A ephebophile is a older adult who are sexually attracted to 15 and 19.

It really grinds my gears that society doesn’t have a problem with a 18 year old having consensual sex with a 17-year-old. Even though the 18 year old is an adult and the 17 year old is a minor. But if 26 year old has consensual sex with a 18 year old. Ah then society has a problem. But why should that be a problem? When both actions are completely harmless as long as both people are consenting adults.

  • TrenGoblin@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    You’re seriously an idiot. In the OP clearly say that ephebophilia between two consenting adults is not morally wrong .

    • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Cherry picking

      Cherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position while ignoring a significant portion of related and similar cases or data that may contradict that position. Cherry picking may be committed intentionally or unintentionally.

      just because you found some definition from google that says you’re not a kiddie fucker doesn’t mean you’re not a kiddie fucker. The APA is a far more credible source than some random wiki-- you just lash out because you don’t want to admit you’re a kiddie fucker and that fucking kids is disgusting and wrong.

      STOP FUCKING KIDS, KIDDIE FUCKER!

      • TrenGoblin@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The definition that you give is wrong you idiot.

        Ephebophiles are only sexually attracted to late adolescents 16 and 19 years old.

        Someone who is sexually attracted to early adolescents children age 11 and 14 are hebephiles you idiot which is immoral https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebephilia

        • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The definition that you give is wrong you idiot.

          just because you don’t like it doesn’t make it wrong. if you have a more credible source than the American Psychological Association, i’d like to see it. so far, you’ve just cherry-picked some rando definition that doesn’t make you look like the kiddie fucker you are,.

            • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Here is more credit source

              according to who? a kiddie fucker?

              lmao psychology today is a casual-reading magazine for civilians, not a professional resource, like a psychology dictionary from a professional organization.

              just more

              Cherry-picking

              Cherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position while ignoring a significant portion of related and similar cases or data that may contradict that position. Cherry picking may be committed intentionally or unintentionally.[2]

              stop fucking kids, kiddie fucker