• Chessmasterrex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    At least 10 percent of my time sitting in a classroom in college was waiting for the prof to get the projector to work with their laptop.

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      So far I am lucky enough to have not had any classes that have had the issue of a professor not being able to get their projector or computer to work.

      Closest I had was the Linux VMs we were using for a Linux fundamentals class were having troubles because someone gave them too much resources by accident (I think it was memory but I don’t fully remember), causing them to sometimes just stop working because there wasn’t enough for every VM. Somehow persisted pretty much the whole quarter before being figured out.

  • elrik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Up to 20%” is meaningless for a headline and is pure click bait. It could be any number between 0% and 20%. Or put another way, any number from no time at all to a horrifying more than an entire day per week.

    Why not just state the average from what is probably a statistically irrelevant study and move on?

  • oo1@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    53% of my time is spent looking for CASE statements without an END. This is 99% human error - does that count?

  • czardestructo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    That number was more like 30% with a windows laptop and all the security crap Microsoft convinced my company to install. It was so painfully slow and glitchy. So I went rogue and put Linux on my company laptop 8 months ago and I’m not looking back.

    • Fecundpossum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yep. Over here running Fedora KDE 40 on my desktop, dealing with zero issues. My use case is pretty simple, but everything I use just works, no issues.

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        If your use case is “pretty simple,” you’re unlikely to have problems with any operating system.

        • czardestructo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          In my case I’m a manager so I don’t do any real work. Linux is great for an Edge browser, ms365 paper pushing wana be engineer.

  • CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    How about everyone who has zero skills with these problems, do they count is 0% spent on them as they outsource it or do they count as 100% since the smallest problem incapacitates their computer usage?

    • KISSmyOS@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Do you have a moment to talk about our Lord and Savior Fedora Silverblue?
      I spend literally no time at all dealing with my OS.

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m literally dealing with an update issue with this distro lol

        To he fair, it was perfect, literally perfect, until now. And even now, it’s not unbootable, since I can just use the previous image point. Just sucks I can’t update.

      • twig@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean, that’s fine, but as a Linux user I’ve fucked around a lot and spent a lot of time fixing mistakes that I did not need to make.

        I think I’m a pretty average Linux user. Who needs something that “just works” when you can break it by trying to add something you don’t need?

    • oo1@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      All 0.4% of the user base or whatever it is? Unless you mean among the population of server admins.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Really? Because I updated and my wine prefix just broke. That was yesterday.

      • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is so not true unless you are using some super stable old Debian release and aren’t doing complex work.

        Most DEs are super buggy, especially the darling child kde, which right off the bat makes things not super stable.

        Additionally some of the most loved distros are rolling release and inherently unstable.

        Hell, I use multiple distros daily, fedora and slackware, I also use windows for work, windows is by and large more stable in my experience.

        Slackware has kernel panics monthly, kde crashes on fedora, Wayland has too many problems to count, meaning I have to switch to x sessions all the time.

        Most GUI software I use has tons of visual glitches.

        Yes it’s tolerable, that’s why I still use it, but I wouldn’t exactly say it ‘just works’

        I would estimate I restart my fedora computer about 4-5 times more often than than the windows computer, and usually I have to restart fedora because of serious hard crashes (e.g. kde crashes so hard that I can’t even switch to a tty, meaning I need to hard reset)

        • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’ve not had anything like that since… forever. But then I’m not a kde nor fedora user. Naturally raises the question - have you considered switching from kde, fedora or both?

          • 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            If Linux “just worked” I would have switched years ago. I’ve used several distributions, always preferred Gnome to KDE, and even with “expert” help setting things up, I always spent way more time trying to make things work than actually having things work. Unless it’s a basic-ass workstation being used for minimal computer things or to run a server for something, there’s always something that doesn’t want to work.

            I like the idea of Linux more than I actually like using Linux. :/

        • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I use KDE on my Linux machine, which means that I cannot develop anything involving the GPU.

          The moment I experiment a little with the API or give it wrong parameters, not only my program crashes, but the whole system freezes and I have to manually press the “power off” button.

          It does happen in windows too, however it’s 100x less unlikely.

          I also had a problem not long ago that crashing my program would not free the RAM, so every time I ran the program (and it crashed), I had 2-3GiB less of RAM. So I had to restart the computer every 10 runs or so.

          Operating systems are supposed to isolate programs and manage their resources. A program crashing under no circumstances should affect any other program. I don’t understand how it can happen.

  • JordanZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This study was only with 234 people.

    “A number of the participants in the survey were IT professionals, while most of the other participants were highly competent IT and computer users. Nevertheless, they encountered these problems, and it turns out that this involves some fundamental functions,”

    As someone that works in IT the amount of people I’ve come across that have little to no technical ability to be in that field is staggering. It had a high paycheck so they showed up. Doesn’t make them competent computer users.

    Lemmy pointed me to another study a bit ago. It was ~216K people ages 16-65 and multiple countries.

    One of the easy tasks was to use the reply-all feature for an email program to send a response to three people

    According to that study this is where 43% of the participants skills ended(or didn’t even reach cause I stuck level 0 and 1 together).

    This was the most depressing part…

    The numbers for the 4 skill levels don’t sum to 100% because a large proportion of the respondents never attempted the tasks, being unable to use computers.

    So my above 43% is really 69% of users. That’s where their abilities taper off.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s actually simple.

      HIG, UX, ergonomics, all that - it doesn’t build up. Acceptable complexity of a pretty mechanical normal 80s’ UI\UX is the same as of a modern one. Humans don’t evolve over decades, they evolve over spans of time which are as good as eternity. They still need the same kind of complexity in tools they use.

      A control panel for a loader that a factory worker should be able to use is as complex as a workflow on a computer can be. And that’s very explicitly accounting for the fact that loader’s or lift’s control panel doesn’t change every fucking day and the user remembers it, so computer UIs should be simpler than those of lifts and loaders!

      You just don’t make UI\UX more complex than that. There are things humans can learn to do, and there are things they often can’t and they shouldn’t.

      The issue is that this creates a bottleneck for clueless project managers, UI designers and such. They can’t throw together some shit in 30 minutes. They have to choose. They have to test. They don’t want that. And no regulation makes them do that, because if a loader has an unclear UI\UX, you might kill someone, while if an email program has that, you’ll just get very nervous.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        A control panel for a loader that a factory worker should be able to use is as complex as a workflow on a computer can be. And that’s very explicitly accounting for the fact that loader’s or lift’s control panel doesn’t change every fucking day and the user remembers it, so computer UIs should be simpler than those of lifts and loaders!

        I design control panels. I try to keep the workflow consistent not because I see value in it, but because some asshole decided that they didn’t want to pay for retraining. Really I don’t care, having to retool slightly every decade or so is pretty reasonable. Especially given that the tech is always changing.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Especially given that the tech is always changing.

          Humans don’t. Changing things is fine, making using them more complex for the same result, because another decade has passed, is not.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It has to get more complicated, more edge cases have popped up and the process is more complicated.

            Look basic example. I made an uncoiler and needed to add in a reverse override. Why? Because someone one time loaded it in wrong.