• 0 Posts
  • 959 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 15th, 2024

help-circle

  • You need technology cheaper than fossil fuels. Some of fossil fuels’ downsides are upsides for some people (political control), which necessitates the difference in cost by a big enough margin to counter those invisible benefits. A revolution.

    There’s no urgency, I think, because Earth’s population is going to start shrinking. The emissions are going to slow down for that reason.

    Countries that won’t have some quality, not quantity, approaches to their economies by then are going to fall hard.

    I guess that’s how EU is going to make the world owned by Europeans again.


  • It’s simple, you have a shared resource running out, nobody wants to grab less of it.

    Grab less of it yourself - the others will compensate for you. Produce some of that resource - the others will just profit from it for longer.

    The biggest emitters are too strong to be climate-crusaded, the smaller ones do successful bribing and greenwashing, but I think there will eventually be climate crusades - against those poor bastards who formally fail to do something right, but don’t really contribute meaningfully to emissions.

    Other than finding some wonderful (like in Total Recall) process to turn fossil fuels into matter practically not separable and not usable as fuel, I don’t know what one can do.

    Profitable personal mobile nuclear batteries are still not reality.

    Some new magical principle of producing energy, sufficiently decentralized (here go big NPPs). There’s none, so prepare for dark future.

















  • It’s not decentralized on the level of project development, the visible proof of which is what we’ve seen happen.

    How many times have you seen two branches of a significant project to coexist with comparable popularity?

    I wonder if there’s some way to manage an open source project so that it’s not subject to particular national laws in this way.

    Yes. Pseudonymous software development. I’ve seen Ross Ulbricht’s name today, so we also know the risks.

    Naturally this is closer to some underground warez than to copyleft, because the legal ways of protecting copylefted information against appropriation will not be available. A different paradigm.


  • I’m thinking about that conspiracy theory of Linus having been made an offer one can’t refuse, when some time ago he took a vacation and returned with news about seeing the error of his ways.

    It almost coincided with Stallman being canceled for one of his usual highly socially unacceptable, but in principle consistent opinions. With most of the attackers being frankly some new random corporate-associated people, not very active in real communities.

    Maybe I’ll re-read J4F and compare Linus from there to these events. Canary and all.

    EDIT: Before you downvote this for the mush in my head (thx Linus) propagating conspiracy theories, offers one can’t refuse are not exactly an impossible thing. And WWII radio games, where, having captured an enemy station’s operator, one of the sides could either imitate their style in transmissions or just force them to transmit what it wanted.