At least the wire would just be rebranded plastic skipping ropes poorly glued together, from some 2-day old seller account called JoyLifexxxkfjKfjsjsjLi.
At least the wire would just be rebranded plastic skipping ropes poorly glued together, from some 2-day old seller account called JoyLifexxxkfjKfjsjsjLi.
He might be making a play for non-competence. Either his dribbling performance doesn’t matter and he wins the election and pardons himself, or he is declared unfit to serve, but then gets lenient sentencing or dismissed altogether.
Something must be wrong with the site at the moment, as I don’t see any video in the article. The rendering is also a bit fucked up.
They will just use a large margin not matching polls as “proof” of election fraud
That makes sense. I can’t even remember what I thought you meant, so I’ll blame my post on being at the end of a long day.
What’s a Conservative former PM got to do with the Labour Party?
I saw some weird interview show on youtube where they spent the whole time eating ultra spicy chicken wings while interviewing
I jumped to 5m and he was going on about the “size of the crowds outside like you wouldn’t believe”. The guy is even fucking obsessed with crowd sizes when he’s cooking fries.
in the 90s telling (and asking) people those things would have been such a suspicious, sketchy move.
a/s/l?
That’s ok, so is the population distribution.
Taking lessons would require showing humility and admitting he isn’t already naturally the best at something.
The dossier is probably just one of those binders full of upholstery samples.
More to the point, why set up cameras for the overflow crowd? They need screens showing footage from inside, not cameras filming them.
Also, he probably wants a giant gold statue of himself, paid for by taxpayers.
Sounds like the term I’ve heard a lot: “Champagne socialist”.
Fingerprint search found him on crime database?
Gone from mine too, tried every sorting option. The link in the other comment works though. Probably some federation thing.
I agree, but the Democratic campaign will now be muted, or Republicans will rebuke them for any attacks and the media will enable them to make Democrats look bad for it.
Did the stenographer somehow hear a lack of apostrophe? If he were referring to the supporters themselves, the correct phrase would be “are his supporters”, therefore I’d default to interpreting what he said as "is his supporters’ ", ie “is that coming from his supporters”.