Barely a spiel. He put that “dangerous democrat rhetoric” crap between him lying to villainize Harris and lying to villainize migrants. He barely paused to breath switching back and forth from that completely disingenuous talking point.
Barely a spiel. He put that “dangerous democrat rhetoric” crap between him lying to villainize Harris and lying to villainize migrants. He barely paused to breath switching back and forth from that completely disingenuous talking point.
idiotic dumbass
That’s a funny way to spell “intentional liar.”
I recall a time, not too long ago, when conservatives hated Musk with a passion and wanted him to fail at everything he did.
That’s exactly what it will be. “It is totally not Project 2025 because Musk made it up after heading the task force, right… right? Wait, he came up with all the exact same actions as Project 2025? That must be coincidence.”
Better get a discount on that chicken, it’s cooked unevenly.
I mean, Kathy Hochul was clearly not unwitting in her money laundering… so if your comparison is to say these right-wing influencers were completely aware of their Russian ties and were not duped at all, I am down with that.
“Someone”… that’s a pretty forgiving term for a bot.
With the right vote he could be doing that in a few years too.
You could try using concise language that clarifies your position to avoid being confused with MAGA. It doesn’t make you laugh but what does it make you feel?
I would hate myself voting for or not voting against a candidate who will only increase support for genocide.
I understand your frustration with the Harris option but am glad you are willing to still vote. So many others seem be happy allowing things to become worse just because they can’t make it better, which is an even less moral response.
Iowa State Fair, yes.
I feel like this would be an actually valuable application of AI.
Have someone run in half way through to spray orange spray paint on the cardboard face, call it a touch up.
I’d take seat 7, dude. Then distract Terry with questions about pythons, jack.
Could probably pull that off with meta information to determine the age of the photo.
They had centuries to make pong, so I wouldn’t get your hopes up with context-free assumption.
Eliminating QA is a huge value. We all know it reduces costs relating to employing people, but that’s just the start. It eliminates the number of bugs found and reduces the amount of work that comes with it. All in all it helps projects to release on time. There could be no problem with this, clearly.
I wouldn’t support either party
Sadly, we don’t get this option. We get to support one, the other or either… not neither.
I don’t know if you know this, but Trump’s uncle was a professor at MIT. Just a random piece of information that bares no change to your completely factual and valid statement.
Did the lady have 5 kids to feed?