• 1 Post
  • 15 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: October 30th, 2023

help-circle




  • There is a disconnect between the statistics and reality. I am not sure where, but I suspect inflation is not being calculated correctly. It may be that lower cost items rose at a higher rate, so even though it averages out, it’s harder to reduce spending. 17% doesn’t seem to match the numbers I’ve seen for take out and home prices for example.

    At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter what’s on a chart it matters how many things people had to choose to not buy or do because they couldn’t afford it.


  • Are you that much of an idiot? You’re asking me to prove a negative. I have all of the original files, there’s a date stamp in the future in the image itself, that’s the proof right in front of your face if you ever bothered to look. You’re not actually calling someone out when you offer zero proof, no follow-up, and no basis in reality and just reply to a reasonable request with insults. Nothing comes up on google, if it did, you would have linked it. Regardless of what you want to tell yourself, you are the one that came to my post to shit on my creative work. I will never prove that to you, but that is the case. Your mind is not open enough to listen to reasonable evidence if I were to offer more because it is already evident. Arguing is a waste of breath. You’re no keyboard warrior, saving the world from the big bad advertising agencies. You’re a simple, worthless troll, doing your part to make sure fewer people want to share their ideas or waste their time on a new platform. So, sleep soundly after whatever imusthavethelastword reply you give to this. I’m done


  • I can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic. Either way, this is definitely the message that’s being broadcasted on loop in a lot of places, especially here. On the surface it seems to be trying to convince swing voters to lean left. If that’s the case, it very much misses the mark. I’m not positive that this is a US specific message, but that is my perspective.

    I had a much longer rant typed out, but it wasn’t terribly constructive. The long and short of it is that we have a lot of problems that need to be addressed in this world that have yet to even be acknowledged (and thus no solutions proposed) because they are being drowned out by the handful of arguments that are the most emotionally charged and thus, least productive to debate. Every election has been a “race to the bottom” and every year it starts earlier, lasts longer, and gets stupider. That is to say, there is no intellectual consideration whatsoever. It is no longer a discussion about governance, it is a cheerleading mantra for a sports team. The arguments are all emotionally charged and feel more like propaganda than discussion - this is what “both sides” are guilty of. The candidates don’t even bother to show up to debates anymore, and it doesn’t seem to make a difference.

    I have my opinion about who is the worst option, but that does nothing to convince someone looking for a reason to vote **for ** someone, not **against ** someone.



  • Google what exactly? I made everything up myself, you’re claiming it’s, an advertisement for, what, exactly? There’s no real companies even mentioned. There’s a radio station that comes up in British Columbia that’s close, but not the same frequency.

    So you’ve made a claim, and now you’re putting the burden of proof on me. That’s the kind of conspiracy theory BS that we need to leave on reddit. I’ll look around, but I know you’re full of shit, because I am the author. Share your citations.







  • Couldn’t be further from what I want. What I don’t want to do is to give the Republicans, or any party reason to argue that whatever measures are taken against Trump are not lawful. It needs to be unambiguous that he violated the law of the land and establish that precedent so that executive action is not required, encouraged, needed or possibly even allowed. Otherwise we have accomplished literally nothing to protect our democracy, quite the opposite, in fact. Presidential decree is not law and can’t be expected to survive one administration to the next.

    Calling it his number 1 job is hyperbole unless it stands up in court. And if it does, I will agree with you, just show me the court case.

    That’s the point of checks and balances; to draw a clear separation of power.