What’s the pushback against it? I like that you can modify and publish version of it as long as it’s noncommercial
What’s the pushback against it? I like that you can modify and publish version of it as long as it’s noncommercial
Are you an expert tho
Anecdotally, so far I’ve noticed cars getting louder
Exacerbate = the rare minerals issue?
I also don’t trust them that they won’t sell my data if I pay them
Not at all actually, maybe for my parents
Been using buckwheat pillows since I was a kid, they’re awesome
Do you game with friends? If so, what do you use instead of discord?
Closest I’ve gotten ti a link is this https://www.tiktok.com/discover/idaho-book-ban-graduation
Edit: found a video on dailymotion https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13478661/Annabelle-Jenkins-Idaho-graduation-Handmaids-tale-book-ban.html
Will probably omly bolster their believers
Still sucks ifyou can get in
I’d put the blame on the branding, full self drive shluld mean full self drive, not most-conditions self drive without explicitly providing the limitations. Even irplane autopilot systems, which solve a simpler problem, have explicit limitations stated
Are there notes available to read?
Just like Apple gives you the optiom to disallow tracking but their definition of tracking leaves a lot of room for data to be collected and shared with 3rd party
Like what for example?
Massive boner* FTFY
I feel like “threat model” can distance people away from privacy communities, i.e. thinking you need a threat to get privacy. I certainly avoid using it because of that opinion. I wish there was a more approachable non-security term for it, like “data priority” or something like that.
Again, just my opinion and how I react to hearing “threat model” (as a privacy advocate myself).
TIL
https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/wiki/4_freedoms