If you ever wanted to read about fake druids vs. environmental activists, now’s your chance.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I hope you’re right because this article says they used a spray can.

    Also, orange dye can easily get into cracks in the rocks and stay there for a very long time. Especially if it displaces the lichens. That won’t make it collapse, so maybe ‘damage’ is not the right word, but this is potentially long-lasting vandalism which, as far as I can see, will have no effect on the actual problem.

    • Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I hope you’re right because this article says they used a spray can.

      Which brings me back to the last point in my comment. I also hope I’m right but the two times I looked into it (right after the attack and before writing my comment) both came up with that result and also it seems that English Heritage came out today saying there was “No visible damage”.

      As I said, I’m not writing to defend the action, just pointing out that the OP article is, willfully or not, omitting certain aspects that could make JSO look a little bit better.

      • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        To play devil’s advocate against the devil’s advocate, I’m not sure “Stonehenge covered with orange corn starch by Just Stop Oil activists” would have communicated the kind of emergency these activists are hoping to convey, so they’re clearly counting on the headline grabbing people’s attention and triggering their outrage meter. In that way, the journalist might even think they’re helping the JSO group.