• Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      There were plans, with the daughter joining the family business.

      FUBAR on Netflix isn’t terrible since it plays some of the same keys as True Lies, and it got renewed for a second season…but it’s painfully obvious that Arnold is too old for this stuff anymore.

      They tried a TV reboot adaptation of True Lies. It was baaad

    • Eldbogi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I once read that they planned on a sequel but then the terrorist attacks on the world trade center happened so they cancelled it.

      Something about not wanting to make fun of terrorism anymore.

  • graham1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. It did quite well when it came out, and it felt like there was potential for sequels

    • Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m surprised nobody has done a modern TV version. All five books have been successfully adapted for radio, the scripts are done, it’s already blocked out into well-paced individual episodes. It’s just sitting there waiting to be made. You just need a good cast and a show runner who isn’t going to monkey with the source material. It’s already proven to be popular and long-lived. Seems like a no-brainer.

      • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        All five books have been successfully adapted for radio

        As far as I’m aware, the first two radio series predate the books. So, in fact, they were successfully adapted into print.

        • angrystego@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Which I didn’t like at all, it felt too much like an audiobook to me, reading all the guide bits, not like an adaptation. Looks like you can never satisfy all fans at once.

    • turddle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ohh that’s a good one. The other books afterwards were great too.

      Would’ve loved a sequel and would honestly not mind them artistically fudging it a bit to pick back up with an older Arthur Dent

        • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Douglas Adams writing doesn’t translate well to film I think, a bit like Pratchett’s. It can be done (Good Omens was a great adaptation of Pratchett) but it’s probably super hard to do well and keep the original feeling/spirit

          • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            The 1981 TV series did a fine job, likely in no small part thanks to having Adams himself around and involved.

            I feel like any future HHG adaptation would need to be TV rather than theatrical film. That universe is just too full to condense meaningfully into a 90-minute blockbuster meant to keep the Hollywood lowest common denominator in their seats. You need room for all the multilayered apparently-random stuff interacting with each other in the particularly bizarre ways Adams was so good at pulling off, and it needs to capture the whimsy of the source material without devolving into the unremarkable formulaic stuff the latest TV attempt to do Dirk Gently on TV turned out to be.

        • BigPotato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I believe Adams himself considered each different medium to be “it’s own story” though just as he added and changed things from the radio play for the book, he also added and changed things in the movie screen play… When he was involved in it. I’m not going to pretend it was all his work but it was it’s own thing.

        • Fondots@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          And the book wasn’t living up to the original radio series

          Mostly kidding on that

          I agree that I like the book better, initially I disliked the movie, but I’ve come around on it, some things from the radio series were changed for the book, and so it just kind of feels right they’d further change things for the movie. Playing a little fast and loose with it feels very in the Douglass Adams spirit to me.

    • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      As far as I can remember the Movie did terrible, especially since it didn’t really stick to the source material

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Daemons and talking polar bears. I was sold.

        I personally am not bothered by sticking to the source material or not. Books and movies are fundamentally different.

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m usually fine with not everything from the book making it to the movie, but changes to the plot need to be very well reasoned for. There were for example a lot of changes to the structure of LotR when Jackson adapted it, but they didn’t change the overall plot or message, mostly just restructured it.

    • Donebrach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve never read the series but the His Dark Materials television show is really well produced. Not sure how closely it follows the books but as far as I understand it’s pretty faithfully executed.

    • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The trouble with the movie was that the studio got scared out of continuing by fundamentalist Christian groups who really objected to the central premise of the books; namely that God can be killed and all life will be better off for it.

      They then fumbled the shit out of it, editing it so poorly that what they did make was a jumble of shit that no one who wasn’t familiar with the stories would care to see, and no one who loved the books would be happy with. For me it was shit like revealing Lyra’s parentage right at the beginning, rather than it being a huge surprise as in the books.

      It was a massive shame though, because the casting was damn near perfect. If they’d got Sam Elliott back to reprise the role of Lee Scorseby for the BBC adaptation, I’d have been as happy as a pig in shit. To my mind he is Lee. Lin Manuel Miranda was fine, but lacked the essential taciturn nature of the character as written. And Sir Ian McKellan as Iorek? Perfect.

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I got around to watching it a few years ago, and holy shit is it ever better than everyone says it is. It’s SO FAR ahead of its time—it feels like an early-to-mid 2010’s Adult Swim movie. Ebert can fuck right off, it’s a comedic MASTAPIECE.

      I never saw it back in the days where it was sooooo critically panned. It seems to have aged swimmingly.

      • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Wow. I caught it on a channel recently and watched the first 20 minutes and had to turn it off. That style of humor is so outdated imo. Tom Green’s comedy is just being awkward and repeating the same thing(s) over and over.

        I’m glad you still enjoyed it though. I know it’s highly regarded as a cult classic. I just couldn’t stand it myself. I’m in my 40s btw, so I grew up during the Tom Green era of popularity.

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m a bit younger, in my 30s. I also enjoyed the Tom Green show growing up. I think I might be biased because I love his antics and I was tripping acid when I saw it.

      • lugal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        You call it a trilogy because you reject the fourth one

        I call it trilogy because I reject the first one

        We are not the same

        Jokes aside, I would call 2&3 a long movie, which makes it a trilogy again. One mistake is to see them as separate

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          It became a parody of Godzilla movies for no real reason. And it came out of nowhere. I call it the movies 4th act.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          …uhhhhhhh, I would ask your mom if she smoked while pregnant with you. There’s clearly something wrong with the development of how your brain came out.

          • PoopingCough@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Look, I’m not saying any of them come close to the original, but imo it’s the second best of the series (including all the dogshit jurassic worlds) because it sticks to what made the first one great; small amount of people trapped on an island with dinos. The Lost World was like half that but then it turns in to some weird almost king kong-esq thing. Also i love me some Goldblum but he’s better as a foil imo and Chris Pratt has nowhere near the gravitas as Sam Neil. Like really besides the annoying parents what do you not like about the third one?

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Jurassic World is a guilty pleasure of mine.
        It’s good enough to grip you and at the same time so predictable and full of clichés it’s also funny.
        Plus, Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard are both hot as hell.

  • nycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The Road to El Dorado was the pilot for an animated series that never got greenlit. Massive missed opportunity, I would love to see “the continuing adventures of three latin rogues and a horse”

    • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      At the time animated series didn’t have the same quality they do today, I suspect it’s reputation is so good because there’s no subsequent animated series.

  • azimir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Jumper. It was setting up an interesting world with more depth than the first movie could delve. I loved that one of the characters was so cool that the author of the original novel went out and wrote another book just about the movie’s character and it rocked.