• JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Nope. Your shit needs to be called out just like the others. Blocking anti-democracy lemmy users is exactly what you all want as has been discussed in another thread. It allows you to spread your rhetoric loud and clear with zero opposition.

        • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          So you’re actually admitting to purposefully agitating people? That’s respectably bold.

          • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            actually admitting to purposefully agitating people

            Lol, bud, i’ve been screaming that I am. Literally every conversation i have with mozz ends up debating the merits of political agitation.

            I don’t blame you for not seeing that if you’ve blocked me, though I’ve been told blocking doesn’t actually hide activity, so maybe you should have seen it? Either way, I think it’s funny that admitting to agitation is ‘bold’ to you, since agitation is the basis for all protest in the history of the US.

            • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Oh as I said, I don’t block propagandists. They need to be called out. So I’m not sure why you still feel the need to suggest that I have.

              And it’s bold to admit to agitating people as here it’s essentially considered trolling. To purposefully anger people- especially when you also admit that what you’re doing is shitposting….

              People are banned for far less.

              But you’re free to call what you’re doing whatever you would like- it won’t change the fact that you essentially just admitted to trolling people.