Ah, I think I got the source of misunderstanding: these mechanisms are not automated, but implemented as moderation guidelines and rules.
Ah, I think I got the source of misunderstanding: these mechanisms are not automated, but implemented as moderation guidelines and rules.
SO has mechanisms in place to filter out AI-generated content.
Editing any content to reduce its quality is considered vandalism and gets reverted on SO.
Except it’s not your data anymore. By submitting any content, you transfer the rights to SO.
Vandalism is always reverted on SO, even if done by the original author. No knowledge is lost. Suing OA for violating the CC-BY license might be possible, but I’d wager SO is not interested in suing them, and since they hold the rights, not much can be done by others.
The proper response would have been to apologize at the first opportunity.
You said yourself that a penny is too much. What’s lower than a penny and not free?
Then the problem is not that the practice of renting exists, but wealth inequality. Which we fully agree on, especially since several mechanisms are at work that further the gap between the rich and the poor. These all should be addressed.
What’s holding you back from taking a loan and paying mortgage instead of rent? Risk aversion?
Fuck the soviet union - harder than how the soviet troops fucked both my grandmothers when they “liberated” my birth country, and harder than how the soviet rule fucked the economy afterwards.
No, tiktok is not digital media. It’s a chinese cyber warfare weapon of mass destruction.
Nah, letters bring another complexity - besides with them Feb gets sorted after Dec.
Or by generating the hashes of all expected permutations of the password the user has just set, and keeping them until the next password is set to compare against. Granted, that would be a prodigious number, but technically doable.