They work on light scratches, but anything too deep will damage the data layer. However, you can do a lot with cloth and toothpaste
They work on light scratches, but anything too deep will damage the data layer. However, you can do a lot with cloth and toothpaste
Those were legit, though, you can resurface optical media to allow it to be read again
As long as they don’t start building tunnels under their house because they’re an ‘engineer’…
Peer-reviewed NYT op-Eds (/s)
The meme may be true, but it is less meaningful than you might assume at first glance. The obvious comparison is those memes comparing wages or dollar values with house prices, where obviously inflation has made a huge difference in 100 years. However, you should compare it to other types of investment, so does a stock index grow as fast as home prices or not?
Also, all those tube sites are littered with ads.
This is like the r/edc guys whipping out their knives at every opportunity or r/guns hoping some day they can justify shooting someone
I guess the question is whether or not the exposed sides are integral to sushi or not, and I think they are. It’s like the ‘how many holes does a straw have’ all over again Edit: nevermind they said slice. So yes, definitely sushi. Although the jury is still out on a full stuffed crust pizza, or a jelly filled donut for that matter.
It’s not worth it, and while the transphobia is absent, the antisemitism is still there
Unpopular opinion because it’s so recent, but I think Starfield is/will be in this category
Which makes water lava, technically speaking
And to add a platitude: “Any idiot can build a bridge that stands, but it takes an engineer to build a bridge that barely stands.”
But to build on your analogy: we don’t make regulations based on a religious doctrine anymore in most countries. If your religion says no one is allowed to wear mixed fabrics or eat pork, that’s fine if you’re not doing that, but we’re not banning those things for all of society.
There’s about as much proof for an existential AGI threat as there is for a deity, so let’s not make policies based on either, and focus instead on real potential and already proven harms of AI
Best case you have some shampoo bottles you can read the ingredients of. Or for the very sophisticated you have toilet literature in your bathroom.
I have to disagree here. Disclaimer: I work for a bank but not super into the core financial stuff. Firstly, banks are already super heavily regulated; anti money laundering, terrorism financing, know your customer, etc. The reason crypto takes minutes for international transfers and banks can take days isn’t because of technology, it’s all of those checks on fraud happening. All the money leaving a bank account is, barring very advanced fraud, with the user’s consent, but in fraud cases this is often done via social engineering (calling someone to get their codes from their bank card reader, or pretending to be a family member in need).
I thought it was funny
Sent from Sync
Think of an NFT as a membership card to a club. You can sell your card to someone else, but there’s nothing stopping the club from changing their system and no longer accepting old cards, not letting someone in despite having a card, or going out of business.
And you’ve never been able to own movies or video games, unless you made them yourself. NFT’s don’t change that either, you may own a receipt for access to something, but the club analogy still counts.
And DNS issues