His intervention comes as the presidents of Brazil, Mexico and Colombia all called on Venezuela to release the full details of last Sunday’s election.

It has also attracted global criticism, with many governments around the world demanding the Venezuelan government release proof of the result.

The result has been recognised by Venezuelan allies China, Russia and Iran.

But, the US, European Union and other G7 countries have called on Mr Maduro’s government to release detailed voting data.

    • AmidFuror@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Please make your point explicit. Ronald Reagan and other right-wingers opposed the Soviet Union. Does that mean the Soviet Union should have remained intact and counter-revolutionaries in Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and Poland kept suppressed?

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ronald Reagan and other right-wingers opposed the Soviet Union. Does that mean the Soviet Union should have remained intact and counter-revolutionaries in Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and Poland kept suppressed?

        Tankies like them would have loved that.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Let’s bring it full circle:

        Now, you may notice that some of these people were elected, while one was not.

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Thank you for helping me make my point that posting a picture with politicians together is pretty meaningless. Anyone paying even the slightest attention to Venezuela knows Machado is a conservative. That doesn’t preclude the election from being rigged.

          • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            With such precedents, it is impossible to associate the image of María Corina Machado with that of a supposed positive change for Venezuela, an image she intends to present by claiming the status of an “outsider,” even though historically she has positioned herself as a political figure of the opposition establishment. The actors and influences that she promotes on Venezuelan soil come from outside the borders of the country and respond to political agendas in Florida and Washington DC. source.

            Marco Rubio and Rick Scott agree with you.

            • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Your source is bunk

              And when it’s not safe for political dissidents to live in their home nation it’s not uncommon for them to be sheltered by a foreign government. Shit, the Kaiser is the one that sent Lenin back to Russia.

                • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Yeah I don’t find that particularly palatable, but it’s still up to the people of Venezuela to decide who they want to lead them. This election result is a sham as far as it looks right now.

        • voluble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Ahh, the US-Russia summit in Geneva in June 2021.

          U.S. President Joe Biden and Russian President Vladimir Putin, whose countries hold 90% of the world’s nuclear weapons, agreed at a June summit in Geneva to embark on an integrated bilateral ‘Strategic Stability Dialogue’ to lay the groundwork for future arms control and risk reduction measures.

          Reuters - U.S. and Russia say they held ‘substantive’ arms control talks in Geneva

          Simpler times.

  • FireTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The result has been recognised by Venezuelan allies China, Russia and Iran.

    The three countries most well known for their open and fair democratic processes.

    /s

  • DancingBear@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    We also have overwhelming evidence Blinken has supported multiple coup attempts in Venezuela throughout his career.

    Downvote actual facts if you like, you’re only showing your bias.

      • DancingBear@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        You have this idea in your head that because you fully believe your news sources, that I am somehow in opposition to whatever your ideology on this issue is.

        My goal is to point out that nothing western media or the US government has said or is saying is reliable on issues specifically concerning Venezuela, for at (the very) least the past three decades.

        “I’m giving you a choice: either put on these glasses or start eatin’ that trash can.” ——-Nada, from the movie They Live.

      • DancingBear@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        lol. You’re arguing that Blinken trying to overthrow the Venezuelan government in the past is a whataboutism to any discussion of Blinken trying to do it again, right now even?

        It would be laughable if it wasn’t so pathetic

        Y’all cable news watchers use Orwellian talking points without a lick of irony. Wow

        • stellargmite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I don’t have any skin in this game, but what are the Orwellian talking points you refer to? I’m curious how this term is used and develops over time.

          • DancingBear@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            You’re suggesting the opposite of a thing is the thing, in this case it is Blinken having supported multiple coup attempts in Venezuela being a non relevant talking point to him currently supporting a coup in Venezuela

            I would say “currently supporting another coup he supported last election” but nah, we’ve already established this is somewhere between his support of coups in Venezuela 12-15 times

            Thanks for asking

            Edit; it wasn’t you it was the other guy who was using the Orwellian double speak or whatever

            He suggested that me mentioning blinkers previous support of coups in Venezuela during a discussion about blinkens support a a current coup attempt in Venezuela is a whataboutism or what not

            • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              If somebody losses the election and still rules, that person/party are there ones who made a coup. Opposing this statement can only mean you support any and all dictators as long as they role play as a democracy once every few years.

      • DancingBear@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Absolutely, but if you were really interested in facts this information is not hard to find once you stop watching cable news……

        I doubt you’ll read any of it but here is a random google search….

        Details of a dozen or so coup attempts by us government

        https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv2tr51zb

        Details of Blinken’s work history in the us government over this same period

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antony_Blinken#:~:text=He previously served as deputy,Biden from 2009 to 2013.&text=Yonkers%2C New York%2C U.S.

        Bias report on the jstor.org showing reporting credibility as factual and also detailing any of their bias etc

        https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/jstore-daily/

        If you believe western media and United States governments reporting on issues in Venezuela, you’re critical thinking ability is non existent.

        I’m not an expert on Venezuela, but again, western media and the USA government has zero credibility on issues concerning Venezuela.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          If you believe every protest is a CIA backed coup attempt then nobody can help you.

        • enbyecho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Absolutely, but if you were really interested in facts this information is not hard to find once you stop watching cable news…… I doubt you’ll read any of it but here is a random google search….

          Your snark, arrogance and cynicism are unwarranted and inappropriate.

          But I do appreciate your providing some info - I was genuinely curious and didn’t quite know where to find this evidence - initial searches did not turn up the kind of “overwhelming evidence” you claimed existed. I’m not for a second disputing the USA’s involvement in coup attempts or regime change in general - I think this is quite adequately documented. But your claim was that there is “…overwhelming evidence Blinken has supported multiple coup attempts” but the best you can do is to essentially say he’s guilty of this personally because he has worked for the US government.

          That’s honestly pretty weak.

          • DancingBear@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            lol. You’re saying that without irony.

            That’s not me being arrogant, I nailed it, I just did a slam dunk in your face after I alley-ooped my own pass.

            And when your audience has zero critical thinking skills it’s probably the most appropriate time for cynicism.

            Yes, I hate to break it to you but folks working for the leadership in the state department and national security of the us government are complicit in US backed coup attempts.

            But your attempt to straw man my evidence is a sorry attempt to deflect from the actual fact that the United States and western media completely fabricate most everything anytime they open their lips to speak on issues concerning Venezuela.

            • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              That’s not me being arrogant, I nailed it, just did a slam dunk in your face after alley-ooped my own pass.

              Not only arrogant, but cringe.

              Sad to see “useful” idiots like you who probably don’t even know where Venezuela is, but as long as they are against the US they have to be good, right?

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    People should question the USA every time they talk about South American countries. The same as how people question China or Russia when they talk about bordering countries. Super power will do what they can to influence other countries and historical and recent events make it clear that the USA is willing to lie and defend its lies. So people have the right to not believe the USA.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Sure. When it’s appropriate. But it isn’t appropriate here. There are third party organizations with no love for the US also making statements about this.

        • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Nothing in @Doorbook@lemmy.world’s comment implied that.

          You are a liar.

          The same as how people question China or Russia when they talk about bordering countries.

          Also…Why do you think

          Not everyone is as bad a student of history as your peers.

      • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s not whataboutism, it’s good to look at the history and motivations of anyone making claims like election fraud. US officials are saying it’s fake, the US has a long history of South American political interference, especially if there is even a hint of socialism.

        • Gsus4@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          So you saw Maduro’s disaggregated numbers and they check out. Share them, please, everybody else wants to see them too.

          • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I don’t think they are staying Maduro won. Polls showed this was going to be a landslide against him. Can’t trust polls especially in a dictatorship but I think there’s something there. I know in my heart he lost.

    • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Evidence was literally uploaded by the opposition, and has been analyzed by multiple news organizations already who agree with their conclusions. Not to mention the exit polls and other available public evidence.

      https://ca.news.yahoo.com/masked-assailants-ransack-venezuela-opposition-134849213.html?guccounter=1

      Here’s another organization that independently gathered many of the polling receipts with similar results:

      https://supervisiondev2.metabaseapp.com/public/dashboard/6b2f7b3b-16ec-4af6-84c7-69c39ee2139d?tab=16-english

      The opposition leader is in hiding (who was barred by Maduro’s government for running, among many other tactics with government powers Maduro used to try to tilt the vote in his favor). Maduro has rounded up over 1000 members of the opposition already to try and prevent this data from being gathered and take more political prisoners. The Carter Center, who Maduro government themselves invited as a monitor, said that:

      “Venezuela’s electoral process did not meet international standards of electoral integrity at any of its stages and violated numerous provisions of its own national laws.”

      https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/01/americas/venezuela-election-opposition-machado-hiding-intl-latam/index.html

      The only one fighting transparency and trying to hide results here is Maduro. These tallies were all stored on qr codes. Maduro could have released them at anytime and chose not to. Could have instantly been released the night of the election, as they were coming in if he wanted. Can’t believe people on here are still falling for this dictator’s bald faced lies.

      • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        From what I heard, the government released them on a website but it got hacked and shut down. Now he released them to the Supreme Court and invited the opposition to look at them, but they didn’t show up.

        I don’t agree with them arresting opposing candidates and stuff like that, but I also don’t trust the US’s opinions on this matter. They’ve tried to coup Venezuela basically every year and every election lol. The opposition releasing their interpretation of data is like Trumps saying they should’ve won from their polling data in all the red states. Idk, it’s very easy to manipulate, especially with US help.

        • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          The government did not release them, and you’ve provided no source for your claim. Also, showing up to a courthouse as they’re all rounded up and being thrown in a jail? Give me a break. Many countries are calling for the release of the results, including leftist governments like Colombia and Brazil.

            • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              There’s nothing in the source you linked about Maduro releasing results online and some “hack” not allowing it. Maduro has not released any results.

              The source you linked does report all the things I’ve said in my comment again though.

              And it’s not just rhetoric, he is jailing his opposition.

              • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Sorry, I guess I was mistaken. Looks like the story is he tried to release them but got hacked. Thanks for catching that.

                Right, but because they’re protesting and rioting. Even the US has done that for less. And within the last couple months.

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Their Supreme Court is very biased towards PSUV. Letting them weigh in is like letting a fox count how many eggs are in your henhouse.

    • kata1yst@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Because the official evidence is held by the incumbent government. The evidence we do have access to, from extensive exit polls by neutral auditors to the mandated voting station slips (small pieces of paper that each voter is issued giving them the electronic count so far at that station) both track a 60 - 70% lead for the opposition.

      In response, instead of releasing the official report, the incumbent government has brutally crushed several protests (even killing protestors), arrested the opposition, and claimed victory. Not exactly the pattern of behavior of an innocent victor.

      • BossDj@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Just to clarify, the evidence provided by opposition is not from exit polls. The evidence is genuine voting receipts from the machines that are supposed to be* guaranteed to each party’s site observers

        *Opposition says many of their observers were removed without being allowed access to their polling site receipts to explain why they didn’t have them all

        The electronic machines provide every voter a paper receipt that shows which candidate they chose. Voters are supposed to deposit their receipts at ballot boxes before exiting the polls.

        After polls close, each machine prints a tally sheet showing the candidates’ names and the votes each received. Party representatives stationed at polling sites throughout election day get a copy of the tally sheet, and electoral authorities keep another one.

        AP News

        • kata1yst@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          So release the official counts and let people compare their voting slips? Don’t arrest your opposition?

          If it quacks like a dictatorship and stinks like a dictatorship…

            • Valmond@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Lol sure. No other website can hold the data either, it’s gone now, like in an internet tube, vanished I say.

              What an idiot lie.

            • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Of course, there is only one available domain to do this, and that was hacked. There is no possible other way to get that data out but that one website. And it is, forever, hacked.

  • sandbox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    None of this “overwhelming evidence” has been presented to the public. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Opinion polls don’t count for shit. Show me proof of a fixed election and I’ll believe you, but right now this entire thing stinks of the US not getting to control Venezuela and being really fucking mad about it.

      • sandbox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Thank you so much for being the only person to actually deliver what I asked for instead of some bullshit sermon. This looks legit. I will amend my original comment.

    • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m sure you’ve done tons of research into these claims and are certainly not just making a loud uninformed take

      • sandbox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’ve read a few articles. They’re all like, “we have sooooo much evidence that the election is rigged! Just so much!! But it goes to another school, so just trust me bro.”

        I’m very happy to be proven wrong, if you have anything compelling to share, please do.

          • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Exactly. The opposition keeps saying they have proof but not revealing it. It’s all very Trumpian. They aid they have proof the election was fixed, too. I’m starting not to believe the US in this one.

            • teamevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              I mean kinda me too…what I’m really afraid is that is foreshadowing November here

              • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Oh damn, now you have me worried, too lol. I 100% bet Trump his team and their supporters will look to this election for lessons.

                To be clear, I don’t think Maduro is a good guy at all, and he seems to be handling this terribly. But that only makes Venezuela easier to do this with, especially considering US interests in the region. (Insert Elon Musk’s “we can coup whoever we want” quote here.) Hopefully it all becomes clearer after the deadline Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia gave them to release full data and figure this out. Those 3 countries seem to be handling this the best by reaching out to both parties and handling this in a slow, calm manner. I’m trying to keep an open mind like them until then.

        • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          They don’t. And they don’t need to! Being rude at people who disagree with the US State departments official position (which is not propaganda) is good enough, because propaganda = opinions that are not in line with the US state dept.

          They believe that “fact” so powerfully that theyll get angry at you and insult you. Other facts become unnecessary if the person saying them is untrustworthy. Uncomfortable truths, any thoughts about the US’s many, many efforts to control the global south may be terminated along with the messenger.

          Besides people use Ad hominem because it’s just so easy

          • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Do you read what you have written and think, “yeah, that was a reasonable take?”

            People are literally pointing this person toward the information they claim doesn’t exist. A few people were abrasive about it bc it comes up under an easy search. But they’ve ignored it, double down, and been dismissive.

            Say what you want about the hive mind of Lemmy but be honest about this interaction.

            • sandbox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Nobody pointed me towards anything until now and I literally immediately said “thank you” and amended my comment.

              It literally does not come up after an easy search. Someone had to directly link me to a strange website that I’ve never heard of before so I could see the proof.

              And you’re scolding people for being dishonest? lol

          • sandbox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            This is a story about it, I’d love to see the scans, where are they?

            Edit: Never mind, another user shared the link.

            • AmidFuror@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Not everyone can have every expertise. You can dismiss a tally sheet written in crayon, but would you know an authentic one from a forgery? Some things have to be left to experts, like rocket scientists, nuclear engineers, and oncologists.

              • sandbox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                That is totally irrelevant. I specifically asked for the evidence, not for some journalist’s report on what some source said about how they got the evidence.

                If you asked me for proof that Elon Musk tweeted something, I’d link you the tweet, not a report about how people are reacting to Elon’s tweet.

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          You can download the voter sheets that the opposition is presenting and investigate it yourself. Thankfully the AP already has (I trust them enough for this) and it indicates the government of Venezuela is lying

          • AmidFuror@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I know we’re not supposed to accuse others of being disingenuous actors on behalf of a criminal state, but it’s getting hard to believe this many supposedly well read people are so ignorant of what happened in Venezuela.

            • sandbox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              People are quite rightly skeptical of mass media narratives. If presented with actual evidence you’ll find that people are willing to believe things. 99% of the coverage of the election in Venezuela has been spin from their political enemies.

          • sandbox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            There’s no need to act like an asshole. I asked for proof, nothing more. Despite the dozens of people who downvoted me, only one was able to provide it, and it doesn’t show up on a Google search (due to the amount of blog spam about the topic, I suppose)

            I haven’t seen that proof shared anywhere else. Have you? If so, where?

  • b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Maybe America should stop genociding Palestinians before trying to act like some kind of moral authority on other countries.

      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Prominent journalist and Russia expert Peter Pomerantsev believes Russia’s efforts are aimed at confusing the audience, rather than convincing it. He states that they cannot censor information but can "trash it”

        The effect created by such Internet trolls is not very big, but they manage to make certain forums meaningless because people stop commenting on the articles when these trolls sit there and constantly create an aggressive, hostile atmosphere toward those whom they don’t like. The trolls react to certain news with torrents of mud and abuse. This makes it meaningless for a reasonable person to comment on anything there.

        Fuckin spot on

        I would replace “torrent of mud and abuse” with “torrent of mud and hostile opinions presented in the most argumentative possible way”, but yes pretty much

        Look around this comment section, and then come back and reflect on that “meaningless for a reasonable person to comment on anything”

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You really just went straight for the whataboutism? The US and Venezuela can both do bad things.

          • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Why does the U.S. need to hold Maduro accountable at all? Venezuela is a sovereign country. People got upset when Russia meddled in America’s election. How is it okay for the U.S. to meddle in Venezuela’s? Sanctions. Funding opposition parties. Take it to the UN 🇺🇳 and respect their decision. The world is growing tired of America policing their internal politics and their choice of diplomatic allies.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Because Maduro is screwing with our allies in South America. But also because supporting actual free and fair elections is the right thing to do.

              And you’re so hyped up on this America whataboutism you’ve missed that the majority of South America is also calling bullshit.

              Is Panama interfering? Colombia? Peru? Qatar? The UN? They’ve all been critical of this election too. Or is it just when the US is critical?

              • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Was the election fair or unfair?

                I don’t know. And anyone claiming they do is not objective.

                But we do know that the U.S. has a history of interfering in elections in South America, especially in Venezuela in 2002 and 2019. Knowing this, it is reasonable to believe that this election was manipulated for American interests. Until more information is revealed, it’s just a case of “he said, she said.”

  • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I thought Venezuela hasn’t had a legitimately elected government in a very long time. Was something different this time?

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Chavez won, at least, his first election fairly and in a landslide. So, it’s been up to 25 years since the last free and fair election there.

  • generichate1546@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m going to wait until I see primary evidence, the US doesn’t have the most honest track records with South American countries

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not just that, but it’s also that Anthony Blinken wrote Israeli propaganda articles since 80s.

      If you like conspiracy theories, he may have been familiar to J Epstein, who may have had ties with Mossad (then that whole pedophile operation makes perfect sense as a very efficient way to blackmail a lot of powerful people, and him offing himself makes more sense).

      If you don’t, the fact stands that Anthony Blinken has acted in the interests of a foreign fascist state since 80s.

      This may be a bit philosophical, but South America in general has much more progressive approach to international law than the rest of the world, the Montevideo convention as the most notable example, but also the first country to recognize the Armenian Genocide was Uruguay, and despite all the dictatorships, crime and trafficking I’d say in some sense it’s still the least fascist part of the world.

      In any case, who in their right mind really believes Maduro won? But I’m sure even Venezuelan opposition doesn’t want US to protect them Desert Storm style.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      What are you talking about the US has never done anything bad in south America, unless you count Brazil, Argentina, Bolivia, ans Chile. Yeah the list is surprisingly short in south America.

    • sik0fewl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Why are these things always split across ideological línes? It’s obvious no one even looked at the results and are just cheering for their own team.

      If it was US/Iran vs China/Germany then it would be much more interesting.

      • Flumpkin@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’d say history. But it’s not even that. The US is at war with venezuela and always has been. Just kidding it’s eurasia. Nah haha but they are waging economic warfare. Well Trump did and Biden continues to.

        So should you believe the US claims? You’ll have to as your ideological master programmer of course. It’s not like you could just use historical facts and make some clear logical deductions!

        So yeah it’s ONLY a matter of ideology and opinion /s

        Oh btw Trump also really won the last US election and Biden isn’t even President. It’s not like these things are different in any way - one side is right, the other is wrong, and it’s only a matter of opinion.

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The US removed sanctions against Venezuela on condition that they would run fair elections. Of course they are involved, they need proof to know what to do with the sanctions.

      • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        All the more reasons america would want to manipulate the elections. If they stop their sanctions socialism could actually work and they cannot allow that.

        • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Ocamm’s razor.

          If they didn’t want to lift sanctions, they would just not lift them. If they did lift them, it’s because the US actually wanted fair elections. There’s not more to it.

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Did the US remove sanctions on Pakistan on condition that they run fair elections? I ask because I don’t know. What I know is that they did so with Venezuela, and yet maduro didn’t run free elections.

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        No the US backed a coup in Pakistan against Imrah Khan.

        Imran Khan did not want to get involved in the Russia-Ukraine war and the US wanted a Pakistani president who picked their side.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      If Maduro had acted like a good suckup dictator, all of this would be declared “internal matter of Venzuela” and Blinken would have moved on lol.

      But no, he had to refuse the US’s foreign demands like he has sovereignty or something. Now we actually have to coup him for real this time, and make it look like we upgraded the democracy while doing it.

      spoiler

      But seriously rip Imran Khan. Pakistan had one big chance to save itself and it took the army like 5 seconds and a tiny IMF loan from the USA to burn it all down.

    • Gsus4@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      dunno, don’t speak Urdu, not close to me. It’s just really annoying for Latin Americans to see “gringos” immediately forming an opinion on something they have no idea about and making it about themselves, both to meddle and to dismiss. Listen to other countries than the US and what they are saying, preferably in the local language.