A ephebophile is a older adult who are sexually attracted to 15 and 19.

It really grinds my gears that society doesn’t have a problem with a 18 year old having consensual sex with a 17-year-old. Even though the 18 year old is an adult and the 17 year old is a minor. But if 26 year old has consensual sex with a 18 year old. Ah then society has a problem. But why should that be a problem? When both actions are completely harmless as long as both people are consenting adults.

  • TrenGoblin@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Thats the wrong definition of ephebophilia you idiot. Ephebophilia is when an older adult is sexually attracted to post-pubescent teenagers or adolescents but still biologically adults—usually those in the age range 15–19.Adults with this attraction are called ephebophiles. https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebophilia#:~:text=sexual preference characterized by sexual,the age range 15–19.

    I only want to be in casual sexual relationship with 18 and 19 year old woman because 18 and 19 year old woman are both adults and they’re hot as fuck.

    But I will never have sex with a 17-year-old woman because I believe any adult that has sex with in minors is immoral. Even if the age of consent is 16 in most parts of the world. Because I believe adults should only have sex with other adults and minors should only have sex with other minors that are close to their age of course. Because obliviously a 15 year old having sex with a 9 year old is a pedophile and is immoral.

    • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      lol, the APA is certainly a more credible source than Wikipedia, and you’re just cherry-picking a definition that doesn’t make you sound like a kiddie-fucker.

      I only want to be in casual sexual relationship with 18 and 19 year old woman because 18 and 19 year old woman are both adults and they’re hot as fuck.

      That’s obviously not true, for if it were, you wouldn’t be trying so hard to convince everyone here that it’s ok to fuck kids.

      • TrenGoblin@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Again I have always said that ephebophilia between two consenting adults is not morally wrong. For example if I a 26 year man want to have sex with a 18 year old woman then I don’t think it’s morally wrong for me to do that because me and her are both consenting adults.

        But ephebophilia between an adult and a minor is morally wrong. For example if a 26 year old man has sex with a 17-year-old woman. I would consider that to be immoral because I believe adult should never have sex with minors. Even if the age of consent is 16 in most parts of the world. It is morally wrong in my opinion.

        • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Again I have always said that ephebophilia between two consenting adults

          you’re not entitled to your own facts.

          cherry-picking a different definition from google just because you want to engage in rationalizing fucking children doesn’t magically make it acceptable or “moral”. you’re just engaging in mental gymnastics to make what you’re doing sound like you don’t want to fuck kids, when everything else you describe is you wanting to fuck children.

          get help

          • TrenGoblin@lemmy.caOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            You’re seriously an idiot. In the OP clearly say that ephebophilia between two consenting adults is not morally wrong .

            • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Cherry picking

              Cherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position while ignoring a significant portion of related and similar cases or data that may contradict that position. Cherry picking may be committed intentionally or unintentionally.

              just because you found some definition from google that says you’re not a kiddie fucker doesn’t mean you’re not a kiddie fucker. The APA is a far more credible source than some random wiki-- you just lash out because you don’t want to admit you’re a kiddie fucker and that fucking kids is disgusting and wrong.

              STOP FUCKING KIDS, KIDDIE FUCKER!