TehBamski@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 29 days agoWhat Film Are You Surprised Didn't Get A Sequel?message-squaremessage-square263fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1message-squareWhat Film Are You Surprised Didn't Get A Sequel?TehBamski@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 29 days agomessage-square263fedilink
minus-squareTracked@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·29 days agoWhat’s up with denying the trilogy? The shitty PC era movie I get it. But the sequels were excellent, the symbolism and how smith is defeated it’s brilliant. I bet you wanted a copy of the first movie.
minus-squarelugal@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·28 days agoYou call it a trilogy because you reject the fourth one I call it trilogy because I reject the first one We are not the same Jokes aside, I would call 2&3 a long movie, which makes it a trilogy again. One mistake is to see them as separate
What’s up with denying the trilogy? The shitty PC era movie I get it. But the sequels were excellent, the symbolism and how smith is defeated it’s brilliant. I bet you wanted a copy of the first movie.
You call it a trilogy because you reject the fourth one
I call it trilogy because I reject the first one
We are not the same
Jokes aside, I would call 2&3 a long movie, which makes it a trilogy again. One mistake is to see them as separate