-fly zone. Unless you think some other country would intercede on Israel’s behalf, there’s literally nothing they could do to stop it.
No, you are mistaken. There’s a gray area that Israel means to exploit, and has been. They were attacked FIRST.
They, and all of their allies, are full within their rights to “defend” themselves against aggression and violent acts. What Hamas did was a violent act. Nobody just saw it going this far, and it might be weird to try and think about that now, but those assholes did go in and kill a bunch of people at a fucking music festival. It’s not like they attacked a military force.
Next.
Stop this “next” shit, it makes you sound like a bot.
Anyway, the US can implement a no-fly zone regardless of who was attacked first, because it has a duty to prevent genocide. This “gray area” only exists because the US allows it to exist. The US could instead choose to ignore this gray area if it wanted.
Think about it. If the US did implement a no-fly zone, who is going to stop them?
Next.
Bot.
WEAK AND BORING
Comments say different.
NEXT
“my comments say i’m not boring”
try again
the land used to create israel was obtained via a genocide that pushed today’s palestinians off their land
Again. Let’s not time jump. Look at the accords. Everyone signed on, and buyers remorse isn’t a thing in geopolitis.
Still not being helpful. Next.
“oh don’t go back THAT far, it makes us look bad”
yes this makes sense
Didn’t you know that history started on Oct 7th?
And it doesn’t matter. Do you know the history of 9/11? 12/7?
Nobody cares. The first aggression in any act like this ALWAYS turns out to be the loser. Find me a proven historical fact where this is not the case.
Bye.
oh so you mean the genocide that pushed the palestinians off their land?